Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
ENTERTAINMENT NETWORK (INDIA) LIMITED v. HTTPS//TUNEINCOM/PODCASTS/ARTS—CULTURE
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Entertainment Network (India) Ltd against unauthorized use of its copyrighted audio content and trademarks by defendants, decreeing the suit under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-filing of written statements.
Janki Devi Sharma v. State & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted probate of a duly registered Will to the sole beneficiary and natural heir, exempting her from filing administration and surety bonds in an uncontested petition under Section 276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
R.K SHARMA v. BSES YAMUNA POWER LTD.
The High Court dismissed the Revision Petition challenging the refusal to transfer a civil appeal, holding that alleged bias and procedural grievances did not justify transfer under Section 24 CPC.
Vijay Kumar v. Sashastra Seema Bal
The Delhi High Court directed the Sashastra Seema Bal to prepare and operate a waiting list to fill unoccupied constable vacancies, ensuring eligible candidates are appointed without retrospective seniority.
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. Aditya Yadav and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against defendant's use of 'Dream11' sub-domain for trademark infringement and passing off, proceeding ex parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-appearance.
VIGYAPAN LOKE DELHI ADVERTISING C.G.H.S. LTD v. WAZIR HUSSAIN
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition and dismissed the plaintiff's money recovery suit as barred by limitation, holding that limitation commences from the date of invoices and mere balance sheet entries do not extend limitation.
Sporta Technologies Pvt Ltd and Anr. v. John Doe and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and ex parte decree against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off by replicating the plaintiff's website and marks, relying on Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' non-appearance.
Geeta Katyal v. Manak Portfolios (P) Ltd. and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the appellants' suit and decree in favor of respondents, holding that withdrawal of an earlier suit without permission bars instituting a fresh suit on the same subject matter under Order XXIII Rule 1(4) CPC.
Manmeet Yadav v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that DDA cannot require MCD verification of a structural safety certificate issued by a licensed engineer and directed DDA to process the petitioner’s amalgamation application without further delay.
Mayank Jain; P. Singh; Adhur Jain; Arpit Goel v. Bharat Coking Coal Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld the Arbitral Tribunal's discretion to allow amendment of the Statement of Defence and framing of additional issues, dismissing the petition challenging the order for lack of perversity or bad faith.
Joginder Singh v. Kuldeep Singh and Others
The High Court allowed the petitioner a final opportunity to have his wife testify in his place in a partition suit due to his mental incapacity, setting aside the trial court’s closure of evidence subject to payment of costs.
Manoj Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed appointment of the candidate after CFSL confirmed thumb impression match, overruling handwriting mismatch rejection and emphasizing natural justice.
Dilip Wagheshwari v. Amit Khare & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that increments cannot be withheld during suspension without proven misconduct and directed fresh consideration of arrears payment following the petitioner's retirement.
Mohd. Jalaluddin v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused in the 2020 North-East Delhi communal riots, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and prolonged pre-trial incarceration as grounds for bail despite serious charges.
Mohd. Wasim @ Bablu v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner accused of serious offences in the 2020 communal riots, emphasizing the principle that bail is the norm and jail the exception, and highlighting the need for credible evidence of common intention before denying bail.
State (NCT of Delhi) v. Harpreet Singh Khalsa & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an accused discharged by the Trial Court but released before the High Court stayed the discharge order must surrender to judicial custody under Section 390 Cr.P.C. pending disposal of the revision petition.
Dashrath Prasad Ramnandan Pandey College of Pharmacy v. Pharmacy Council of India
The Delhi High Court directed the Pharmacy Council of India to treat the petitioner’s erroneous extension application for B. Pharm approval as an initial approval application and decide it expeditiously, rejecting a hypertechnical approach.
Shri Bhagwan & Ors. v. Birmati & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a simplicitor suit for injunction by co-owners to restrain unauthorized construction or alienation is maintainable even without physical possession, setting aside the trial court's order dismissing the suit on that ground.
Future Generali India Insurance Co Ltd v. Ram Sakhee & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the liability of the insurer for a fatal motor accident, adjusted compensation calculations, and affirmed interest at 9% per annum.
Rajeev Mathur & Anr. v. IFFCO Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging compensation awarded for a deceased pedestrian in a road accident, upholding the Tribunal's denial of loss of income and consortium claims due to lack of evidence.