Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sunita Ranga v. Vijayinder Kumar & Ors.

05 Nov 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8516

The Delhi High Court rejected a partition suit as without cause of action where the suit property was transferred by registered Gift Deed and Will prior to the owner's death, extinguishing his title.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC cause of action partition suit registered Gift Deed

Amarendra Dhari Singh v. Rajshree Singh; Amarendra Dhari Singh v. Arundhati Khanna

05 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:8483

The Delhi High Court held that admitted loans repayable on demand cannot be postponed at the debtor's discretion and that insertion of dates in undated signed cheques does not amount to material alteration, dismissing defendants' leave to defend applications and granting summary judgment to the plaintiff.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend summary suit loan repayable on demand

Amarendra Dhari Singh v. Aditi Shivinder Singh

05 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla · 2024:DHC:8480

The Delhi High Court held that a defendant's clear admission of a loan repayable on demand justifies passing a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 CPC, rejecting vague defenses including repayment 'as and when able to' and material alteration of cheques.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order XII Rule 6 CPC loan repayment admission of debt material alteration

Renu Jain v. Union of India & Ors.

05 Nov 2024 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:8479-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the confirmation of an auction sale, holding that statutory conditions under Rules 60 and 61 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 are mandatory and the petitioner lacked locus and evidence to set aside the sale.

civil petition_dismissed Significant auction sale Rules 60 and 61 Second Schedule Income Tax Act, 1961

Union of India v. NK DSC Simon Topno Retd

04 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8510-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order condoning a shortfall in qualifying service for second service pension in the Defence Security Corps, ruling that statutory Pension Regulations override contrary administrative policy instructions.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant second service pension Defence Security Corps condonation of shortfall Armed Forces Tribunal

Union of India & Ors. v. Ex JWO Udaiveer Gautam

04 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8581-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a discharged serviceman, affirming the presumption that disabilities arising during service are attributable to military service unless disproved by the employer.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disability pension military service Entitlement Rules for Casualty Pensionary Awards, 1982 Medical Board opinion

Rajesh v. Directorate General Sashastra Seema Bal

04 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8366-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an acquittal on merit entitles a candidate to appointment despite prior criminal charges and that non-disclosure of specific offence details, when FIR and pendency were disclosed, does not justify cancellation absent clear suppression.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant honourable acquittal benefit of doubt suppression of material facts appointment cancellation

Mahender Singh v. Union of India & Ors.

04 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8646-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking re-fixation of pay, holding that the petitioner’s pay was correctly fixed as per the option exercised under the 7th CPC and relevant rules, and that failure to revise the option within prescribed timelines bars any claim for pay correction.

service_law petition_dismissed pay fixation 7th Central Pay Commission option for pay fixation Central Civil Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2016

Anil Kumar Sharma & Ors. v. Awadh Kishore

04 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9171

The Delhi High Court allowed the civil revision petition and rejected the plaintiff's suit for possession as barred by limitation and lacking cause of action, holding that an Agreement to Sell and GPA do not confer ownership sufficient to maintain possession against third parties.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Agreement to Sell General Power of Attorney

M/S RKMT BUILDCON PRIVATE LIMITED v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi

04 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8501

The Delhi High Court directed reference of additional contractual claims to the existing Sole Arbitrator subject to parties' waiver of Section 12(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, thereby facilitating arbitration despite unilateral appointment concerns.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 12(5) arbitration agreement

Sequential Technology International India Pvt. Ltd. v. Addl. CIT, Spcl. Range-7

04 Nov 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8843-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court allowed the taxpayer's appeal and remanded the transfer pricing dispute for fresh examination of the inclusion of E4e Healthcare as a comparable entity, holding that the authorities erred in rejecting objections based on non-availability of audited financial data and functional dissimilarity.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Transfer Pricing Comparable Entity International Transaction Income Tax Act, 1961

Smita Chaudhary v. Taruna Yadav

04 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8894

The Delhi High Court held that deposit of sale consideration suffices to purge contempt for breach of injunction restraining alienation of suit property, dismissing the petitioner's plea for cancellation of sale deeds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Court Injunction Order XXXIX CPC Sale Deed

Rishi Bansal v. Income Tax Officer Ward 44(6)

04 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8468-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the reopening of income tax assessment proceedings for AY 2018-19 due to erroneous conclusions on escaped income and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper application of mind.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act 1961 Section 148 Section 148A Section 149(1)(b)

Prof. Madan Mohan v. University of Delhi and Ors.

04 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8783

The Delhi High Court held that delayed payment of retirement gratuity to a University employee attracts statutory interest under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, overruling the University's contention based on the New Pension Scheme.

labor petition_allowed Significant Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 retirement gratuity delayed payment interest New Pension Scheme

MS Shubhangi Gupta v. Commissioner of Customs & Ors.

04 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8661-DB

The Delhi High Court held that detention of goods without issuance of a statutory show cause notice under Section 124 of the Customs Act, 1962 is unlawful and directed immediate release of the detained watch.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Customs Act 1962 Section 124 show cause notice detention of goods

Dr. Hans U. Nagar v. John Nagar & Anr

04 Nov 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8701-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition for lack of evidence of willful disobedience of status quo orders limited to two servant quarters on Farm No.8, emphasizing that contempt requires clear proof of deliberate violation.

civil petition_dismissed contempt of court status quo order doctrine of lis pendens willful disobedience

Unilin Beheer B.V. v. Balaji Action Buildwell

04 Nov 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8690

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to file confidential third-party license agreements in sealed cover and directed the constitution of a confidentiality club, holding that reasonable cause justified filing additional documents during the suit.

civil other Significant confidential documents third-party license agreements confidentiality club Order XI Rule 1(5)

M/S KALPATARU PROJECTS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED v. GAIL (INDIA) LIMITED

04 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8502

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes where parties failed to agree on appointment, directing the arbitrator to decide maintainability and arbitrability objections at the outset.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) sole arbitrator appointment maintainability of claims

Sony India Private Limited v. IT Care

04 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8500

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration to proceed after the petitioner demonstrated valid service and existence of an arbitration agreement.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Sole Arbitrator appointment Service Agreement

Ashok Kumar v. Vijay Kumar

04 Nov 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 7148

The Delhi High Court held that a revision petition challenging an eviction order becomes infructuous and is not maintainable once possession of the premises is restored to the landlord through execution proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Significant revision petition eviction order possession restoration Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958