Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Reena Devi v. The Commissioner of Police & Ors.

05 Nov 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:8657-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a missing person admitted to government hospitals during the Covid-19 pandemic may be presumed dead, denied State liability for disappearance absent negligence, and granted humanitarian relief including ex-gratia compensation and contractual employment to the petitioner.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant habeas corpus missing person Covid-19 pandemic government hospital

Abhishek Jain & Anr v. Sachin Jain

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:8651
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal complaint alleging forgery of rent receipts used in civil proceedings, holding that the final civil court finding and Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. bar such prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of criminal complaint Section 195(1)(b) Cr.P.C. forgery rent receipts

Parveen Sharma v. Sumeer Mehta & Anr

05 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8622

The Delhi High Court condoned a five-year delay in filing a motor accident claim appeal but dismissed the appeal, holding the original compensation award fair and denying medical expenses due to lack of reimbursement proof.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement medical expenses reimbursement

Ritika Gulati v. Chaser Financial Services Pvt. Ltd.

05 Nov 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:8603-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld a decree directing repayment of Rs. 20 lakhs with interest, holding that admission of receipt shifts burden to prove the nature of transaction and non-compliance with RBI guidelines does not invalidate a loan.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant loan transaction NBFC RBI guidelines burden of proof

Neelam India Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. v. The Investigating Officer Police Station Lahori Gate & Anr

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:8602
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR alleging cheating in warehouse receipt financing, holding that prima facie offences were disclosed and criminal proceedings should continue.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR warehouse receipt financing privity of contract

Vijay Kumar Sharma v. Union of India

05 Nov 2024 · Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:8544
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that civil courts lack jurisdiction over enemy property suits under the amended Enemy Property Act and set aside a summary decree based on internal government communications, directing a full trial on disputed ownership claims.

property appeal_allowed Significant Enemy Property Act, 1968 Section 18B Civil court jurisdiction Order XII Rule 6 CPC

Yashovardhan Birla v. Kamdhenu Enterprises Limited and Anr.

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:8591

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal complaints under Section 138 NI Act against a non-executive Director and Chairman for lack of specific averments showing his responsibility for the company's affairs at the relevant time.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Director liability Chairman role Section 141 NI Act

State of NCT of Delhi v. Ajay Kumar Jatav

05 Nov 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8529

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition for leave to appeal against acquittal in a robbery case, holding that no prima facie case was made out to interfere with the Trial Court's judgment.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 378 CrPC leave to appeal acquittal prima facie case

M/S N.C. JAIN & SONS v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS

05 Nov 2024 · MANMOHAN, CJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:8553-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals seeking extension beyond three months to vacate stalls, holding that the Single Judge's order granting three months' extension was reasonable and no further extension was warranted.

civil appeal_dismissed extension of time vacate premises Letters Patent Act, 1866 principle of parity

Union of India v. Alliage Engineering India Pvt Ltd

05 Nov 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:8552-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the digital signature of the company is not mandatory on Form CHG-1 under Section 78 of the Companies Act, 2013, allowing charge registration without company cooperation when the company defaults.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant Companies Act, 2013 Section 78 Charge registration Form CHG-1

Abdul Khalid Saifi v. State Govt of NCT of Delhi

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:8573

The Delhi High Court upheld the framing of charges against the petitioner for instigating violent protests, holding that sufficient material existed to infer intent under Section 307 IPC and that revisional interference was unwarranted.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC framing of charges revisional jurisdiction unlawful assembly

Khushboo Alias Khushbu Rana v. ICICI Lombard General Insurance Company Ltd.

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8565

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the NCDRC to reconsider the petitioner's review application due to lack of reasons for modifying interest and compensation in an insurance theft claim dispute.

consumer other Procedural Consumer Protection Act, 1986 National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission interest rate modification review petition

Nishant Gulati v. Parmod Kumar Yadav

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8564

The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal under the Employee’s Compensation Act based on an amicable settlement, ordering return of the deposited amount to the employer after full payment to the workman.

labor appeal_allowed Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 amicable settlement compensation claim

Govind T. Samani v. Vidyadamodar Rai & Anr.

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8561

The Delhi High Court reduced an excessive bond amount fixed by the NCDRC under Section 27 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986, emphasizing that bond amounts must be reasonable and not exorbitant to ensure appearance in summary proceedings.

consumer_protection petition_allowed Significant Consumer Protection Act, 1986 Section 27 bond amount excessive bond

Usha Rani v. Kavindra Singh & Ors

05 Nov 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:8558

The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to reconsider the maintainability of the suit at final arguments stage, setting aside prior dismissal and appellate orders based on incorrect assumptions, and urged expeditious trial disposal.

civil other maintainability of suit Order VII Rule 11 CPC Section 96 CPC appeal against dismissal

Geeta Dhawan v. Anu Mehra & Anr.

05 Nov 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:8511

The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff's amendment application to add a claim for specific performance of an Agreement to Sell, holding that the relief was not barred by limitation due to a Supreme Court status quo order suspending the cause of action.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order VI Rule 17 CPC specific performance limitation

Angel Gupta v. State NCT of Delhi

05 Nov 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:8535

The Delhi High Court denied bail to the petitioner accused of conspiring to murder her partner's wife, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and risk of absconding despite trial delays.

criminal bail_denied Significant bail Section 302 IPC heinous offence murder conspiracy

Santosh v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr

05 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:8458

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR and proceedings under Section 528 BNSS based on a voluntary settlement in a private dispute involving non-compoundable offences under IPC and MV Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 528 BNSS non-compoundable offences settlement

Ravi Kumar v. Department of Space and Ors.

05 Nov 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:8498-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition challenging ISRO recruitment, holding that no error apparent on the face of the record justified review and emphasizing the limited scope of review jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed review petition error apparent on face of record normalization of marks recruitment process

Subhash Chandra Jarodia v. Vijayinder Kumar & Ors.

05 Nov 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:8519

The Delhi High Court held that a registered Gift Deed and Will are prima facie valid, dismissed the plaintiff's undue influence and co-ownership claims at interim stage, and modified the interim injunction to allow defendant's use of the property while restraining sale without court permission.

civil other Significant registered Gift Deed registered Will undue influence co-ownership