Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Bharat Broadband Network Ltd v. Paramount Communications Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing reimbursement of differential excise duty due to reclassification of goods, affirming limited judicial interference in arbitration matters.
Anoop Sharma v. Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association & Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging deletion of DDA representatives from a recovery suit, holding they were not necessary parties and the appellant lacked locus to appeal.
Anoop Sharma v. Commonwealth Games Village Apartment Owners Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging deletion of nominated DDA representatives from a recovery suit, holding they were not necessary parties and the appellant lacked locus standi.
Demas Developers Private Limited v. Indian Overseas Bank & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that disputes regarding SARFAESI proceedings post-IBC resolution plan approval must be adjudicated by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, dismissing writ petitions challenging bank actions against mortgaged agricultural properties.
The New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Anju Rani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal against a motor accident compensation award, affirming vehicle involvement and proper compensation calculation based on credible evidence.
Anju Mahajan v. Nasir Ali & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the insurance company to pay for replacement of the appellant's wheelchair as per earlier judgment and clarified that excess TDS refund claims must be pursued with tax authorities, while execution applications should be filed before the Tribunal.
Inder Minocha v. Ajit Tondon
The Delhi High Court disposed of a revision petition by recording an amicable settlement requiring the tenant to vacate premises by a specified date and pay monthly use and occupation charges, staying execution of an earlier order subject to compliance.
Delhi Development Authority v. Swaran Chadha
The Delhi High Court dismissed DDA's petition challenging the refusal to condone delay in filing an appeal against an execution order, affirming that sufficient cause is mandatory for condonation and supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 is limited.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Shamsa Tausif and Ors
Delhi High Court dismissed Oriental Insurance's petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, directing it to approach the Allahabad High Court as per Supreme Court precedent.
Dr Brij Rani Pandey v. Electrotherm India Ltd and Anr
The Delhi High Court held that it lacks jurisdiction to entertain a petition under Article 227 challenging NCDRC orders when the cause of action arose outside Delhi, permitting withdrawal with liberty to approach the appropriate High Court.
Sh. Surinder Singh Bedi Thr. LRs v. Sh. Surjit Singh Bedi Thr. LRs & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking late impleadment of defendants in a partition suit due to inordinate delay and prior knowledge of the transfer by the plaintiff.
P v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against acquittal in a POCSO case, holding that the trial court's findings were plausible and delay in reporting affected the complaint's credibility.
Chet Ram & Others v. Union of India & Another
The Delhi High Court upheld the reference court's enhanced compensation for land acquisition, rejecting the appellants' claim of commercial land use and higher valuation based on post-notification evidence and sale exemplars.
Ambuja Cement Ltd. v. Collector of Stamps, Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that a court-sanctioned scheme of amalgamation is exigible to stamp duty under the Indian Stamp Act, rejecting exemption claims and upholding the Collector's order imposing duty and penalty.
YUM! RESTAURANTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. A.N. TRADERS PRIVATE LIMITED & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition and upheld the grant of leave to defend in a summary suit where the claimed amount included interest and adjustments beyond the admitted liability under the contract, holding that such suits require leave to defend under Order XXXVII CPC.
Court on Its Own Motion v. Sanjeev Kumar
The Delhi High Court held Sanjeev Kumar guilty of criminal contempt for filing frivolous complaints and making derogatory allegations against judicial officers, sentencing him to imprisonment and fine.
Court on its Own Motion v. Sanjeev Kumar
The Delhi High Court held that baseless complaints and derogatory conduct against judicial officers constitute criminal contempt and sentenced the contemnor to imprisonment and fine.
MRS VINTI MEHROTRA & ORS. v. MR KUMAR VAIBHAV & ORS.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the plaintiffs' application to amend the plaint to challenge a Will, holding the amendment barred by limitation and prejudicial to defendants' accrued rights.
Ravinder Mandal v. M/S D.L.F. Universal Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld a Labour Court Award holding that a bona fide transfer order without malafide does not amount to illegal termination even if the employee refuses to comply.
Mr. Adarsh Ramanujan, Ms. Meenakshi Ogra, Mr. Tarun Khurana, Mr. Samrat S. Kang and Mr. Rajat Sabu v. OZONE OVERSEAS PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed the plaintiff to file additional documents in a patent infringement suit in response to the defendant's objections under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, clarifying the scope of filing documents post-pleading.