Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

Praveen Kumar Kasana & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7270

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs involving minor offences arising from a family dispute after amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR amicable settlement inherent powers

Shraddha Shandilyayan v. Livecities Media Private Limited & Ors.

20 Sep 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:7580
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court corrected a typographical error in the final order regarding the date of filing an application for condonation of delay but declined to entertain substantive challenges to the validity of the Written Statement filing under Sections 151 and 152 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Section 151 CPC Section 152 CPC correction of typographical error condonation of delay

Ujjwal Garg v. Commissioner, Department of Trade and Taxes, Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

20 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7379-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition directing restoration of the petitioner’s GST registration upon compliance with Rule 86B, holding that suspension cannot be maintained on unalleged grounds.

tax petition_allowed Significant GST registration Rule 86B CGST Rules input tax credit Show Cause Notice

T C Verma & Anr. v. Govt of NCT of Delhi

20 Sep 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:7331

The Delhi High Court held that the three-month limitation for appeals under Section 17 of the Indian Forest Act, 1927 is mandatory and the Appellate Authority cannot condone delay under the Limitation Act, quashing the impugned order and directing implementation of the Forest Settlement Officer's land exchange order.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Indian Forest Act, 1927 Section 17 limitation condonation of delay Limitation Act, 1963

Rahul Vijayvargia v. The State of Delhi and Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:7248

The Delhi High Court quashed the complaint against an Additional Independent Non-Executive Director who resigned before cheque dishonour, holding that mere directorship without control does not attract liability under the NI Act.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 NI Act Section 141 NI Act Director liability

Punjab National Bank v. Kartar Singh

19 Sep 2024 · Suresh Kumar Kait; Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:7333-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's modification of dismissal punishment to stoppage of increments with reinstatement, but limited back wages entitlement to 50% based on 'no work no pay' principle.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Industrial Disputes Act Section 11 dismissal from service punishment modification

Ravi Kumar v. Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd.

19 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7203

The Delhi High Court held that disciplinary action disputes against cooperative society employees are excepted from the bar under Section 70(1)(b) of the Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003, affirming concurrent jurisdiction of Labour Courts and remanding the matter for fresh adjudication.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Cooperative Societies Act, 2003 Section 70(1)(b) Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 disciplinary action

IQ City Medical College v. National Medical Commission & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:7276

Delhi High Court quashed NMC's denial of increase in MBBS seats for IQ City Medical College, holding that average deliveries are irrelevant and faculty deficiencies were within permissible limits under UG-MSR 2023.

administrative petition_allowed Significant National Medical Commission Medical Assessment and Rating Board Increase of MBBS seats UG-MSR 2023

GE Nuovo Pignone S.P.A v. Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation), Delhi - I & Anr.

19 Sep 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Ravinder Dudeja

The Delhi High Court upheld reassessment under Section 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for AY 2009-10, affirming the existence of Fixed Place and Dependent Agent Permanent Establishments of GE Nuovo Pignone in India and the consequent profit attribution under the DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Dependent Agent PE Fixed Place PE Section 147 Income Tax Act

Dagar v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Rekha Palli; Shalinder Kaur

The Delhi High Court held that senior RPF officers denied ACP benefits despite two promotions are entitled to pay parity with juniors who availed one promotion, directing retrospective pay upgradation.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Assured Career Progression Scheme Limited Departmental Competitive Examination pay parity seniority

M/S ANIL SHARMA AND SONS v. M/S NATIONAL SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION LTD

19 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal

The Delhi High Court clarified that in a recovery suit, issues of equitable mortgage and guarantor liability cannot be framed against a party not standing as guarantor or party to the settlement, and deleted such issues while affirming others related to cause of action and privity of contract.

civil appeal_allowed Significant recovery suit equitable mortgage guarantor liability settlement agreement

Suman Kumar v. Commissioner of Police, Delhi Police and Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan, J · 2024:DHC:7645

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a petition seeking police investigation under Section 156(3) CrPC, holding that allegations of fraudulent loan deductions amounted to a contractual dispute not warranting FIR registration.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 156(3) CrPC cognizable offence breach of contract police investigation

M/S HRC INTERNATIONAL v. Union of India and Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7198-DB

The Delhi High Court held that retrospective cancellation of GST registration without proper hearing violates natural justice and modified the cancellation order to be effective from the date of suspension.

tax appeal_allowed Significant GST registration cancellation retrospective cancellation principles of natural justice show cause notice

Parmod Kumar v. Delhi State Industrial and Infrastructure Development Corporation and Anr

19 Sep 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:7404

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 33(1)(a) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, an employer cannot terminate or alter the service conditions of a workman to his prejudice during the pendency of industrial dispute proceedings and directed maintenance of status quo in the petitioner's employment.

labor petition_allowed Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33(1)(a) status quo service conditions

Mukesh Kumar Nimesh & Ors. v. The State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

19 Sep 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7216

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, holding that continuation of proceedings would be an abuse of the court process.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute

Designarch Consultants Pvt Ltd and Anr v. Jumeirah Beach Resort LLC

19 Sep 2024 · Rajiv Shakdher; Amit Bansal

The Delhi High Court disposed of cross-appeals in a trademark dispute between Jumeirah and Designarch by recording a settlement that recognized respective trademark ownerships and imposed mutual restrictions and withdrawals of related proceedings.

civil settled trademark dispute interim injunction Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 CPC BURJ trademark

Avni Jain v. Abhishek Garg

19 Sep 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7706

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim maintenance order of ₹75,000 per month, ruling that maintenance under Section 125 CrPC aims to prevent destitution and does not require equalizing foreign income with Indian rupees.

family appeal_dismissed Significant interim maintenance Section 125 CrPC foreign income cost of living

Mr. Atul Kharbanda v. Institute of Psychic and Spiritual Research

19 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7295

The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to set aside ex parte proceedings against defendants not served by ordinary process before substituted service, permitting them to participate in the suit.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order IX Rule 7 CPC substituted service ordinary service ex parte proceedings

Raheja Developers Limited v. Bhuwan Chopra & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7289

The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition challenging non-bailable warrants against a company's Managing Director, emphasizing the moratorium under the Insolvency Code and directors' non-personal liability in execution proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code Section 96 moratorium Execution proceedings Non-bailable warrants

JK Cement Limited v. Ankur Agarwal & Ors.

19 Sep 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:7282

The Delhi High Court granted ex parte permanent injunction to JK Cement Ltd. restraining defendants from using deceptively similar 'J&K' trademark and trade dress, emphasizing protection of registered trademarks and expeditious disposal under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off deceptively similar trademark Order VIII Rule 10 CPC