Delhi High Court

47,108 judgments

Year:

EXTRAMARKS EDUCATION INDIA PVT LTD v. G D GOENKA PUBLIC SCHOOL & ANR

07 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7876

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contractual disputes where the respondents failed to respond to arbitration notices, following Supreme Court precedents restricting unilateral arbitrator appointments.

other appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause sole arbitrator appointment Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Perkins Eastman Architects

Religare Finvest Limited v. Widescreen Holdings Private Limited and Ors

07 Oct 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7802

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent substitute sole arbitrator under Section 15(2) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the original arbitrator recused herself, directing continuation of arbitration proceedings from the existing stage.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 15(2) Substitute arbitrator Recusal of arbitrator

Harpyari (Deceased) through Brij Bhushan Sharma v. Badri Bhagat Jhandewala Temple Society & Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · The Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2024:DHC:7859-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC on grounds of res judicata or disputed ownership claims without trial, and dismissed the appeal challenging such rejection.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order VII Rule 11 CPC res judicata doctrine of res judicata rejection of plaint

ISLAM v. State of NCT of Delhi

07 Oct 2024 · Amit Mahajan · 2024:DHC:7830
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Pre-arrest bail was denied in a narcotics case involving commercial quantity heroin, emphasizing the need for custodial interrogation and caution in granting bail at the initial investigation stage.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant pre-arrest bail Section 438 CrPC NDPS Act commercial quantity narcotics

National Insurance Company Limited v. Nisha Jha and Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:8224

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, upholding the compensation award for death due to a collision with a negligently parked truck, affirming contributory negligence deduction and interest at 9% per annum.

motor_vehicles/compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 contributory negligence compensation income tax deduction

Abhishek @ Abhishek Nagar & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Oct 2024 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2024:DHC:7966

The Delhi High Court refused to quash an FIR under section 307 IPC involving a minor victim, holding that settlements in serious offences must be voluntary and just, and quashing powers exercised sparingly in the interest of justice and society.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR section 307 IPC inherent powers settlement agreement

Mahinder Singh & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) Through SHO PS Palam Village & Anr.

07 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7760

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC matrimonial dispute amicable settlement

Anil Minocha v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7792

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under sexual offence provisions following an amicable settlement, emphasizing the scope of inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process in appropriate cases.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement sexual offences

Rahul @ Jitender Kumar v. State Govt NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7794

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354, 354D, 506, and 509 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, exercising inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC with conditions to prevent abuse of court process.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 354 IPC

Rahul Mathur & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

07 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7795

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A and 406 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC Section 406 IPC amicable settlement

Usha Kaushal v. State of NCT Delhi

07 Oct 2024 · Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:7766

The Delhi High Court quashed a cheating FIR under Section 420 IPC following an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the Court's power under Section 528 BNSS to prevent abuse of process in offences with predominant civil dispute elements.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 528 BNSS quashing of FIR Section 420 IPC amicable settlement

Aryans College of Education v. National Council for Teacher Education

07 Oct 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:7945
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging withdrawal of B.Ed. recognition by NCTE, holding that the material cause of action arose outside its jurisdiction and applying the doctrine of forum conveniens to decline jurisdiction.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 cause of action forum conveniens territorial jurisdiction

Diwakar Batra v. State

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7836

The Delhi High Court disposed of an appeal against grant of Letters of Administration following an amicable settlement and appointed the beneficiary brother as guardian ad litem for the mentally disabled sibling.

civil appeal_dismissed Letters of Administration Indian Succession Act Will Probate

Devasia Thomas v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:7817
Cites 4 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that compensation for death by electrocution due to alleged negligence cannot be granted under writ jurisdiction when facts are disputed, but awarded ex-gratia relief while allowing civil remedies.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 compensation electrocution res ipsa loquitur

Asian Hotels North Ltd v. Yes Bank Ltd & Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:7754

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint and restrained lenders from coercive recovery actions pending adjudication of a suit challenging loan recall and enforcement actions under the OTR scheme.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order VI Rule 17 CPC amendment of plaint One-Time Restructuring (OTR) loan recall notice

Vandana Bagla v. M/S. M Cars Studio and Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7814

The Court upheld the Trial Court's order referring the dispute under a lease agreement to arbitration, holding that the arbitration clause mandates arbitration and does not permit court adjudication of the dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed arbitration clause Section 8 Arbitration and Conciliation Act sole arbitrator lease agreement

Lalit Tiwari v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7813

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging demolition of unauthorized constructions, holding that prior admissions negated the claim of protected prior construction under the relevant Delhi laws.

property petition_dismissed demolition order unauthorized construction National Capital Territory of Delhi Laws (Special Provisions) Second Act, 2011 Article 227 Constitution of India

Lekh Raj v. Ram Kishan

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7811

The Delhi High Court allowed transfer of a Civil Suit to the court hearing the related Execution Petition to avoid conflicting orders, while refusing consolidation due to differing scopes.

civil appeal_allowed consolidation of cases clubbing of matters transfer of suit execution petition

Mohd Haroon v. North Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7809

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Trial Court's refusal to appoint a Local Commissioner, holding that such discretionary orders are not subject to interference under Article 227 unless manifestly perverse.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Order XXVI Rule 9 CPC Local Commissioner supervisory jurisdiction

FIITJEE LTD v. K K SURESHKUMAR

07 Oct 2024 · Manoj Jain · 2024:DHC:7807

Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the challenge to NCDRC orders must be filed in the High Court where the cause of action arose.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India jurisdiction National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission