Delhi High Court
47,108 judgments
Nitin Arora v. Ritu Seth
The Delhi High Court allowed the tenant to rely on additional documents regarding the landlady's other properties during arguments on leave to defend in an eviction petition based on bona fide requirement, emphasizing procedural fairness without prejudging merits.
Alcatel Lucent India Limited v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr
The Delhi High Court remanded transfer pricing appeals for fresh consideration of comparability of certain companies, emphasizing the need for functional similarity and proper segmental data in determining Arm's Length Price under the Income Tax Act.
Rajnibhai H Doshi v. Mahendra Kumar Narrottam Das Gandhi
The Delhi High Court held it lacked territorial jurisdiction to entertain the petition under Article 227 challenging NCDRC orders and allowed withdrawal with liberty to approach the jurisdictional High Court.
Sushil Kumar Sahdev v. M/S S.K Finance and Leasing Co. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed the trial court to expeditiously dispose of the respondent's Section 8 arbitration application and the petitioner's amendment application within three months, emphasizing party cooperation.
S.B. Enterprises v. Shree Ganesh Steel Traders
The High Court allowed the petitioner to examine an additional witness contrary to an earlier undertaking, subject to conditions and costs, to prevent prejudice and delay in a recovery suit.
United India Insurance Co Ltd v. Sterlite Power Transmission Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the mandatory limitation period for filing a reply under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 cannot be extended, and negligence of counsel does not justify condonation of delay.
Amrit Pal Kaur; Harpreet Kaur; Simarpreet Kaur v. Harcharan Singh Josh
The Delhi High Court upheld a possession decree in favor of a co-owner of leasehold property based on an oral family settlement dividing possession without a formal partition suit.
Roshan Lal Dhanka v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed expert re-evaluation of a candidate’s disability to determine eligibility for MBBS admission, emphasizing individualized assessment over categorical exclusion under disability rights law.
St. Stephen's College v. University of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that St. Stephen's College must adhere to the University's fixed seat matrix and admission policies for Christian minority quota seats, affirming that Article 30 rights are subject to reasonable regulations and directed admission of eligible minority students accordingly.
InterDigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Samsung Patent License Agreement must be disclosed to defendants' in-house representatives under a confidentiality club, as court-ordered disclosure is permitted under the agreement's confidentiality clause with adequate safeguards.
Interdigital Technology Corporation & Ors. v. Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed plaintiffs to file additional documents with expert evidence in a SEP infringement suit, holding that inadvertent omission due to technical glitches constitutes reasonable cause under Order XI Rule 1(5) CPC, and admissibility will be tested at trial.
D.V. Singh v. Usha Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a defamation suit, holding that statements made in quasi-judicial proceedings before the Registrar of Cooperative Societies enjoy absolute privilege and that failure to prove communication to a third party defeats defamation claims.
Amit Sharma v. Union of India and Ors
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging disciplinary proceedings and attachment order against a BSF officer for unauthorized HRA claims, holding that such factual disputes are to be decided in the inquiry and no prima facie mala fide was established.
S. P. Rath v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking full reimbursement of TA and compensation, holding that unchallenged departmental inquiry findings on fraudulent claims cannot be re-examined under Article 226.
J v. The State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and proceedings under Sections 376/363/366/367 IPC and POCSO Act considering the matrimonial alliance, disputed age of prosecutrix, and absence of prima facie evidence, holding continuation would be abuse of process.
Rohit Soni & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A/406 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties, holding that continuing proceedings would be an abuse of process.
Mukesh Kumar v. State (NCT of Delhi) & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 354A, 354D, and 506 IPC based on an amicable settlement between family members, emphasizing the scope of Section 482 CrPC to prevent abuse of court process in minor offences.
Gaurav Bakshi and Others v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Others
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
RR v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of a juvenile aged 16-18 accused of a heinous offence to the Children Court after proper preliminary assessment of his mental and physical capacity under the Juvenile Justice Act, dismissing the petition challenging this decision.
Shri Bhagwan & Ors. v. The State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 323, 354, and 509 IPC arising from a minor family dispute following an amicable settlement, exercising its inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC.