Delhi High Court
46,774 judgments
Pulin Comtrade Limited v. The Handicrafts and Handlooms Exports Corporation of India Ltd.
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes remanded by a prior order setting aside part of an arbitral award.
M S SIS LIMITED v. M S LUMINOUS POWER TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6)(a) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after parties failed to mutually agree, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
Luminous Power Technologies Private Limited v. SIS Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after parties failed to mutually agree, directing arbitration under DIAC rules.
CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SANJAY MATHEWS PROPRIETOR OF M/S BENKUS MOTORS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, directing arbitration of disputes arising from a Credit Facility Agreement due to respondents' default and non-response.
Dr Shama Mohamed v. Smt Sanju Verma and Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from broadcasting and sharing defamatory statements against a political spokesperson, balancing freedom of speech with the right to reputation.
Rohit Singh v. Parimal Bhattacharjee
The Delhi High Court held that a decree for arrears of rent and mesne profits cannot be granted under Order XII Rule 6 CPC beyond the relief of possession prayed for, setting aside such reliefs while upholding the possession decree.
Rajhans Realtors Pvt Ltd v. Rajinder Kumar Goyal & Another
The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord’s eviction petition under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that bona fide requirement for possession is to be assessed from the landlord’s perspective and the tenant cannot dictate the landlord’s business needs.
Smt. Anu Gupta v. Income Tax Officer Ward 54(1) Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the issuance of a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on credible information suggestive of escaped income through off-market share transactions and accommodation entries.
Yogesh Kumar Goel & Anr. v. Saurabh Bhardwaj
The Delhi High Court allowed the revision petition, holding that the suit was filed within the extended limitation period granted due to COVID-19, setting aside orders dismissing the suit on limitation grounds.
Commissioner CGST Delhi South v. Air India Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that the extended limitation period under Section 73(1) Finance Act, 1994 cannot be invoked without specific allegations of deliberate suppression of facts or fraud in the Show Cause Notice.
STIC Travels Private Limited v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a 14-year delay in adjudicating a service tax Show Cause Notice renders the proceedings barred by limitation and quashed the re-initiation notice issued in 2023.
Surender Kumar Badhwar v. Abhay Pratap Singh Raghuwanshi
The High Court dismissed the revision petition upholding the trial court's order rejecting a decree on admissions in an ejectment suit due to absence of clear admissions and presence of disputed factual defenses.
Manoj Arora v. Shri Jatinder Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the revision petition challenging the rejection of an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that court fee assessment depends on the relief granted and cannot be contested at the preliminary stage.
Kamal Mahajan & Ors. v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Anand Singh Panwar and Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed retrospective grant of replacement pay scale benefits from 01.01.1996 to similarly placed CAPF personnel, following earlier judicial precedents, subject to limitation on arrears.
Harish Chand & Ors. v. The State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC read with Dowry Prohibition Act following an amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce between the parties.
Vikash @ Vicky v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted bail to an accused charged with commercial quantity narcotics offences under the NDPS Act due to prolonged pre-trial custody and procedural lapses, emphasizing that statutory bail restrictions do not bar bail where trial delay violates fundamental rights.
Neeraj Mittal v. Subhash Sachdeva & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Registrar of the State Consumer Commission to procure records from the District Forum to facilitate hearing of a seven-year pending appeal, without imposing a strict timeline for disposal.
Kumeshwar Dayal Sammi v. The State (Govt. of NCT Delhi) & Ors.
The Delhi High Court declared an earlier family settlement and relinquishment deed null and void and directed fresh execution of documents to give effect to a court-recorded family settlement under Order XXXII A CPC.
KKH FINVEST PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. v. JONAS HAGGARD & ORS.
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only a prima facie view on the existence of arbitration agreement and non-signatories' status is required, leaving complex jurisdictional issues to the arbitral tribunal, and dismissed the petition seeking appointment of arbitrator against non-signatories and consolidation of proceedings.