Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Sachin Sharma v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) and Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:8932

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash FIR and charges under Section 370 IPC and Section 23 JJ Act, holding that prima facie offences were established and inherent powers to quash must be exercised sparingly after charges are framed.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR Section 370 IPC trafficking

Louis Vuitton Malletier v. Abdulkhaliq Abdulkader Chamadia & Ors.

12 Nov 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:8955

The Delhi High Court granted a permanent injunction and ancillary reliefs against defendants selling counterfeit Louis Vuitton products, decreeing the suit ex-parte under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC due to defendants' failure to contest.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off permanent injunction Order VIII Rule 10 CPC

Abdul Salam v. GNCT of Delhi & Anr.

12 Nov 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:8959

The Delhi High Court directed the authorities to provide the petitioner a hearing and pass a speaking order on his citizenship status after considering all documents, without deciding the merits.

administrative petition_dismissed Procedural birth certificate cancellation citizenship verification right to be heard speaking order

M Balan v. Union of India & Ors.

11 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8724-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to treat the petitioner's plea for an additional inquiry as a representation and pass a reasoned order within 12 weeks, without expressing any opinion on merits or jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Court of Inquiry Writ Petition Territorial Jurisdiction Representation

Ajay Darshan Behera v. Jamia Millia Islamia

11 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8733-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Statute 37 of Jamia Millia Islamia Act, rejecting the petitioner's challenge that it violates Articles 14 and 16 by lacking inquiry procedure before removal of teachers.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Statute 37 Jamia Millia Islamia removal of teachers Articles 14 and 16

Murlidhar v. EX SPR (MACP NK) P Arun Kumar

11 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8700-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension and broad banding to an ex-serviceman whose depressive disorder was held attributable to military service despite contrary medical board findings.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant disability pension armed forces tribunal medical board opinion attributable to service

Rakshit Khurana v. Indus Tower Limited

11 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:8761-DB

The Delhi High Court held that inter se shareholder disputes concerning company management do not constitute commercial disputes under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015, and dismissed the appeal challenging the plaint's return.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant commercial dispute Commercial Courts Act, 2015 shareholder dispute derivative suit

Rita Sharma v. Ashok Kumar

11 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9560
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by accepting proved ITR income, recognizing major sons as dependents, and awarding loss of consortium to each legal heir.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 loss of dependency income tax returns personal expenses deduction

Shakuntala Devi v. Mohan Das

11 Nov 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024 SCC OnLine Del 47

The Delhi High Court allowed the landlord's revision petition setting aside the dismissal of eviction petition, holding that bona fide requirement was proved and alternative accommodation was unsuitable under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958.

property appeal_allowed Significant bona fide requirement eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternative accommodation

Panchhi Petha Store v. Union of India & Ors

11 Nov 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9082
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that the Regional Director under Section 16 of the Companies Act cannot decide trademark ownership in company name rectification applications and set aside the impugned order rejecting the petitioner's application.

corporate appeal_allowed Significant Section 16 Companies Act 2013 Regional Director jurisdiction Company name rectification Trademark ownership

M/S PAUL ENGINEERING WORKS AND ANR v. SHRI RAM DIYA SHARMA

11 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9036

The Delhi High Court upheld the allowance of amendment clarifying delay rather than refusal in a suit for specific performance, holding that limitation begins only on clear refusal when no date is fixed for performance.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Specific Performance Agreement to Sell Limitation Order VI Rule 17 CPC

Usha Jain & Anr. v. M/S Vigneshwara Developwell Pvt Ltd

11 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8847-DB

The High Court held that creditors must claim dues through the Official Liquidator in winding-up proceedings and cannot claim preferential payment of amounts deposited in earlier petitions.

corporate appeal_dismissed Significant winding up company liquidation creditor claims preferential payment

BVM Engineering Industries Limited v. Imperia Heights Private Ltd & Anr.

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8769
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from redevelopment agreements, directing the arbitrator to encourage settlement before adjudication.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 30(1) Sole Arbitrator

Sonam Agarwal v. DCM Ltd

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8770
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that objections of non-joinder of parties do not bar arbitration where an arbitration agreement exists.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) appointment of arbitrator arbitration agreement

Mohd. Khalid v. Hindustan Construction Company Limited

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8767

The Delhi High Court dismissed a Section 11 arbitration petition for lack of jurisdiction, holding that only courts at the agreed seat of arbitration, Mumbai, can entertain such petitions.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration seat of arbitration jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

M/S Shivansh Manpower and Security v. M/S Yuantai International Supply Chain Management Pvt Ltd

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8725
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a manpower services agreement, affirming the binding nature of the arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Arbitration clause

Jaipal Singh v. Delhi Development Authority

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8726
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a delayed construction contract with DDA, affirming the validity and enforceability of the arbitration clause.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act sole arbitrator appointment contractual dispute resolution

M/S. GANESHA ECOSPHERE LTD v. M/S. SVP INDUSTRIES LTD

11 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8768
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that the arbitration clause specifying Delhi as the seat confers exclusive jurisdiction, appointed a sole arbitrator, and rejected contrary jurisdictional objections based on invoices and cause of action.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration clause seat of arbitration jurisdiction Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act

Sandeep Hooda v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-7, Delhi & Anr.

11 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8854-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that exemption under Section 54 of the Income Tax Act is not available where the appellant failed to construct a residential house with basic amenities within the prescribed period.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 54 Income Tax Act capital gains exemption residential house construction basic amenities

Ms. S v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

11 Nov 2024 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8714

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that bail should not be cancelled without supervening circumstances affecting a fair trial and that the complainant had notice of the bail hearing.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail cancellation notice to complainant Section 439(2) CrPC Section 482 CrPC