Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)-1 v. M/s Adma Solutions Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that a mere change of company name does not invalidate penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act, but penalty orders passed beyond the prescribed limitation period under Section 275(1)(c) are unsustainable.
Cdr. Siddharth Sharma, IN v. CDR AK Srivastava (Retd.)
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired naval officer, ruling that denial based solely on financial grounds despite consistent medical opinion was impermissible.
Lt Col S K Jha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's rejection of the petitioner's complaint against denial of promotion and adverse ACR, holding no mala fide or sufficient grounds for interference.
Om Narayan Mishra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking reinstatement and retiral benefits on the ground of inordinate delay and laches, holding that repeated representations do not excuse a 27-year delay in approaching the Court.
Mohit Yadav v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the Physical Standard Test result declaring the petitioner unfit after independent medical measurements confirmed compliance with prescribed physical standards, allowing him to continue in the recruitment process.
Mini Stanly v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to grant the petitioner retrospective promotional benefits and seniority on a common seniority list for male and female officers, reaffirming the prohibition of gender-based discrimination in promotions.
Nagesh Ratan Daberao v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging medical disqualification for CRPF recruitment, holding that medical fitness must be determined at the time of Medical Board examination and subsequent reports cannot override that decision.
Sgt Anoop Kumar PS v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's dismissal of a review application seeking premature discharge, holding that the petitioner must challenge the Speaking Order before the tribunal and that grant of relief to others does not mandate identical relief.
Sachin Negi v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an Army Hospital for a candidate declared unfit due to defective colour vision, allowing him a fair chance to participate in the recruitment process.
Union of India v. Ex Lem R Jaideep
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension for seizure disorder, ruling the disability attributable to military service despite contrary medical opinion.
Rajesh Kumar Jha v. Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited
The Delhi High Court upheld the removal of an employee for failing to meet mandatory government sector experience criteria in a recruitment advertisement, affirming the limited scope of judicial review over departmental inquiries.
AstraZeneca AB & Anr. v. Westcoast Pharmaceutical Works Limited
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of AstraZeneca, restraining Westcoast Pharmaceutical from infringing its patent on Osimertinib, due to the defendant's failure to file a defense and undertaking not to infringe.
Opella Healthcare Group v. Vaibhav Vohra & Anr.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's deceptively similar trademark and copyright registrations for 'PHENSERYL', upholding the petitioner's prior rights in 'PHENSEDYL' and emphasizing the need to maintain register purity and prevent consumer confusion in pharmaceutical trademarks.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7 v. Sunlight Tour and Travels Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld that reassessment under Section 147 requires assessing the income forming the basis of reopening before any other income can be assessed, dismissing the Revenue's appeal against deletion of addition and quashing of reassessment.
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Jonas Woodhead and Sons India Limited
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to Aktiebolaget Volvo against Jonas Woodhead & Sons India Ltd. for unauthorized use and infringement of the well-known 'VOLVO' trademark on vehicle parts.
COMVIVA TECHNOLOGIES LIMITED v. ASSISTANT CONTROLLER OF PATENTS & DESIGN
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and held that a computer-implemented invention providing a technical solution for secure electronic payment authentication is patentable and not excluded as a business method or computer program per se under Section 3(k) of the Patents Act.
Ghayour, Advocates v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's cognizance order under Section 186 IPC for non-compliance with Section 195 CrPC but refused to quash the FIR and chargesheet, affirming the police's power to investigate despite procedural bars on courts.
MS Axalta Coating Systems India Pvt. Ltd. v. MS NCS Auto Hub Private Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that the arbitration clause's venue is the seat of arbitration and that jurisdictional objections are to be decided by the arbitrator.
Bal Kishan & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against conviction under Section 323 IPC, upheld the probation order, and directed the appellants to pay the compensation as ordered by the trial court.
Jayant Budhiraja v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Section 23 of the Juvenile Justice Act against the petitioner for employing a juvenile under 14 years, holding that a prima facie case was made out and defenses are to be examined at trial.