Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Indu Wahi v. Vinod Kumar

28 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9396

The Delhi High Court held that a suit for Specific Performance cannot be summarily dismissed under Order VII Rule 11 CPC merely because the defendant lacks a Conveyance Deed, as ownership and capacity are factual issues for trial.

civil petition_dismissed Specific Performance Order VII Rule 11 CPC Cause of Action Conveyance Deed

Munesh & Anr v. Minendra Kumar & Ors

28 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9398

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal to enhance compensation by holding that filing of a chargesheet and credible eyewitness testimony suffice to prove rash and negligent driving under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, overruling the Tribunal's contrary finding.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 163A rash and negligent driving

Religare Enterprises Ltd v. National Faceless Assessment Centre & Anr

28 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9421-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the National Faceless Assessment Centre lacked jurisdiction to pass an order superseding a concluded assessment order given effect to appellate directions, setting aside the impugned order.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 14A faceless assessment National Faceless Assessment Centre

Prof Sachidanand Sinha v. Jawaharlal Nehru University

28 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:9459

The Delhi High Court held that Leave Encashment cannot be withheld without a specific order under Rule 39(3) CCS Leave Rules and directed JNU to release the petitioner's Leave Encashment with interest.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Leave Encashment Gratuity Rule 39(3) CCS Leave Rules 1972 Disciplinary proceedings

Mukesh Sain & Ors. v. Pragati Power Corporation Limited and Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:9457

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the 2012 Unified Promotion Policy and combined seniority lists on grounds of delay, laches, and estoppel, holding that settled seniority cannot be disturbed after unreasonable delay.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant delay and laches estoppel and acquiescence combined seniority list Unified Promotion Policy 2012

Vivek Gaur v. ARG Outlier Media Private Limited and Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Vikas Mahajan · 2024:DHC:9547

The Delhi High Court granted an ad interim injunction restraining media defendants from publishing defamatory articles falsely alleging the plaintiff's arrest and proclaimed offender status in cheating/fraud cases, emphasizing the balance between freedom of speech and right to reputation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant defamation injunction freedom of speech and expression right to reputation

Huawei Telecommunications India Company Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2

28 Nov 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9573-DB

The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings remanded by the ITAT must be completed within the statutory limitation period under Section 153 of the Income Tax Act, failing which the return must be accepted and refund with interest granted.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153 limitation ITAT remand Transfer Pricing Officer

Huawei Telecommunications India Company Private Limited v. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Circle 2, Delhi

28 Nov 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9574-DB

The Delhi High Court held that assessment proceedings pursuant to an ITAT remand are time barred if no order is passed within the statutory period, mandating acceptance of the income tax return filed by the assessee.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 153 limitation ITAT remand pronouncement of order

M/S National Insurance Company Ltd v. Neeru Devi & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9641

The Delhi High Court upheld a motor accident compensation award, affirming reliance on eyewitness testimony and bank loan EMIs as valid indicators of the deceased's income.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim eyewitness testimony rash and negligent driving income assessment

Rajeev Sharma v. Union of India and Others

28 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:9848

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking the right to pray at a public cremation ground, holding that such practice is not an essential religious right protected under Article 25 and is subject to public order restrictions.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 25 Constitution of India freedom of religion essential religious practice test public order

Sarita Singh & Ors. v. Mohd Irfan & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2009 ACJ 287 Delhi

The Delhi High Court allowed the motor accident claim appeal, holding that the offending vehicle's involvement was established on preponderance of probabilities despite FIR discrepancies, awarding compensation to the deceased's family.

motor_accident_claims appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 Section 166 Section 140 Charge-sheet

Suresh Subramaniam v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9235-DB

The Delhi High Court held that removal of a district from the Security Related Expenditure Scheme terminates entitlement to retain government quarters from the effective date, but directed respondents to consider petitioner’s representation for reasonable retention considering late communication and family circumstances.

administrative other Significant Security Related Expenditure Scheme Government residential accommodation Central Government General Pool Residential Accommodation Rules, 2017 Retention of quarters

Umed Singh & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9240-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of petitioners' candidature for ITBP sports quota recruitment due to non-recognition of their sports federation certificates as per the advertisement terms.

administrative petition_dismissed sports quota recruitment recognition of sports federation Ministry of Youth Affairs and Sports Indo-Tibetan Border Police

Roshni v. Daya Wanti & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav

The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that unregistered documents like GPA and Agreement to Sell do not transfer property title and that eviction decrees can be passed against unauthorized occupants denying landlord-tenant relationship.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant registered deed of conveyance General Power of Attorney Agreement to Sell Section 53A Transfer of Property Act

Rajiv@Monu v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

28 Nov 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9201-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to contradictions in prosecution evidence and failure to prove common intention beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC reasonable doubt ocular evidence

Sumit Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

28 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9312-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s challenge to his transfer for non-cooperation with medical examination and directed the respondents to decide the suspension period upon representation.

administrative petition_dismissed medical examination transfer posting suspension period Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985

Robin Kumar v. Central Reserve Police Force and Another

28 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9264-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging medical fitness in CRPF recruitment for lack of territorial jurisdiction, upholding the jurisdiction clause in the recruitment advertisement.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction recruitment advertisement Physical Standard Test tattoo

Kamla Devi v. Union of India & Anr.

28 Nov 2024 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2024:DHC:9261-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition seeking employment after a 27-year delay, holding that unexplained delay and laches bar relief under Article 226 despite parity with other successful candidates.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 Constitution of India delay and laches writ petition regular employment

NJ BIKES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. SUZUKI MOTORCYCLE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

28 Nov 2024 · Subramonium Prasad · 2024:DHC:9736

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award upholding the lawful termination of a dealership agreement and held that the limitation period under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act is absolute and not extendable.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation Dealership agreement termination Public policy in arbitration

Nowa Bai & Anr. v. State

28 Nov 2024 · Prathiba M. Singh; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9200-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 302 IPC due to infirmities and lack of corroboration in dying declarations, emphasizing cautious scrutiny and benefit of doubt in criminal trials.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration Section 302 IPC Section 34 IPC Section 498A IPC