Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Vinod alias Ganja v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:8763

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking premature release, holding that the Sentence Review Board duly considered and rejected the petitioner’s plea in accordance with the 2004 guidelines, and directed the petitioner to surrender within three weeks.

criminal petition_dismissed premature release Sentence Review Board 2004 SRB Guidelines Article 21

Sandeep Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:9281

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail, holding that absence of supervening circumstances and completed investigation preclude bail cancellation under Section 439(2) CrPC.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of bail Section 439(2) CrPC supervening circumstances misuse of bail

Sandeep Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:9244

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking cancellation of bail granted to a CBI officer accused of kidnapping, holding that in absence of supervening circumstances and with investigation complete, bail cannot be cancelled.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant cancellation of bail Section 439(2) CrPC supervening circumstances misuse of bail

SHRI KR ANAND v. NEW DELHI MUNICIPAL COUNCIL

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8771
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite limitation objections, which are to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator prima facie arbitration agreement limitation objection

National Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Satish Kumar Chawla & Ors

13 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9216
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation awarded for injuries caused by rash driving outside a workshop, confirming the driver's license validity and the method of income assessment for compensation.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Compensation Rash and negligent driving Driving license competency

Deepak v. Satya & Ors.

13 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9170

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing the functional disability assessment to 100% permanent disability while upholding the income assessment based on unskilled minimum wages.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 compensation enhancement permanent disability functional disability assessment

M.V. Omni Projects (India) Ltd. v. Union of India

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:7874
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate contractual disputes between M.V. Omni Projects and Northern Railway, following prior setting aside of arbitral awards.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Independent arbitrator

Principal Commissioner, CGST v. M/S. Federal Mogul Goetze India Limited

13 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8848-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an audit report does not constitute an order of determination barring eligibility under VCES, and a show cause notice disqualifies declaration only for dues covered by it, dismissing the Revenue's appeal.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Voluntary Compliance Encouragement Scheme VCES audit report order of determination

Shri Inder Mohan Bhambri and Others v. MS Landmark Apartments Private Limited

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8823

Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from Builder-Buyer Agreements with arbitration seat in Delhi, affirming the Court's jurisdiction despite an exclusive jurisdiction clause for Gurgaon courts.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 Section 12 appointment of arbitrator

Verizon Trademark Services LLC & Ors. v. Verizon Global & Ors.

13 Nov 2024 · Mini Pushkarna · 2024:DHC:9148

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Verizon, recognizing its 'VERIZON' mark as well-known and permanently restraining defendants from infringing it.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant well-known trademark trademark infringement summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

DELHIVERY LIMITED v. STERNE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8824
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held it has jurisdiction under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to appoint a Sole Arbitrator despite the arbitration seat being at Gurgaon and exclusive jurisdiction clause conferring jurisdiction on courts at New Delhi.

other petition_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act exclusive jurisdiction clause seat of arbitration appointment of arbitrator

DELHIVERY LIMITED v. FASTMILE EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8825
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a delivery services agreement where parties failed to agree on an arbitrator.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Arbitration agreement

DELHIVERY LIMITED v. FASTMILE EXPRESS PRIVATE LIMITED

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8822
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, confirming the court's limited role to verify the arbitration agreement's existence when parties fail to agree on arbitrator appointment.

civil appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Arbitration agreement

Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax- 2 v. Ciena Communications India Pvt. Ltd.

13 Nov 2024 · Vibhu BakhrU; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8849-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's finding that payments for remote technical support and equipment repair did not constitute fees for technical services under the Income Tax Act and India-USA DTAA, dismissing the Revenue's appeal for tax withholding.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant fees for technical services make available clause Section 9(1)(vii) Income Tax Act Article 12 DTAA

Wadhwa General Store & Anr. v. M/S Hindustan Unilever Ltd

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8871
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding the parties' agreed appointment procedure invalid and directing arbitration under DIAC rules.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Sole Arbitrator appointment Redistribution and Stockist Agreement

Sh. Jitender Sharma v. Sh. Nikhil Bansal & Anr.

13 Nov 2024 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2024:DHC:9029

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for permanent disability and future prospects in a motor accident claim, applying the Pranay Sethi principle and rejecting claims lacking evidence.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Permanent Disability Functional Disability Future Prospects

Mahalaxmi Electronics v. M/S Xtreme Media Pvt Ltd

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8819
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that at the stage of appointing an arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration Act, only a prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is required, and appointed a sole arbitrator despite the respondent's claim of MOU cancellation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Appointment of arbitrator Prima facie existence

Aakash Educational Services Limited v. Ravi Kant

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8820
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate employment-related disputes where parties failed to mutually appoint an arbitrator.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Appointment of sole arbitrator Service Rules dispute

Vardaan Synthetics v. Pawan Traders

13 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8844
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from an arbitration clause in invoices between Vardaan Synthetics and Pawan Traders.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 petition appointment of Sole Arbitrator arbitration clause

Shri Jai Bhagwan & Anr. v. Land and Building Department

13 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh · 2024:DHC:8904

The Delhi High Court set aside the rejection of alternate plot allotment for land acquisition claimants due to non-furnishing of adverse report and remanded for fresh consideration with opportunity to be heard.

administrative remanded Significant alternate plot allotment land acquisition natural justice Tehsildar report