Delhi High Court
38,124 judgments
Renu Kumari Panghal v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the cancellation of a provisional appointment due to failure to join within the prescribed period, affirming that extensions beyond six months are permissible only in exceptional circumstances and public interest.
Ravi Bala Nijhawan v. Rannvijay Singh
The court held that a compromise deed between parents cannot bind a minor child's property rights, and thus a suit by the minor challenging such a deed is maintainable.
M/S ARUN KUMAR PUSHPDEEP INFRASTRUCTURE (JV) v. UNION OF INDIA & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate payment disputes arising from a delayed railway construction contract.
U P State Road Transport Corporation v. Sapna & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals challenging compensation awarded for a fatal road accident, holding sole negligence of the bus driver, affirming enhanced Loss of Consortium, and upholding 8% interest on compensation.
Court on Its Own Motion v. State
The Delhi High Court held that the proviso to Section 311A CrPC requiring prior arrest before obtaining specimen signatures is directory, not mandatory, and constitutionally valid, balancing investigative needs with fundamental rights.
Maersk Line India Private Limited v. Union of India
Delhi High Court directs Customs and CONCOR to expedite de-stuffing, disposal, and release of long-detained import containers, emphasizing lawful process and timely relief to petitioners.
Sanya Kumar and Saloni Ambastha v. Serious Fraud Investigation Office
Delhi High Court granted regular bail to ex-directors of Cosmic Structures Ltd. accused of fraud, recognizing their bona fide revival efforts and prolonged custody amid delayed trial.
Ansarul Hasan v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a police constable under the Prevention of Corruption Act due to failure of the prosecution to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt amid material contradictions and procedural lapses.
Deepak Chaudhary v. State NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that while up to three cheque dishonour complaints can be tried jointly under Section 219 CrPC, joint trial of eight complaints is impermissible without legislative amendment, and upheld the trial court's order rejecting the petitioner's application for joint trial of all eight cases.
Mohammed Atique v. Aparajita Atique
The Delhi High Court upheld a Family Court decree of divorce on the ground of cruelty under the Special Marriage Act, rejecting the appellant's challenge based on prior religious conversion and res judicata.
IN2IT TECHNOLOGIES PRIVATE LIMITED v. Piesting Services Private Limited & Ors
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 where parties failed to mutually agree, allowing jurisdictional objections to be decided by the arbitral tribunal.
DELHI GYMKHANA CLUB LTD. v. DELHI POLLUTION CONTROL COMMITTEE
The Delhi High Court directed the NDMC to decide the petitioner's borewell regularization application by a speaking order after hearing, while extending interim relief to operate borewells pending decision.
G4S Limited & Anr. v. Grace Security and Services & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment and permanent injunction against defendants for trademark infringement and passing off of the plaintiffs' registered 'G4S' marks, awarding damages and costs due to defendants' non-appearance and continued infringement.
Shri Sunil Dhingra v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging registration of a sale deed based on a false NOC, holding that pending criminal and civil proceedings preclude further writ relief.
Jindal Saw Ltd. v. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court set aside inconsistent notices and orders under Sections 148A(b) and 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, holding that the assessee was denied a fair opportunity to respond to allegations of escaped income.
Evergreen Sweet House v. JV Evergreen Sweets and Treats & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining defendant from using the mark "Evergreen" in sweets business, affirming prior user rights and passing off despite defendant's trademark registrations.
Pradeep Kumar Nehra v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the preventive detention order under COFEPOSA against a petitioner already in judicial custody due to non-application of mind regarding the improbability of his release and propensity to commit future offenses.
Sahjan Ali v. State through SHO PS Madhu Vihar
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under POCSO and IPC for lack of clear evidence of sexual assault, emphasizing the need for reasoned analysis and proof beyond ambiguous terms like 'physical relations' when the minor victim's testimony indicates consent.
Mohd Abdul Rehman v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Mohd. Abdul Rehman under Sections 18 and 18B of UAPA for conspiracy and preparatory acts towards terrorism based on cumulative circumstantial evidence including illegal travel, recruitment, and inflammatory speeches.
Pritam Singh v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court granted suspension of sentence pending appeal to an appellant convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, emphasizing the need for clear proof of demand and acceptance of bribe and careful assessment of identification evidence.