Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Rajiv Khanna v. M/S. TSG International Marketing Pvt Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed an appeal condoning an 11-month delay in filing a restoration application to revive a suit dismissed for non-prosecution, emphasizing the fundamental right to prosecute legal remedies and the interests of justice.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Anchit Suri
The High Court set aside the Sessions Court's discharge order and held that possession of a fake UN passport raises sufficient prima facie suspicion to frame charges under Sections 420, 468, and 471 IPC, emphasizing the correct standard of proof at the charge framing stage.
Arjun Prasad Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed bail to a proclaimed offender who purged himself of proceedings under Section 82 Cr.P.C. in compliance with the Court's directions, setting aside the Sessions Court's rejection of bail.
Dhruva Goel v. M/S Chetanya Buildcon Pvt Ltd & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld its decree for specific performance directing execution of the sale deed through an Officer of the Court, dismissing the owners' application to recall the decree based on alleged lack of instructions to counsel.
Jehangir D. Mehta v. Investor Education and Protection Fund Authority
The Delhi High Court directed the competent authority to conduct a de novo hearing on the petitioner's claim for transfer of shares and payment of dividends under a Letter of Administration, allowing the petitioner to be heard and produce evidence.
Joginder Singh @ Joginder Rana v. National Investigation Agency
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's bail plea under Section 43D(5) UAPA, holding that prima facie evidence of involvement in terrorism and possession of arms justified denial of bail despite the appellant's claims of innocence.
Sudhir Kumar v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with sexual assault and blackmail, holding that initial consent does not extend to coercive acts involving recording and dissemination of private videos.
Chitranshu Pandey v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused where CCTV and mobile data negated his presence at the crime scene despite serious allegations under BNSS and POCSO Act.
Priyanshu Pandey v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted anticipatory bail to the accused after finding that CCTV and mobile location evidence did not support the prosecution's allegations of his presence at the crime scene.
Vikash @ Bhim v. The State of NCT of Delhi
Anticipatory bail was denied to the petitioner accused of conspiracy, use of firearms, and forgery in a property dispute due to the gravity of offences and necessity of custodial interrogation.
Suvidha Yadav v. Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the DSSSB's discretion to fix cut-off marks higher than advertised minimum qualifying marks, dismissing the petitioner's claim for selection despite scoring below the cut-off.
The State (GNCT of Delhi) v. Sahil Chopra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the discharge of accused in a rape case where the victim's statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. did not support the allegations, emphasizing the limited role of the Court at the charge framing stage to form only a prima facie view.
Vishal @ Bunty v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder inside a jail van, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the sufficiency of police evidence to deny bail at the trial stage.
Salman alias Samma v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of an accused charged with murder inside a jail van, holding that the gravity of the offence and evidence on record do not warrant bail at this stage.
Seema v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to procedural lapses and inordinate trial delay, emphasizing the right to speedy trial and evolving standards of transparency in investigations.
Janta Party v. Election Commission of India
The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of the Election Symbol (Reservation & Allotment) Order, 1968, ruling that only recognised political parties have exclusive rights to reserved election symbols and such symbols do not constitute property rights.
Arjun Prasad Yadav v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the petitioner uncle accused of offences under IPC and POCSO Act, considering contradictory victim statements, clean antecedents, and prior bail granted to main accused.
Anil Kumar Bharti v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the accused uncle in a POCSO case involving a minor victim, considering contradictions in victim's statements and the accused's clean antecedents.
Mukesh Kumar Sharma v. The President of Shahdra Bar Association & Ors.
The Delhi High Court disposed of the petition seeking restoration of Bar Association membership after the Association agreed to restore membership upon payment of dues, without adjudicating on the validity of the challenged rules.
Union of India v. Subhash Kumar Ghosh
The Delhi High Court dismissed the Union of India's review petitions, affirming that financial upgradation granted to employees is not a promotion and that divergent judicial views do not justify review.