Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Ranvir Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

15 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:279

The Delhi High Court condoned a 3416-day delay in filing an appeal and allowed enhanced compensation for land acquired in Village Pochanpur, applying the Supreme Court's precedent in Impulse India Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India.

property appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation enhancement Impulse India case

Manish Dabas v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.

15 Jan 2025 · Vibhu Bakru; Tushar Rao Gedela · 2025:DHC:175-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the rescheduling of a DDA e-auction due to technical glitches, ruling that the highest bid in the original auction does not guarantee success if the auction is fairly extended and all participants are allowed to bid again.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant e-auction Delhi Development Authority Rule 30 DDA Rules 1981 technical glitches

R K Yadav v. Dinesh Kumar

15 Jan 2025 · Chandra Dhari Singh; Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:209-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act is maintainable only against orders imposing punishment for contempt, and dismissed the appeal challenging a non-punitive order directing deposit and release of seized money with interest.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 19 appeal punishment for contempt maintainability of appeal

Indian National Migrant Workers Union v. Sunita Choudhary & Ors.

15 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:235
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed reinstatement of a workman terminated without following Section 33 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, after his exoneration in a sexual harassment inquiry, emphasizing compliance with court orders and legal procedures.

labor petition_dismissed Significant Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33 termination of services contempt petition

Gulam Hazrat Mirzale v. Customs

15 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:189
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of a foreign national accused of trafficking commercial quantity heroin, holding that procedural lapses do not automatically entitle bail under the stringent provisions of Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS bail in narcotics cases commercial quantity heroin

Ritu Raj Jain & Ors. v. Netaji Subhas University of Technology & Anr.

15 Jan 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:178
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition holding that employees appointed to NSUT after 01.01.2001 are bound by the CPF Scheme as per their appointment terms and government policy, and are not entitled to the GPF Scheme despite their appointment date prior to 01.01.2004.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant General Provident Fund Scheme Contributory Provident Fund Scheme Autonomous bodies Pension scheme

Rizwan Ahmed & Anr. v. Subhasish Panda & Ors.

15 Jan 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:179

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against DDA, holding that demolition of unauthorized structures on land lawfully possessed by DDA pursuant to Court directions did not amount to wilful disobedience despite lapse of acquisition proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed Significant land acquisition Section 24(2) LARR Act physical possession demolition

Malaria Research Centre Employees Welfare Association v. K.N. Desiraju

15 Jan 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:180
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against government respondents for alleged non-compliance with employee regularization orders, holding no wilful disobedience was proved and clarifying the scope of contempt jurisdiction.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 wilful disobedience regularization of employees Old Pension Scheme

Gajanan Khanwe v. Union of India & Ors.

15 Jan 2025 · Prathiba M. Singh; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:201-DB

The Delhi High Court directed the Ministry of External Affairs and Indian High Commission in the UK to provide legal aid and assistance to an Indian citizen facing matrimonial and custodial issues abroad, emphasizing the state's duty to protect its citizens overseas.

constitutional petition_allowed Significant habeas corpus Article 226 Constitution of India Section 528 BNSS Indian High Commission

The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

15 Jan 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar · 2025:DHC:164-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT's ruling that Samsung Electronics Korea did not have a Permanent Establishment in India through its subsidiary, as the activities of seconded employees were preparatory or auxiliary and did not constitute carrying on business under the India-Korea DTAA.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Permanent Establishment Double Tax Avoidance Agreement India-Korea DTAA Fixed Place PE

Rohit Kumar v. Income Tax Officer Ward 54 (1), Delhi

15 Jan 2025 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:167-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment notices issued after April 1, 2021 must comply with amended limitation and procedural provisions, and reassessment proceedings completed before the Supreme Court's Ashish Agarwal judgment cannot be reopened.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act Section 148A Income Tax Act Section 149 limitation Finance Act 2021 reassessment

Neeraj Sehrawat v. State NCT of Delhi

15 Jan 2025 · Anup Jairam Bhambhani · 2025:DHC:176

The Delhi High Court dismissed bail for an undertrial accused in a double murder case inside a jail van, holding that prolonged custody alone does not entitle bail when balanced against the accused's serious criminal history and the gravity of the offence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant bail right to speedy trial Article 21 prolonged custody

Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. The Controller of Patents & Anr.

15 Jan 2025 · Amit Bansal · 2025:DHC:158

The Delhi High Court held that a revocation petition under Section 64 of the Patents Act is maintainable and sustainable even after patent expiry and despite a defence under Section 107 in an infringement suit, as the two remedies are distinct and independent.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant revocation petition Section 64 Patents Act Section 107 Patents Act patent infringement

Nitesh Kumar Chandrakar v. Union of India

15 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:184-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court directed the BSF Director General to consider the petitioner's appeal against premature retirement within six weeks, emphasizing that appellate decisions must be communicated by the competent authority with reasons.

administrative petition_allowed premature retirement appeal communication appellate authority Ministry of Home Affairs instructions

G. Shekhar v. Union of India

15 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:193-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination to reassess the petitioner’s fitness for appointment, emphasizing that medical disqualification must be based on proper classification of the condition and specialist opinion.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant medical fitness chronic skin disease Review Medical Examination Uniform Guidelines for Medical Examination Test

Esaiya Kerketta v. Union of India

15 Jan 2025 · Navin Chawla; Shalinder Kaur · 2025:DHC:190-DB

The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination to determine if the petitioner’s asymptomatic skin condition qualifies as a chronic disease affecting fitness for appointment, emphasizing proper medical board evaluation over premature rejection.

administrative other Significant medical fitness chronic skin disease Review Medical Examination Uniform Guidelines for Medical Examination Test

M/S LEO ISPAT LIMITED v. M/S ADI AUTOMOTIVES PVT. LTD.

15 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1138

The Delhi High Court upheld a settlement in a Section 138 N.I. Act case, directing payment of balance interest and quashing complaint cases upon full settlement, dismissing contempt petitions for non-compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act Settlement Agreement Interest on delayed payment Contempt of Courts Act

Shaukat Ali v. The Chief Wild Life Warden and Anr

15 Jan 2025 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2025:DHC:895

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking issuance of an ownership certificate for an elephant, upholding the Supreme Court's interim order restraining such issuance pending final adjudication.

administrative petition_dismissed ownership certificate elephant Supreme Court interim order Contempt of Courts Act

Nupower Renewables Private Limited v. Sammaan Capital Limited

15 Jan 2025 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2025:DHC:713

The Delhi High Court held that disputes under a loan agreement not yet subject to SARFAESI or DRT proceedings are arbitrable and referred the parties to arbitration while declining interim reliefs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 SARFAESI Act Recovery of Debts and Bankruptcy Act arbitrability

State v. Lokesh

15 Jan 2025 · Jasmeet Singh · 2025:DHC:513

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused under Section 324 IPC due to insufficient and contradictory circumstantial evidence and the possibility of self-inflicted injury.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 324 IPC Voluntarily causing hurt Injured witness testimony Circumstantial evidence