Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Kamal Envirotech Pvt. Ltd v. Commissioner of GST and Anr; M/s Zeon Life Sciences Ltd v. Chief Secretary, Government of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 129 of the CGST Act does not impose a mandatory penalty irrespective of intent, and minor, rectifiable breaches without fraudulent intent cannot attract tax demands and penalties under this provision.
HC WM Bansi Lal v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the writ petition as a representation against recovery of alleged inadmissible training allowance and decide it fairly, staying recovery pending decision.
Maj Gen Shamsher Singh Ahlawat v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting six weeks to decide the petitioner's statutory complaint and protecting his retirement rights pending the complaint's outcome.
Chitranshu Pandey v. The State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the proclaimed offender order against the petitioner and granted anticipatory bail, emphasizing cooperation with investigation and contradictions in prosecution evidence.
Manjeet Kumar v. Food Corporation of India
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal of a candidate who delayed challenging recruitment results, holding that delay and laches disentitle 'fence-sitters' from relief even if similarly situated persons succeeded in litigation.
Tilak Raj Singh v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the review petition, holding that change of LTC destination without prior permission and without unavoidable circumstances is impermissible and allegations of delay or victimization do not warrant judicial review.
Asst Comdt Javed Ali (Retd) v. Union of India & Ors
The Delhi High Court directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's pending Post Confirmation Petition related to GSFC disciplinary proceedings within six weeks, ensuring procedural fairness despite concurrent separate disciplinary actions.
Rahul Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh medical examination by an independent Medical Board to determine if Genital Vitiligo disqualifies the petitioner from appointment under CAPFs medical guidelines.
Sunil Kumar Mehta v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that mere deformity without impairment of function does not justify medical disqualification for Assistant Sub-Inspector appointment and directed re-examination by a Medical Board.
WTC Noida Development Company Pvt. Ltd. v. Ms. Arti Khattar & Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of a Section 9 petition, holding that arbitration agreements survive contract termination and cannot be dismissed without notice and proper consideration.
Heavy Engineering Corporation Limited v. Rampur Engineering Corporation Limited
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the refusal to condone delay beyond 30 days in filing a Section 34 application against an arbitral award duly served on the appellant.
Anurag Gupta v. Arnika Gupta
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging the Family Court's ad interim maintenance order of Rs. 30,000 per month, affirming the pragmatic grant of interim relief despite appellant's unemployment claims.
Mal Chand Ajit Kumar v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Kanta Rani & Anr. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide need grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and that sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Madan Lal Bhatia v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on bona fide requirement grounds, holding that landlords need not specify the precise business and prior sales do not negate bona fide need under the Delhi Rent Control Act.
Kundan Lal v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order based on the landlord's bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specifying the precise business is not necessary and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need.
Om Prakash & Ors. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants on bona fide requirement grounds under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specifying the precise nature of business is not necessary and limiting its revisionary jurisdiction.
Om Prakash Since Deceased & Ors. v. Poonam Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order on landlord’s bona fide requirement under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that specification of business nature is not mandatory and prior sale of other properties does not negate bona fide need.
M/S VOESTALPINE SCHIENEN GMBH v. DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD. & ANR
The Delhi High Court set aside DMRC's suspension of business dealings with the petitioner for lack of prior approval from JICA as mandated by contract terms.
The Commissioner of Income Tax - International Taxation -3 v. Standard Chartered Grindlays Ltd
The Delhi High Court upheld ITAT's order allowing deductions for NRI deposit solicitation expenses and full pension fund contributions beyond prescribed limits under the Income Tax Act, 1961.