Delhi High Court

38,124 judgments

Year:

Kanchan Aggarwal v. Emirates Bank International PJSC

20 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:1131

The Delhi High Court held that no formal application under Section 65 of the Indian Evidence Act is mandatory to lead secondary evidence and dismissed the petition challenging the order permitting such evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant secondary evidence Section 65 Indian Evidence Act Section 63 Indian Evidence Act Section 482 CrPC

Sonakshi Gupta v. L.R Gupta HUF & Ors.

20 Jan 2025 · Subramonium Prasad · 2025:DHC:491

The Delhi High Court held that daughters have independent coparcenary rights under the 2005 amendment to the Hindu Succession Act and a plaint for partition cannot be rejected merely on the basis of prior oral family settlement or compromise without trial.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Hindu Succession Act 1956 Section 6 amendment 2005 coparcenary rights of daughters partition suit

Ms. Upasna Gundh & Ors. v. Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd.

20 Jan 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:476
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed a nine-year delayed appeal in a motor accident claim case, holding that the inordinate delay was not justified by sufficient cause under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause motor accident claim

Mithu Kalikotey & Ors. v. Shabbir Khan & Ors.

20 Jan 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:483

The Delhi High Court upheld a 20% deduction for contributory negligence against a deceased pedestrian who was crossing a no pedestrian zone when hit by a rashly driven bus, dismissing the appeal for enhancement of compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant contributory negligence motor accident claim loss of dependency pedestrian duty of care

Property Plus Realtors v. Union of India & Ors.

20 Jan 2025 · The Acting Chief Justice; Tushar Rao Gedela; Vibhu Bakhru · 2025:DHC:454-DB

The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under the Income Tax Act commence from the date of the first formal step such as AO's reference, not the assessment order, and dismissed the petition challenging the penalty order as barred by limitation.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 269ST Section 271DA Section 275(1)(c)

Sheela v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

20 Jan 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:423

The Delhi High Court granted regular bail to the applicant in a commercial quantity NDPS case due to prolonged trial delay and procedural lapses despite previous bail refusals under Section 37 of the NDPS Act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS Section 42 NDPS bail

Abdul Rab v. Narcotics Control Bureau

20 Jan 2025 · Amit Mahajan · 2025:DHC:422

The Delhi High Court granted bail to the applicant in a commercial quantity NDPS case, holding that uncorroborated disclosure statements and CDR evidence without recovery do not justify denial of bail, and that double jeopardy applies when accused face prosecution in two cases for the same act.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act bail disclosure statement CDR analysis

Apple Commodities Limited v. Punjab National Bank

20 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:382

The Delhi High Court set aside a bank's classification of a loan account as 'fraud' for lack of a reasoned order and directed issuance of a fresh Show Cause Notice with opportunity to reply.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant fraud classification reasoned order Show Cause Notice administrative decision

Anita v. State (NCT of Delhi)

20 Jan 2025 · Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2025:DHC:297

Anticipatory bail was denied to the accused in a multi-bank mortgage fraud case involving forged documents and serious economic offences requiring custodial interrogation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail cheating forged documents multiple mortgages

Nandan Mukherjee v. Mohd Rafiq

20 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:354

The Delhi High Court allowed the Insurance Company's review petition to correct the multiplier from 16 to 15 for compensation calculation in a motor accident claim, modifying the awarded amount accordingly.

civil appeal_allowed motor accident claim multiplier compensation calculation review petition

Directorate of Education v. Ramjas School

20 Jan 2025 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2025:DHC:327-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging school fee increase due to the appellant's failure to demonstrate sufficient cause for a 175-day delay in filing, emphasizing strict adherence to limitation rules.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act 1963 sufficient cause Letters Patent Appeal

Ajay Pal Singh Yadav v. All India Institute of Medical Sciences AIIMS

20 Jan 2025 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:317-DB

The petitioner withdrew the writ petition against AIIMS, leading to its dismissal by the Delhi High Court.

other petition_dismissed Procedural writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

Nath International Corporation v. Delhi Development Authority

20 Jan 2025 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2025:DHC:274

The Delhi High Court quashed delayed misuse charge demands by DDA and directed conversion of leasehold property to freehold, emphasizing timely SCN issuance and adherence to sanctioned plans.

property petition_allowed Significant leasehold to freehold conversion misuse charges show cause notice Delhi Development Authority

Bhavya Singh v. Reserve Bank of India & Ors.

20 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:310

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the defreezing of a wrongly frozen bank account due to mistaken identity by the Directorate of Enforcement and ordered restoration of transferred funds.

administrative petition_allowed freezing of bank account mistaken identity Directorate of Enforcement wrongful attachment

Parents Teacher Association of PP International School v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr

20 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:309

The Delhi High Court directed the DDA to reconsider its revocation of emergency gate usage permission granted to a school after hearing all parties, treating the writ petition as a representation.

administrative other Delhi Development Authority Parents Teacher Association public park emergency evacuation

Mayank Gaur and Anr v. Maharaj Malik & Ors

20 Jan 2025 · Manoj Jain · 2025:DHC:307

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition challenging the registration of a sale deed, holding that contempt is not maintainable without disobedience of court orders and substantive rights must be pursued through appropriate proceedings.

civil petition_dismissed contempt petition interim stay sale deed registration substantive rights

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Kusum Devi & Ors.

20 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:308

The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award considering the deceased's potential income as a CA student, affirmed insurer liability based on driver negligence, and rejected challenges to the quantum and multiplier.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant motor accident claim negligence potential income future prospects

Reliance General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Nand Kumar

20 Jan 2025 · Neena Bansal Krishna · 2025:DHC:306

The Delhi High Court partly allowed the insurance company's appeal by reducing compensation for loss of future income due to permanent disability but upheld negligence, medical expenses, and interest awarded in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 negligence permanent disability loss of future income

The General Manager, Northern Railways v. Harleen Kaur

20 Jan 2025 · Ravinder Dudeja, J. · 2025:DHC:273

The High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227, upholding the refusal to condone delay in filing the consumer appeal due to lack of sufficient cause and procedural delay by the government body.

consumer_protection petition_dismissed Significant condonation of delay limitation consumer protection Article 227

Rajendra Kumar v. Mamta Tanwar

20 Jan 2025 · Girish Kathpalia · 2025:DHC:287

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the trial court's refusal to grant leave to defend a money recovery suit under Order XXXVII CPC, holding the defence frivolous and affirming that civil and criminal remedies under Section 138 NI Act can be pursued concurrently.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend substantial defence frivolous defence