Delhi High Court
101,749 judgments
S. Elhance v. State Bank of India
The Delhi High Court upheld removal from service for repeated false medical reimbursement claims, ruling that courts should not interfere with disciplinary punishments unless shockingly disproportionate.
O.P. Sachdeva v. Hindustan Petroleum Corpn. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a pre-1990 disciplinary dismissal, holding that the Supreme Court's mandate to furnish inquiry reports applies prospectively only to orders passed after 20.11.1990.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The High Court of Delhi dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its contemporaneous judgment in a related case.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The High Court of Delhi dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition in CRL.M.C. 2797/2012 by referring to the judgment in a related case CRL.M.C. 2386/2012.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The High Court of Delhi dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its earlier judgment in a related case.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its earlier judgment in a related case on the same day.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 33-C(2) ID Act to determine pilots' entitlement as workmen and quantum of unpaid dues, while denying interest and rejecting management's challenge to pilots' workman status.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act to award unpaid dues to pilots classified as workmen, while denying interest on such awards.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award to pilots as workmen under Section 33-C(2) ID Act, rejecting management's jurisdictional pleas and denying interest on dues.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award to pilots as workmen entitled to unpaid salary and incentives under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, rejecting management's jurisdictional and status objections and denying interest on the awarded sums.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's jurisdiction under Section 33-C(2) of the ID Act to award unpaid dues to pilots classified as workmen, while denying interest claims and rejecting management's belated jurisdictional objections.
King Airways v. Captain Manjit Singh
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal's award of unpaid salary and benefits to pilots as workmen under Section 33-C(2) ID Act, rejecting management's jurisdictional and substantive objections, but denied interest on the awarded sums.
Tarun Gupta v. Dr. D. K. Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition against AIIMS doctors, holding that contempt jurisdiction requires clear deliberate disobedience of court orders and cannot be used to resolve disputes beyond the order's scope.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its earlier judgment in a related case.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The Delhi High Court dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its earlier judgment in a related case on the same day.
Bhupinder Singh v. Kulwant Rai Kanwal
The High Court of Delhi dismissed Bhupinder Singh's petition by referring to its earlier judgment in a related case.
Bhupinder Singh v. Tarun Puri & Anr.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition filed by Bhupinder Singh by referring to the judgment in a related case on the same day.
Bhupinder Singh v. Tarun Puri & Anr.
The High Court of Delhi dismissed the petition filed by Bhupinder Singh in CRL.M.C. 2387/2012 by referring to the judgment in a related case CRL.M.C. 2386/2012.
Bhupinder Singh v. Tarun Puri & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that directors can be criminally liable under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act only if specifically averred to be in charge of and responsible for the company's business at the time of the offence, and dismissed petitions seeking quashing of complaints against a director who had allegedly resigned but was still responsible at the relevant time.
Chintan Arvind Kapadia & Anr. v. State & Anr.
The High Court quashed the complaint against directors for dishonour of cheque, holding that mere allegations of directorship without specific averments of responsibility are insufficient to summon them under Section 141 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.