Delhi High Court

101,749 judgments

Year:

Ganesh Paswan v. NDMC

12 Feb 2013 · G. S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:7755

The High Court dismissed writ petitions as not pressed after the petitioners chose not to pursue them following a Supreme Court order.

constitutional appeal_dismissed Procedural writ petition dismissal as not pressed Supreme Court order New Delhi Municipal Council

Sh. Anand v. GNCT of Delhi

12 Feb 2013 · Reva Khetrapal · 2013:DHC:7474

The Delhi High Court held that occupants in possession of land prior to 28 October 1956 are protected from ejectment under Sections 84 and 86-A of the Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954, and directed respondents not to dispossess the petitioners.

property petition_allowed Significant Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 Section 84 Section 86-A possession prior to cut-off date

Mohd. Yasir & Ors. v. State of Delhi & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · Kailash Gambhir · 2013:DHC:6921

The Delhi High Court quashed two FIRs arising from a scuffle between neighbors after an amicable settlement, emphasizing the court's power under Section 482 CrPC to promote peace and prevent abuse of process.

criminal petition_allowed quashing of FIR amicable settlement Section 482 CrPC injury

M/s Persys Punj Lloyd Joint Venture v. Commissioner of VAT & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar

The Delhi High Court held that reassessment orders based solely on failure to deduct tax at source by a joint venture acting as a conduit are without jurisdiction, quashed the orders, and directed immediate refund of tax deducted at source with interest.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Sales Tax on Works Contracts Act, 1999 reassessment turnover escaping assessment tax deducted at source

M/S PERSYS PUNJ LLOYD JOINT VENTURE v. COMMISSIONER OF VAT & ORS

12 Feb 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:6777-DB

Reassessment orders based solely on failure to deduct tax at source without escapement of turnover are without jurisdiction, and refunds determined must be promptly issued with interest.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Sales Tax on Works Contracts Act, 1999 Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975 tax deducted at source reassessment

Ravi Mishra v. State

12 Feb 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:748

The Delhi High Court dismissed anticipatory bail for a man accused of sexually assaulting his minor niece under the POCSO Act, emphasizing the gravity of the offence and the prima facie genuineness of the prosecution.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 Section 164A CrPC sexual assault

Sunita Rani v. Govt of Haryana & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:741

The Delhi High Court dismissed a writ petition for lack of territorial jurisdiction, holding that the cause of action arose in Haryana and not Delhi despite interviews being conducted in Delhi.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction cause of action Article 226 writ petition

Vijay Kumar Sekhri and Others v. Tinna Overseas Ltd. and Others

12 Feb 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2013:DHC:713

The Delhi High Court dismissed appeals against a Company Law Board order on remuneration disputes between family shareholders, holding that an unchallenged subsequent clarification order settled all claims between the parties.

corporate appeal_dismissed Companies Act, 1956 Company Law Board family settlement consent order

Kasif & Anr v. State

12 Feb 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:712

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to order a joint trial of co-accused where one trial was at an advanced stage and the other commenced after a significant delay, emphasizing the discretionary nature of Section 223 CrPC.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 223 CrPC joint trial separate trial kidnapping

M/S. MITTAL EXTRUSION WORKS PRIVATE LTD. v. M/S. BIOGENETIC DRUGS PVT. LTD. & ORS.

12 Feb 2013 · Manmohan · 2013:DHC:723

The Delhi High Court held that a clear and accepted forum selection clause in invoices confers exclusive jurisdiction on Ghaziabad courts, ousting Delhi's jurisdiction in a commercial contract dispute.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant territorial jurisdiction forum selection clause ouster clause contract acceptance

Rajesh @ Dai v. State

12 Feb 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Siddharth Mridul · 2013:DHC:742-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and lack of conclusive evidence, emphasizing the necessity of proof beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 302 IPC murder eyewitness testimony reasonable doubt

Ajay Mangla v. Surinder Kumar & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · A.K. Pathak · 2013:DHC:743

The suit for specific performance became infructuous upon sale of the property to a third party through a registered sale deed executed by the plaintiff as attorney, and substitution of the purchaser as plaintiff was not permissible.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance sale deed Order 22 Rule 10 CPC possession

Rajiv Kapoor v. M/S Novell Constructions

12 Feb 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:711

The Delhi High Court disposed of a Section 9 petition under the Arbitration Act by consent, directing possession delivery and completion of pending works in a construction dispute.

civil other Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 9 Construction agreement Possession

Darshan Singh Returning Officer v. Yogender & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:749

The Delhi High Court quashed departmental proceedings against election officials, holding that genuine mistakes without malafides do not warrant disciplinary action.

administrative petition_allowed Significant election duty departmental proceedings government servants Section 340 CrPC

P.C. Sen v. Union of India & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · The Chief Justice; V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:747-DB

The Delhi High Court held that an IAS officer appointed on deputation as Managing Director of Indian Airlines was not entitled to free air passages on demitting office in the absence of a specific provision in his appointment terms or applicable service rules.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant deputation Indian Administrative Service free air passages terms and conditions of appointment

M/s Persys Punj Lloyd Joint Venture v. Commissioner of VAT & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2013:DHC:714-DB

The Delhi High Court held that failure to deduct TDS by a joint venture acting as a conduit does not amount to turnover escaping assessment, quashed reassessment orders, and directed immediate refund of tax deducted at source.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Sales Tax on Works Contracts Act, 1999 reassessment tax deducted at source turnover escaping assessment

Misrilall Mines Pvt Ltd and Anr v. MMTC Ltd and Ors

12 Feb 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:708-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld MMTC's authority to impose reasonable technical bid conditions in the global e-tender for chrome ore exports, dismissing the petitioners' challenge as lacking merit and locus standi.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant judicial review tender conditions canalizing agency Foreign Trade (Development & Regulation) Act, 1992

Naresh Kumar Gupta v. M.C.D. and Anr.

12 Feb 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:702-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award rejecting the contractor's delayed payment claims as barred by limitation under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant limitation arbitration final bill contractual claims

General Manager, Northern Railways v. Brij Mohan & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:703-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside Tribunal orders invalidating promotions of junior employees, holding that seniority can be considered in departmental promotions and that uncommunicated adverse service assessments without benchmark gradings do not violate employee rights.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority Annual Confidential Report ACR grading

General Manager, Northern Railways v. Brij Mohan & Ors.

12 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:710-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside Tribunal orders invalidating promotions, holding that seniority weightage was permissible and non-communication of 'average' service assessment did not vitiate the selection process.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant promotion seniority Annual Confidential Report ACR grading