Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

Chief Electoral Officer and Ors. v. Rakesh Chaudhary

19 Nov 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:9182-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing release of pensionary benefits and leave encashment to a retired government servant, holding that pension cannot be withheld without cognizance by the criminal court and leave encashment cannot be withheld without a specific decision by the competent authority.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant taking cognizance pension withholding leave encashment Central Civil Services Pension Rules

D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8938

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate contract disputes after the respondents failed to appoint an arbitrator despite valid requests.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8940

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 after the petitioner exhausted the contractual dispute resolution mechanism and the respondents failed to respond to arbitration appointment requests.

civil petition_allowed Significant arbitration clause Section 11(6) Arbitration and Conciliation Act appointment of arbitrator multi-tier dispute resolution

TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. M/S NELKO BATTERY AND ELECTRONICS & ANR.

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8936
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a loan agreement containing a valid arbitration clause, with parties consenting to arbitration.

civil petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Sole Arbitrator appointment Arbitration clause Loan-cum-Guarantee agreement

M/S CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. SURBHI CHAWLA PROPRIETOR OF M/S SURBHI MOTORS

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8941
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a credit facility agreement, despite non-appearance of respondents.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) sole arbitrator appointment arbitration clause

CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. HARDEEP SINGH & ANR

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8942

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(5) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, following a valid arbitration clause and sufficient service of notice despite respondents' non-appearance.

arbitration appeal_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(5) Appointment of sole arbitrator Credit Facility Agreement

D.C. Engineers v. Irrigation and Flood Control Department and Another

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8939

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a construction contract after the respondents failed to act on the petitioner’s arbitration request.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause

M. M. Dhonchak v. Union of India

19 Nov 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2024:DHC:8924-DB

The High Court dismissed the appeal as withdrawn on the appellant's request for leave to withdraw the appeal.

other appeal_dismissed Procedural appeal withdrawal leave to withdraw dismissal of appeal procedural order

Mr. Puneet Jain; Ms. Kiffi Aggarwal; Mr. Vijay Kumar Dubey v. M/S RKMT BUILDCON PVT LTD

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9013
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by the mandatory three-month limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, refusing to condone delay beyond that period.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 Limitation period Condonation of delay

CARS 24 FINANCIAL SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED v. JATIN WALIA & ANR

19 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8937

Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from a credit facility agreement due to respondents' default and non-response.

arbitration petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 3 Section 12

Iqbal Singh v. State

19 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:9081

Delhi High Court upheld conviction for possession of fake currency under Section 489C IPC but modified sentence to the period already served considering appellant's personal circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed fake currency Section 489C IPC decoy customer recovery of counterfeit notes

KALAMKARI LIFESTYLE TECH PVT LTD v. MSME FACILIATION COUNCIL, MUMBAI

19 Nov 2024 · MANMOHAN, CJ; TUSHAR RAO GEDELA, J · 2024:DHC:9047-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the constitutional validity of Section 18(4) of the MSMED Act, affirming exclusive jurisdiction at the supplier’s location and dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Section 18(4) MSMED Act jurisdiction supplier’s location constitutional validity

ADM CORPORATION v. REDINGTON INDIA LTD & ANR.

19 Nov 2024 · Manmeet Pritam Singh Arora · 2024:DHC:9040

The Delhi High Court held that Defendant No. 2 is a necessary and proper party to the suit for recovery of commission and injunctions despite no direct contract, dismissing its application for deletion from the suit.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order I Rule 10 CPC necessary party proper party Overriding Commission

M/S SAGAR RATNA RESTAURANTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. HILL VIEW HOTEL AND RESTAURANT

19 Nov 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:8985-DB

The Delhi High Court held that suits seeking urgent interim relief under the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 are exempt from mandatory pre-institution mediation under Section 12A, and remanded the suit for merits consideration.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Commercial Courts Act, 2015 Section 12A pre-institution mediation urgent interim relief

M/S Indra Singh and Sons Pvt. Ltd. v. New Delhi Municipal Council

19 Nov 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:9008
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that property tax assessments under the ultra vires 2009 NDMC Bye-laws using the Unit Area Method are invalid and set aside the impugned tax demand, directing reassessment consistent with judicial rulings.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Unit Area Method NDMC Bye-laws 2009 Ultra vires Property tax assessment

Rajiv Kumar v. Jawahar Lal Vohra

19 Nov 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee · 2024:DHC:8974-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal and applications for extension of time after he failed to comply with an undertaking to vacate commercial premises and pay arrears, recalling its earlier order and allowing execution proceedings.

civil appeal_dismissed mesne profits possession commercial tenancy undertaking to court

Shri Surinder Singh Yadav v. Oriental Insurance Company Limited

19 Nov 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8907
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition alleging non-compliance with promotion directions, holding that retrospective promotions and seniority adjustments must comply with eligibility and procedural rules.

civil petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court promotion notional promotion seniority

Ocean Plastics & Fibers (P) Limited v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.

19 Nov 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8897

The Delhi High Court held that a lessee whose lease has been determined and possession taken by DDA is not entitled to restoration under a subsequent scheme intended only for lessees remaining in possession.

property petition_dismissed Significant perpetual lease lease determination eviction Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971

M/S Gayatri Webtech Pvt. Ltd. v. Delhi Development Authority

19 Nov 2024 · Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:8895

The Delhi High Court quashed a three-year debarment of a contractor from tenders for terminating a plumber without prior permission, holding that debarment requires a conviction under specified laws and cannot be imposed arbitrarily.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Debarment Tender Contract termination Disaster Management Act

Tiger 4 India Ltd v. Ashok Kumar Rajak

19 Nov 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:8931

The Delhi High Court upheld the Competent Authority's order awarding earned wages to a security guard where the employer failed to contest the claim despite summons and appearance.

labor appeal_dismissed earned wages Delhi Shops and Establishments Act, 1954 ex-parte order claim petition