Delhi High Court

101,979 judgments

Year:

Godrej Consumer Products Limited v. Dabur India Limited

04 Mar 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:1172-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of Rs. 1,00,000 costs as a condition precedent for filing a delayed written statement under Order 8 Rule 1 CPC, affirming the discretionary power of courts to impose substantial costs for procedural delays under Section 35B CPC.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order 8 Rule 1 CPC Section 35B CPC costs extension of time

Raja Ram v. Union of India

04 Mar 2013 · S. RAVINDRA BHAT; SUDERSHAN KUMAR MISRA · 2013:DHC:1174-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court set aside compulsory retirement of CISF constable for extortion due to lack of evidence and resiling complainant, emphasizing judicial review of disciplinary findings.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry compulsory retirement extortion allegation resiling witness

Devinder Kumar Narula v. Virender Kumar

04 Mar 2013 · Hima Kohli · 2013:DHC:1175

The Court dismissed the plaintiff's suit for injunction due to suppression of material facts regarding an Exchange Agreement, allowed withdrawal subject to costs, and directed payment of deficient court fees.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant permanent injunction temporary injunction Order XXXIX CPC suppression of material facts

O.N. Kaul v. State

04 Mar 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:1157

The Delhi High Court upheld framing of charges under Section 304-A IPC against an airline duty manager for criminal negligence in failing to provide medical assistance to an off-loaded passenger, emphasizing that strong suspicion suffices at the charge framing stage.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant criminal negligence Section 304-A IPC duty of care framing of charge

Kanwaljeet Kaur Bedi v. Aditya Birla Retail Ltd. & Anr.

04 Mar 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2013:DHC:1154
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period for challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 starts only upon delivery of the signed award by the arbitrator to the party, and condoned delay where such delivery was not made.

civil petition_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 31(5) Section 34 Arbitral award

P.S. Rawal and Ors. v. Union of India and Ors.

04 Mar 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2013:DHC:1161-DB

The Delhi High Court held that RPF officers eligible under the 2010 Ministry of Railways resolution must be considered for promotion to the post of Additional Director General, prohibiting filling the post by deputation from outside services.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Railway Protection Force Additional Director General Promotion Higher Administrative Grade

Surinder Kaur v. State & Ors.

04 Mar 2013 · Sanjiv Khanna; Siddharth Mridul · 2013:DHC:1168-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 304 Part-I and Section 326 IPC for death caused in a sudden quarrel, clarified the application of common intention, and apportioned compensation between the wife and mother of the deceased.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 304 Part-I IPC Section 302 IPC common intention sudden quarrel

Kuldeep Singh v. State

04 Mar 2013 · G. P. Mittal · 2013:DHC:1164

The Delhi High Court transferred the investigation of a cheating and misappropriation case from local police to the Economic Offences Wing, declining CBI involvement but emphasizing the need for fair and supervised inquiry under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC transfer of investigation CBI investigation fair investigation

Tarun Chadha v. Karishma

04 Mar 2013 · P. K. Bhasin · 2013:DHC:1159

The Delhi High Court upheld the maintenance order under the Domestic Violence Act but dismissed the wife's claim for rent allowance, refusing to interfere with the appellate court's order under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

family appeal_dismissed Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 maintenance rent payment Section 12

MS Mamta v. University of Delhi and Anr

04 Mar 2013 · G. S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:1158

The Delhi High Court allowed a writ petition directing the University of Delhi to admit a meritorious candidate under the General category after she was denied admission under the OBC category due to non-inclusion in the Central List, emphasizing equitable treatment and merit.

administrative appeal_allowed B.Ed. admission OBC category General category Central List

Babloo v. State

04 Mar 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1160

The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction under the NDPS Act but reduced the sentence to the statutory minimum and modified default sentences for fines considering the appellant's incarceration period and circumstances.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant NDPS Act Section 20 NDPS Section 21 NDPS sentence modification

Amarjeet Singh @ Babloo v. State

04 Mar 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1155

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 307 IPC and Arms Act due to material contradictions in police evidence and lack of independent corroboration.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 27 Arms Act police witness testimony independent corroboration

Ram Sunder v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)

04 Mar 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1156
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the rape conviction based on credible prosecutrix testimony despite delay in FIR, modifying the sentence considering mitigating factors.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape prosecutrix testimony delay in FIR corroboration

DTC v. Suresh Kumar

04 Mar 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1163-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a disciplinary authority must independently address all contentions not dealt with by the Inquiry Officer before imposing penalty, and upheld the Tribunal's order remanding the matter for reconsideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disciplinary authority Inquiry Officer report delinquent employee contentions

Sallamuddin v. State

04 Mar 2013 · Mukta Gupta · 2013:DHC:1162

The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction under Section 354 IPC due to contradictions in the prosecutrix's statements and acquittal under more serious charges, acquitting the appellant.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 354 IPC contradictions in prosecutrix statement FIR registration acquittal under Sections 376/506 IPC

P.K. Sharma v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

04 Mar 2013 · THE CHIEF JUSTICE; V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1153-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that termination of an ad hoc employee after 240 days of continuous service without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal retrenchment, entitling the employee to compensation instead of reinstatement.

labor appeal_allowed Significant ad hoc appointment retrenchment Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act continuous service 240 days

T4/S IANS PVT LTD v. IvI/S MOGAE DIGITAL PVT LTD

01 Mar 2013 · I{ANMOHAN SINGH · 2013:DHC:8039

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a contract containing an arbitration clause.

civil petition_allowed Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause sole arbitrator

Suraj Bhan v. Union of India & Anr.

01 Mar 2013 · Reva Khetrapal · 2013:DHC:7907

The Delhi High Court condoned an 836-day delay in filing an appeal and granted enhanced compensation to the appellant based on a prior binding judgment.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay enhanced compensation appeal affidavit

Gopalalrishnan and Anr v. North Delhi Municipal Corporation

01 Mar 2013 · G.S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:7173

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte municipal property tax assessment and bank account attachment against guest houses classified as three-star hotels, directing a fresh hearing with opportunity to present evidence.

administrative appeal_allowed property tax guest houses municipal corporation classification

Laxmi Narain Sharma v. The Govt. of the National Capital Territory of Delhi

01 Mar 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Indermeet Kaur · 2013:DHC:7152

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions challenging a 1959 land acquisition notification after 36 years, holding that delay and acceptance of compensation bar reopening settled acquisition proceedings.

property petition_dismissed Land Acquisition Act 1894 Section 4 notification Article 300A Constitution delay in challenging acquisition