Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Sarabjeet Singh v. Anup Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the plaintiff was not continuously ready and willing to perform the Agreements to Sell and thus not entitled to specific performance.
Harmaninder Kaur v. Delhi Development Authority & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking allotment of a flat due to automatic cancellation for non-payment and long delay, but directed refund of the deposited amount.
MS Lion Security Guards Services; MS Aakanksha Enterprises; MS Rekart Innovations Pvt Ltd v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of a joint venture's technical bid for non-compliance with essential tender conditions relating to Power of Attorney execution and inconsistent designation of lead member.
Navigators Logistics Ltd v. Kashif Qureshi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, holding that the plaint disclosed a cause of action and that post-employment non-compete clauses are void under Section 27 of the Contract Act.
Pawan Chaudhry & Anr. v. Nimesh Jain & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a suit involving allegations of forgery cannot be decreed under Order VIII Rule 10 CPC merely due to defendants' failure to file written statements without evidence proving the disputed facts.
M/S M.H. ONE TV NETWORK PVT. LTD. v. M/S MH 7 NEWS AND ANR.
The Delhi High Court cancelled the respondent's trademark registration for 'MH7' due to deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior registered trademark 'MH1/MH ONE', affirming protection against infringement and unfair competition.
Staff Selection Commission & Ors. v. Abhishek
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order directing a re-medical examination by a dermatologist to assess the respondent's fitness for Delhi Police Constable recruitment in light of tattoo restrictions, dismissing the petition challenging it.
Apollo Supply Chain Pvt. Ltd v. M/S Jalan Transolutions (India) Ltd
The Delhi High Court held that at the Section 11 stage, only the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement is to be examined and appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's claim of accord and satisfaction.
VCARE TECHNOLOGIES PVT LTD v. MR NIKHIL RAI
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 upon confirming the existence of a valid arbitration agreement, leaving all substantive disputes to arbitration.
M/S SOMA NEW TOWNS PVT LTD v. M/S VIKAS BUILDMART PRIVATE LIMITED AND ORS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator to adjudicate disputes arising from a share purchase agreement, directing arbitration as per the contract and Arbitration Act provisions.
SNAP ON TOOLS PRIVATE LIMITED v. MS METRICS APPLICATIONS
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a reseller agreement where parties failed to agree on arbitrator appointment.
Rakesh Kumar v. Union of India through General Manager Northern Railways and Anr.
The Delhi High Court appointed an independent sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to adjudicate disputes arising from termination of a railway parcel leasing contract, following the Supreme Court's ruling invalidating the contract's arbitration appointment procedure.
Ashish Kochar v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application in a murder case, holding that the serious nature of the offence and likelihood of evidence tampering outweigh the petitioner’s liberty interests.
Malkhan Singh & Ors. v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence of appellants to the period already undergone due to prolonged trial and their personal circumstances.
Prakash Pipes Limited v. Jai Ambay Industries and Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent's trademark 'KIRANPARKASH' for fraudulent registration and deceptive similarity with the petitioner's prior mark 'PRAKASH'.
Dhan Prakash Gupta v. Income Tax Department
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the jurisdiction and merits of reassessment notices issued under Section 148A of the Income Tax Act, holding that the Assessing Officer validly initiated proceedings based on information suggesting income escaping assessment.
Rongali Naidu v. Indian Coast Guard
The Delhi High Court allowed writ petitions of candidates wrongly rejected in Indian Coast Guard recruitment due to minor inadvertent discrepancies, directing their reinstatement subject to verification and completion of formalities.
National Highways Authority of India v. Oriental Pathways (Agra) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed NHAI's challenge to an arbitral award denying recovery of damages, holding that the award was not patently illegal or perverse and that courts cannot reappreciate evidence under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
Rahul Kesarwani v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a petition seeking initiation of perjury proceedings under Section 340 CrPC, holding that mere discrepancies in evidence without deliberate obstruction of justice do not warrant such action.
Kanohar Electricals Limited v. Delhi Transco Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from delay and liquidated damages in a transformer supply contract.