Delhi High Court

98,981 judgments

Year:

Vinod Kumar v. Parimal Rai, Chairman NDMC

22 Apr 2013 · G. S. Sistani · 2013:DHC:2017

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against NDMC, holding that no wilful disobedience of court orders was established as the respondents passed a detailed reasoned order complying with court directions.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 contempt jurisdiction wilful disobedience PCO allotment

Harjinder Kumar and Nar v. DDA and Anr

22 Apr 2013 · V.K. Jain · 2013:DHC:1982

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging DDA's sealing and demolition order, directing the petitioners to exhaust their statutory appeal remedy before the Appellate Tribunal under the Delhi Development Act.

administrative petition_dismissed Delhi Development Act Section 31A Section 31C writ petition

Sh. Chet Ram Gupta v. Smt. Motia Devi Lamba

22 Apr 2013 · P.K. Bhasin · 2013:DHC:1984

The Delhi High Court dismissed the application for impleadment of a third party purchaser in a suit for specific performance, holding that impleadment requires challenging the validity of the transaction creating third-party interest.

civil petition_dismissed specific performance impleadment Order I Rule 10 CPC injunction

Kapil Chaudhary & Ors. v. State & Anr.

22 Apr 2013 · Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:7552

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 406, 498A, and 34 IPC based on an amicable settlement between the parties, affirming the High Court's inherent power to quash criminal proceedings in matrimonial disputes under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR Section 498A IPC inherent jurisdiction Section 482 CrPC

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. M/S J.K. Petrochemicals and Anr.

22 Apr 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2013:DHC:7579-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by United India Insurance Co. Ltd. for non-maintainability due to availability of an alternative statutory remedy of appeal under Section 20 of the Recovery of Debts Due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

civil appeal_dismissed writ petition alternative remedy Section 20 Recovery of Debts Due to Banks & Financial Institutions Act, 1993

Santosh Kumar Arya v. The Chief Secretary Govt.

22 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for re-employment under Rule 110 of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973, holding that timely application is mandatory and re-employment is not an automatic right.

administrative appeal_dismissed re-employment Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 Rule 110 timely application

M/S OSWAL GREENTECH LTD. & ANR. v. LALIT KUMAR BAGLA

22 Apr 2013 · Sanjay Kishan Kaul; Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2013:DHC:7977-DB

The Delhi High Court held that interest on a decree amount continues to run until the decree holder obtains unconditional possession of the amount, and conditional deposits pursuant to stay orders do not stop interest from accruing.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interest on decree conditional deposit stay of execution payment under decree

Rajiv Kumar v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi

22 Apr 2013 · S. P. Garg · 2013:DHC:1992

The High Court of Delhi disposed of the criminal appeal of Rajiv Kumar by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related appeal on the same day.

criminal other appeal conviction criminal appeal High Court of Delhi

Davinderjit Singh and Anr v. School Management of Guru Harkrishan Public School and Ors

22 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:7242

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioners to withdraw their writ petitions against the school management and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

constitutional petition_dismissed writ petition withdrawal dismissal High Court of Delhi

Jaiprakash & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

22 Apr 2013 · Sunil Gaur · 2013:DHC:8079

The Delhi High Court quashed criminal proceedings arising from a family dispute settled amicably by a Memorandum of Understanding, holding that continuation would be an abuse of process and contrary to justice.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant quashing of FIR family dispute amicable settlement Memorandum of Understanding

Pritam Ashok Sadaphule v. Hima Chugh

22 Apr 2013 · Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:1985
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a foreign divorce decree granted on grounds not recognized under the Hindu Marriage Act and without effective submission to foreign jurisdiction is not enforceable in India.

family petition_dismissed Significant foreign divorce decree recognition of foreign judgments Section 13 CPC Hindu Marriage Act

Commissioner of Central Excise v. M/S Sigma Corporation India Pvt Ltd

22 Apr 2013 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Veena Birbal · 2013:DHC:1978-DB

The Delhi High Court held that Merchant Overtime Tax charges are not leviable for supervision by Customs Officers within their jurisdictional range and during normal working hours, dismissing the appeal of the Commissioner of Central Excise.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Merchant Overtime Tax Central Excise Officer Customs Officer Customs Act 1962

Sh. Chander Prakash v. Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

22 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:2012

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary findings of gross negligence against a retired RBI officer, dismissed his writ petition, but granted interest on delayed pension payments pending final departmental orders.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant departmental enquiry gross negligence pension withholding natural justice

Delhi Development Authority v. Puran Lal

22 Apr 2013 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2013:DHC:2019-DB

The Delhi High Court held that cancellation of a rehabilitation plot allotment solely based on a common ration card was unsustainable where spot verifications confirmed separate residence and the allottee had settled equities.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority Jhuggi dwellers Alternative plot allotment Ration card

GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI v. S.C.GUPTA

22 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:1991-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the Tribunal's orders and remanded disciplinary proceedings against engineering officers for fresh adjudication, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness, disclosure of CVC advice, and consideration of all substantive pleas including evidence of sub-standard materials and design defects.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant disciplinary inquiry natural justice Central Vigilance Commission advice CCS (CCA) Rules 1965

Union of India & Ors. v. Jagdish Prasad

22 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1979-DB

The Delhi High Court held that only the appointing authority can impose major penalties like compulsory retirement under Railway Servants Rules, invalidating the penalty imposed by a non-appointing authority and remanding the matter for corrective action.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Railway Servants (Discipline & Appeal) Rules, 1968 appointing authority compulsory retirement disciplinary proceedings

Raj Kumar Jha v. Union of India

22 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2013:DHC:1977-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that delay by the government in regularizing promotions cannot prejudice officers’ induction into IPS, directed amendment of seniority rules to align pay and seniority, and upheld induction of officers despite delayed willingness submission.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Indian Police Service DANIPS promotion seniority

The Management of DTC v. Om Prakash

22 Apr 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; V. Kameswar Rao · 2013:DHC:2013-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a belated claim for pension arrears does not entitle the pensioner to interest on arrears, but excess interest wrongly deducted on Provident Fund adjustments must be refunded.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant pension arrears interest on arrears qualifying service voluntary retirement scheme

Gurudutta Sharma and Anr. v. Central Civil Services Board

19 Apr 2013 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2013:DHC:7468

The Delhi High Court dismissed writ petitions seeking creation of permanent posts for perennial work, directing petitioners to seek relief under the Supreme Court’s Umadevi judgment.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant regularization creation of posts perennial work writ petition

Army Public School & Anr. v. Sh. Narendra Singh Nain and Anr.

18 Apr 2013 · Chief Justice; Jayant Nath, J. · 2013:DHC:8507-DB

The Delhi High Court directed interim reinstatement with back wages deposited in court pending final disposal of a writ petition challenging termination of school employees working on probation.

labor appeal_allowed Significant interim reinstatement termination on probation back wages Delhi School Tribunal