Full Text
Translation output
\S
3to6
{< IN THE HIGH COURT OF
+ w.P.(c) 3s2/1996
GURUDUTTA SHARMA AND ANR.
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Advocate.
3to6
{< IN THE HIGH COURT OF
+ w.P.(c) 3s2/1996
GURUDUTTA SHARMA AND ANR.
DELHI AT NEW DELHI..... Petitioners
Through: Mr. R.K. Kapoor, Advocate.
VERSUS
CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate.
W.P.(C) Ig6gllgg6and C.M. No.3582/1 996
SHRI PREM SINGH ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr..R.K.Kapoor,Advocate.
CENTRAL CIVL SERVICES BOARD ..... Respondent
+ W.P.(C) 2s8l/r996 and C.M. No.4540/1996
SHRI OM PRAKASH ..... petitioner
Through: Mr. Ruchir Mishra, Advocate.
W.P.(C) Ig6gllgg6and C.M. No.3582/1 996
SHRI PREM SINGH ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr..R.K.Kapoor,Advocate.
CENTRAL CIVL SERVICES BOARD ..... Respondent
+ W.P.(C) 2s8l/r996 and C.M. No.4540/1996
SHRI OM PRAKASH ..... petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD
Through: Mr. l[/.P.(C) Nos.352/1996 & conn. matters ..... Respondent
Ruchir Mishra, Advocate. page I of2
2013:DHC:7468
\1
+ W.P.(C) 2982/2011 and C.M. No.6342/2011
HANIF KHAN ..... petitioner
Through: Mr. l[/.P.(C) Nos.352/1996 & conn. matters ..... Respondent
Ruchir Mishra, Advocate. page I of2
2013:DHC:7468
\1
+ W.P.(C) 2982/2011 and C.M. No.6342/2011
HANIF KHAN ..... petitioner
VERSUS
CENTRAL CIVIL SERVICES BOARD ..... Respondent
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VALMIKI J. MEHTA
% 18.04.2013
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the reliefs in the present cases may possibly be covered by the Constitution Bench
% 18.04.2013
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the reliefs in the present cases may possibly be covered by the Constitution Bench
ORDER
of the Supreme court in the case of secretary, state of Karnataka & ors
Vs' Umadevi & Ors. 2006 (4) SCC 1 and therefore really the petitioners have to seek and are seeking creation of posts as the work is perennial in nafure.
Writ petitions and applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations. rA ^
V ClLu^au,ttt-!-u*-
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
APRIL 19, 2013
Ne
W.P.(C) Nos.352/1996 & conn. matters
2013:DHC:7468
Vs' Umadevi & Ors. 2006 (4) SCC 1 and therefore really the petitioners have to seek and are seeking creation of posts as the work is perennial in nafure.
Writ petitions and applications are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid observations. rA ^
V ClLu^au,ttt-!-u*-
VALMIKI J. MEHTA, J
APRIL 19, 2013
Ne
W.P.(C) Nos.352/1996 & conn. matters
2013:DHC:7468