Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
Property Plus Realtors v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271DA of the Income Tax Act must be initiated within the prescribed limitation period from the date of receipt of reference, setting aside a penalty order passed beyond that period.
Property Plus Realtors v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that penalty proceedings under Section 271DA of the Income Tax Act must be initiated within limitation from the date of receipt of reference, and delayed penalty orders beyond this period are barred.
Rahul v. United India Insurance Co Ltd & Ors
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by increasing disability assessment, applying future prospects, and awarding higher damages for pain and suffering, while upholding income assessment based on minimum wages of claimant's residence.
Hari Om Rai v. Directorate of Enforcement
The Delhi High Court granted bail to the petitioner in a money laundering case, holding that prolonged incarceration without speedy trial violates constitutional rights despite stringent statutory bail conditions under the PMLA.
Matrix Cellular International Services Limited v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash the FIR against Matrix Cellular for allegedly selling sub-standard oxygen concentrators during the COVID-19 pandemic, holding that investigation must continue before adjudicating the merits.
M/S TDI Infrastructure Ltd v. Vikram Barwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the NCDRC's dismissal of petitioners' applications for extension of time to file written statements, holding that statutory timelines under the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 are rigid and service with some dim annexures does not vitiate the limitation period.
Shubham Saxena v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) & Anr
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner's bail application, holding that quashing of FIR against co-accused does not constitute a change in circumstances and delay in trial is not a ground for bail given the serious charges and flight risk.
The Institute of Chartered Accountants of India v. CA Subhajit Sahoo
The Delhi High Court upheld the finding of gross negligence against a Chartered Accountant for issuing unverified utilisation certificates, affirming the disciplinary removal from the ICAI register for one year under the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949.
VIVO MOBILE INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED v. CUSTOMS AUTHORITY FOR ADVANCE RULINGS
The Delhi High Court upheld the classification of MEMS Microphones under Customs Tariff Heading 8518 10 00 as microphones, rejecting the appellant's claim to classify them as Electronic Integrated Circuits under Heading 8542.
Tirupati Narashima Murari v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the Election Commission has no power to deregister a political party for alleged violation of secularism once registered under Section 29A of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, dismissing the petition challenging AIMIM's registration.
Dr. R.N. Gupta Technical Educational Society v. M/s Intec Capital Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award on a loan dispute, upholding the award's factual findings and interest rate while correcting a minor arithmetical error.
Gillanders Arbuthnot and Co. Limited v. Steel Authority of India Limited
The Delhi High Court restored an arbitral award holding SAIL's claims barred by limitation, ruling that post-termination contractual clauses do not extend limitation and arbitration claims must be filed within the prescribed period.
Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1 v. M/S Agroha Fincap Ltd.
The High Court held that reassessment under Section 147/148 is valid in absence of jurisdictional satisfaction under Section 153C, allowing the Revenue's appeal and restoring the matter to ITAT.
Daisy Distributors Pvt. Ltd. v. The Income Tax Officer Ward 7(1) New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that in absence of material handed over from a searched person, the Assessing Officer can validly reopen assessments under Section 148 and is not restricted to proceedings under Section 153C.
Sukhvinder Kumar Bhardwaj v. Smt Vinita
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's suo motu preliminary decree for recovery of possession in a residential tenancy dispute, rejecting the appellant's jurisdictional and procedural objections.
Mohd Amin Deceased through LRs v. Mohd Iqbal Deceased through LRs
The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award directing reversion of disputed land and costs, applying Section 14 of the Limitation Act to exclude time spent in execution proceedings, but set aside compensation for demolished constructions due to lack of evidence.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sh. Satya Pal Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld escalation claims under contract wage revision clauses but set aside damages for loss of profit due to delay for lack of evidence, limiting judicial interference in arbitral awards.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax -7, Delhi v. Naveen Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court held that Section 153C of the Income Tax Act applies only if its conditions are met and does not bar reassessment under Section 147 where those conditions are not satisfied.
Vineet Taneja v. Ritu Taneja
The Delhi High Court held that court-appointed counsellors in guardianship cases are not witnesses subject to cross-examination, but parties may cross-examine opposing party witnesses, emphasizing the child's welfare as paramount.
Aktivortho Private Limited v. Dilbagh Singh Sachdeva
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal challenging an arbitral award upholding rent payment obligations under a commercial lease with a lock-in period, emphasizing limited judicial interference in arbitration awards.