Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

F.HOFFMANN-LA ROCHE LTD & ANR v. CIPLA LTD

07 Sep 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:9677-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld Roche's patent validity but held Cipla's polymorph B product does not infringe, clarifying inventive step and Section 3(d) standards in pharmaceutical patents.

intellectual_property appeal_allowed Significant Inventive step Section 3(d) Patent infringement Polymorphs

Amit Kumar v. Union of India and Ors

30 Aug 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9041-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 6

The Delhi High Court allowed the writ petition and directed appointment of the petitioner after forensic examination confirmed his thumb impressions matched, overruling earlier rejection based on handwriting mismatch.

administrative petition_allowed Significant forensic expert report handwriting mismatch thumb impression natural justice

Himani Malhotra v. Indraprastha College for Women and Anr

21 Aug 2012 · Anu Malhotra · 2017:DHC:3762

The Delhi High Court held that a suspended teacher cannot be arbitrarily denied permission to attend UGC Orientation and Refresher courses and directed the college to issue the necessary No Objection Certificate and attest application forms.

administrative petition_allowed Significant suspension No Objection Certificate Orientation Programme Refresher Course

Satinder Mahendru v. New Delhi Municipal Council

17 Aug 2012 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:293

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioner’s claim for alternate premises, holding that an unauthorized occupant without a valid license cannot claim parity with license holders evicted for public purposes under Article 14.

administrative petition_dismissed unauthorized occupant alternate accommodation Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971 Article 14

Union of India v. Anand Mohan Sharan

26 Jul 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Sudhir Kumar Jain · 2024:DHC:7900-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 22

The Delhi High Court held that the Disciplinary Authority's order remitting a disciplinary matter for fresh inquiry without proper reasons and in violation of procedural rules was unsustainable and set aside the order.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1969 Disciplinary Authority Inquiry Officer Central Vigilance Commission

Hindustan Zinc Ltd v. Durha Construction Pvt Ltd

17 Jul 2012 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2021:DHC:697

The Delhi High Court upheld striking off the appellant's defence for wilful non-compliance with a discovery order under Order 11 Rule 12 CPC, emphasizing the obligation to produce relevant documents and the consequences of contumacious conduct.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant discovery order Order 11 Rule 12 CPC Order 11 Rule 21 CPC striking off defence

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6269-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of his mentally disabled sister-in-law, holding that credible eyewitness testimony and circumstances established the offence despite absence of medical injuries.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical evidence mental disability credibility of witness

Mr.M.L.Yadav, Advocate v. STATE .....

06 Jul 2012 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP NANDRAJOG; HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE M... · 2014:DHC:6268-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Janardhan Gupta for attempted rape of a mentally disabled minor, affirming that credible witness testimony and circumstantial evidence suffice to prove the offence despite absence of physical injuries or semen.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant attempted rape medical examination mental disability forensic evidence

Cpl Gaurav Badhwar v. Union of India & Ors.

18 May 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:1454-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court held that denial of discharge on grounds of trade criticality is arbitrary when objective evidence shows the trade is redundant and personnel are assigned non-technical duties, directing the Air Force to grant discharge to Cpl. Gaurav Badhwar.

service_law petition_allowed Significant criticality of trade discharge from armed forces instrument fitter trade modernization of armed forces

S. L. Saini v. Gyanender Bharti & Ors.

17 May 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:2261

The Delhi High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the Delhi Jal Board and GNCTD, holding that no wilful disobedience occurred as the land acquisition process under the 2013 LA Act is underway in accordance with law.

administrative petition_dismissed contempt of court land acquisition Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 wilful disobedience

Deepak Verma v. Union of India & Ors.

01 May 2012 · Sanjiv Khanna; Navin Chawla · 2017:DHC:6388-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 11

The Delhi High Court upheld the rejection of an Officer Cadet's reinstatement request as time barred and affirmed that a resignation accepted by the competent military authority is final and cannot be withdrawn.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant resignation reinstatement Officers Training Academy military training

Shail Attrey v. Govt of India and Ors.

27 Apr 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao; Anoop Kumar Mendiratta · 2023:DHC:891-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order fixing pay of a retired Army officer absorbed in DRDO, holding that personal pay can substitute rank pay within the civilian pay scale to avoid pecuniary loss.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant pay fixation rank pay personal pay Central Administrative Tribunal

Union of India v. M/S Vishva Shanti Builders (India) Pvt Ltd

27 Apr 2012 · Jasmeet Singh · 2024:DHC:5467
Cites 2 · Cited by 5

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award allowing contractor claims despite a No Claim Certificate signed under protest, emphasizing limited grounds for setting aside awards under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 No Claim Certificate Arbitrability of claims

Reliance Communications Limited v. Unique Identification Authority of India

20 Apr 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:5172
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting contract billing terms as payment based on aggregate call duration divided by 60 seconds and affirmed the arbitrator's power to remand SLA deduction issues for reconsideration after natural justice violations.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge contract interpretation connect minutes

Sant Lal v. State

15 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:3638-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Sant Lal for murdering his maternal uncle based on consistent circumstantial evidence, proper proof of post-mortem report, and call detail records, dismissing his appeal.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC circumstantial evidence post-mortem report

Ravi Kumar Meena v. State

11 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5108-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ravi Kumar Meena for culpable homicide not amounting to murder, ruling the stabbing was unpremeditated and occurred in the heat of the moment.

criminal appeal_dismissed culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 IPC intent to kill premeditation

Ravi Kumar Meena v. State

11 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5102-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld conviction for culpable homicide not amounting to murder where a fatal stabbing occurred in a sudden quarrel without premeditation, rejecting the State's claim of murder.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder Section 304 Part I IPC Section 302 IPC stabbing

Pappu Singh @ Raju v. State

10 Apr 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3636-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the life imprisonment sentence for a married man convicted of repeatedly raping a minor girl, rejecting the claim that the sentence was harsh or disproportionate.

criminal appeal_dismissed Section 376 IPC rape of minor life imprisonment DNA evidence

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:618-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until parity in rank with juniors is achieved.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army cadre merger promotion

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:619-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order directing retrospective promotions before repatriation from MES to Indian Army but rejected the claim to remain in MES until promotions are earned, emphasizing protection of seniority without indefinite delay of merger.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army promotion seniority