Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

HAV Dadaso Sampatrao Phadtare v. Union of India & Ors.

19 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2015:DHC:615-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal’s directions that personnel repatriated from MES to the Indian Army must be promoted retrospectively if eligible but cannot delay repatriation pending promotions, ensuring protection of seniority without indefinite retention in MES.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Military Engineering Service Indian Army merger of cadre promotion

Ponty Singh v. Anu Singh Bhatia

16 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1367-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, holding that having submitted to Singapore court jurisdiction, he cannot seek anti-suit injunction in India restraining foreign divorce proceedings on forum non-conveniens grounds.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant anti-suit injunction forum non-conveniens domicile jurisdiction

Navratan Baid v. Neetu Baid

12 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Yogesh Khanna · 2017:DHC:693-DB

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and granted divorce on grounds of cruelty, emphasizing equal treatment of spouses regarding infidelity and mental cruelty and recognizing irretrievable breakdown of marriage.

family appeal_allowed Significant cruelty divorce mental cruelty irretrievable breakdown

Zamrudpur Welfare Association v. South Delhi Municipal Corporation & Ors.

05 Mar 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:2709-DB

The Delhi High Court directed restoration of road widths and authentication of layout plans in Zamrudpur, highlighting failures in municipal governance and ordering coordinated administrative action to resolve encroachments and traffic issues.

administrative other Significant approved layout plan Nandi Vithi Marg road width encroachments

Lt. Col. Archana Shukla v. Union of India

24 Feb 2012 · Manmohan; Navin Chawla · 2021:DHC:2776-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 9

The Delhi High Court upheld the Supreme Court's 60% benchmark for Permanent Commission and dismissed petitions seeking stay of release of women officers assessed under the UAC appraisal system.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Permanent Commission Women Officers Unit Assessment Card (UAC) Annual Confidential Report (ACR)

Krishan Gopal Bakshi v. Delhi Development Authority

13 Feb 2012 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2018:DHC:2133
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking allotment of a flat under the closed NPRS-79 scheme due to delay and laches, holding that no mandamus can be issued after scheme closure and inordinate delay.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority New Pattern Registration Scheme 1979 Janta flat allotment mandamus

Golu @ Pankaj @ Sanjay v. State

02 Feb 2012 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4798-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of the appellant due to inconsistencies in dying declarations and identification, granting him the benefit of doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant dying declaration benefit of doubt identification murder

Govt of NCT of Delhi v. Vishambar Dayal

31 Jan 2012 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order reinstating a police constable dismissed for submitting a false caste certificate, holding that departmental proceedings are barred after criminal acquittal unless specific exceptions under Rule 12 of the Delhi Police Rules apply.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Police Rules Rule 12 DPPAR criminal acquittal departmental proceedings

Vanshika v. University of Delhi & Anr.

03 Jan 2012 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1236
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that a student eligible but unable to appear in first semester exams due to fee payment failure must be allowed to continue studies and appear in subsequent exams when permitted by university authorities.

administrative petition_allowed Significant university admission eligibility vs entitlement examination candidature estoppel

Directorate General, Border Security Force v. NIIT Technologies Limited

31 Dec 2011 · Navin Chawla · 2019:DHC:7252
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award interpreting a turnkey contract's delivery timeline as a single completion date, rejecting liquidated damages for intermediate delays and emphasizing limited judicial interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 turnkey contract liquidated damages

Ajay Malhotra & Anr. v. State Govt of Delhi

13 Dec 2011 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4358-DB

The Delhi High Court modified the murder conviction of Ajay Malhotra to culpable homicide not amounting to murder and acquitted Rahul Kohli, holding that no unlawful assembly with common object to commit murder was proved.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant unlawful assembly common object Section 149 IPC culpable homicide

PRADEEP v. STATE

07 Dec 2011 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5094-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a husband for murdering his wife in their matrimonial home, emphasizing the obligation on the husband to explain the death when present at the crime scene.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder matrimonial home adverse inference resiling witnesses

Cannes Property Management Services Private Limited v. Allahabad Bank

01 Dec 2011 · Sanjeev Narula · 2021:DHC:3230
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that a bank purchasing property under SARFAESI proceedings is not bound by an arbitration agreement in a separate maintenance contract executed by the previous owner absent clear assignment or consent.

civil petition_dismissed Significant arbitration agreement non-signatory succession in interest SARFAESI Act

Harish Bodh & Anr v. Kotak Mahindra Bank & Anr

22 Nov 2011 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:3801

The Delhi High Court held that applications under Order XXI Rule 90 CPC to set aside execution sale on grounds of fraud or irregularity must be filed within 60 days as per Article 127 of the Limitation Act, and Section 5 of the Limitation Act does not apply to condone delay in such applications.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXI Rule 90 CPC Limitation Act 1963 Section 5 Limitation Act Article 127 Limitation Act

MMTC Limited v. Transammonia AG Zurich

14 Nov 2011 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:2393

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award holding that the seller complied with contractual shipment obligations by delivering 42,000 MTs on time, entitling the buyer to pay for accepted goods despite non-delivery of the full contracted quantity.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Sale of Goods Act, 1930 draft survey report contractual delivery

DELHI METRO RAIL CORPORATION LTD v. SH JASPREET DHINGRA

14 Nov 2011 · C. HARI SHANKAR; AJAY DIGPAUL · 2025:DHC:1086-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that deleting a question with a typographical error and denying marks to candidates who correctly answered it was unjust, directing the awarding of marks to avoid prejudice.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination typographical error question deletion awarding marks

Mohd. Tanvir v. State

03 Nov 2011 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5789-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the life imprisonment convictions of two appellants for the murder of a child, relying on cumulative forensic, medical, and circumstantial evidence despite some procedural irregularities.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder Section 302 IPC DNA evidence forensic report

Mohd. Tanvir v. State

03 Nov 2011 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:5790-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellants for the murder of a child based on strong circumstantial and forensic evidence despite challenges to witness credibility and procedural aspects.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant murder circumstantial evidence DNA evidence forensic science laboratory

EXHIBITIONS PVT. LTD. v. BUSWORLD INTERNATIONAL CVBA

25 Oct 2011 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:7196

The Delhi High Court held that patent illegality is not a ground to challenge an international commercial arbitral award and directed deposit of the awarded amount under Claim II to maintain stay, while reserving jurisdictional issues on Claim I for further consideration.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant international commercial arbitration Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 patent illegality arbitrability

The University of Delhi v. Pratap Singh Bisht

11 Oct 2011 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2015:DHC:5558-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the University of Delhi's appointment of Shambhu Sharan Mishra by affirming the expert committee's discretion to relax eligibility criteria for PWD candidates and limiting judicial interference to cases of gross illegality.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant appointment relaxation of eligibility criteria PWD candidates expert selection committee