Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Santosh Kumar Rout v. Hyderabad Trade Expo Centre Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

11 Feb 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2015:DHC:11687

The Court dismissed the petition seeking termination of the arbitrator's mandate, holding that a party must await the arbitral award to challenge the arbitrator's impartiality after an unsuccessful Section 12 application.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 12 challenge Section 14 termination Arbitrator's independence

The Coca-Cola Company & Anr v. V.B. Rao trading as M/s. Om Sri VenkataSai Enterprises

11 Feb 2013 · S. Muralidhar · 2016:DHC:8473

The Delhi High Court granted permanent and mandatory injunctions against the Defendant for infringing the Plaintiffs' registered DANUBE BOTTLE shape trademark and KINLEY label, ordering recall and destruction of infringing products and awarding costs.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement Trade Marks Act 1999 permanent injunction mandatory injunction

Satish @ Madrasi v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi

03 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:644

Two criminal appeals before the Delhi High Court were disposed of by a common judgment referencing a detailed decision in a related appeal.

criminal other criminal appeal High Court of Delhi common judgment conviction

Satish @ Madrasi v. State (Govt. of NCT) of Delhi

03 Feb 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:640

The High Court of Delhi disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related appeal, without independent adjudication.

criminal other Procedural criminal appeal High Court of Delhi common judgment disposal of appeals

State v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.

03 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4150-DB

The Delhi High Court confirmed the death sentence of three accused for the brutal kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl based on overwhelming DNA and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping rape murder death penalty

State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.

03 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4154-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of three accused for the brutal kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on unshaken DNA evidence and voluntary confessions.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping rape murder death penalty

State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.

03 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4153-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and death sentence of three accused for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on unshaken DNA and forensic evidence along with corroborative witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping rape murder death sentence

State of Delhi v. Rahul Kumar & Ors.

03 Feb 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4152-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the death sentence of three accused for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a minor girl, relying on strong DNA and forensic evidence and proper procedural compliance.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant kidnapping rape murder death sentence

Coral Telecom Ltd v. Elcom Innovations Private Limited

01 Feb 2013 · V. Kameswar Rao, J · 2022:DHC:4837

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking appointment of an arbitrator, holding that no valid arbitration agreement exists between Coral Telecom and Elcom Innovations Pvt. Ltd. under the MoUs invoked.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Memorandum of Understanding Arbitration clause

Hari Om v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

31 Jan 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:606

The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal of Hari Om by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case.

criminal other criminal appeal conviction Delhi High Court common judgment

Mr. Rajiv Kapoor & Mr. Srikant Sharma, Advocates. v. CEC-HCC JOINT VENTURE .....

31 Jan 2013 · JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR O R D E R 20.03.2017 · 2017:DHC:1620

The Delhi High Court upheld a majority arbitral award granting delay damages to the contractor, rejecting NHAI's challenge on procedural and substantive grounds under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 challenge Extension of Time Contract delay

Liyakat Ali v. State

30 Jan 2013 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:577

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a police constable for attempted murder using his service revolver, rejecting his plea of self-defence and false implication.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC self-defence service revolver burden of proof

OIL INDIA LIMITED v. ESSAR OIL LIMITED

22 Jan 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:6788-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award favoring Essar Oil, holding that Oil India’s termination of the drilling contract was invalid and delay in pronouncing the award was not a ground to set it aside.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Contract termination Government clearance Blow-Out-Preventer

Florentine Estates of India Ltd & Anr. v. Lokesh Dahiya & Anr.

18 Jan 2013 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2022:DHC:4742

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition for appointment of arbitrator filed by Petitioner No.1 due to lack of locus standi and non-compliance with mandatory notice requirements under the Arbitration Act, rejecting invocation of the Doctrine of Group of Companies.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11(6) Section 21 Doctrine of Group of Companies

Janak Datwani v. C.N.A Exports Pvt Ltd & Ors.

17 Jan 2013 · Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:287

The Delhi High Court allowed amendment of the plaint to delete an erroneous admission regarding knowledge of fraud, holding that such admissions can be withdrawn if bona fide and necessary for proper adjudication, impacting limitation considerations.

civil appeal_allowed Significant amendment of plaint Order 6 Rule 17 CPC withdrawal of admission limitation

CRAYONS ADVERTISING LTD v. CRAYON ADVERTISING

17 Jan 2013 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:280

The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction restraining the defendant from using a domain name deceptively similar to the plaintiff's, holding prior user and likelihood of confusion sufficient for relief despite delay and difference in business fields.

civil appeal_allowed Significant passing off interim injunction prior user domain name dispute

Union of India and Anr v. Syed Sajid Ali

15 Jan 2013 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025:DHC:1246-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 41

The Court held that the effective date of suspension is the date of issuance of the order with immediate effect, and suspension extensions granted after 90 days without prior review are invalid, dismissing the Union of India's writ petition.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant suspension effective date CCS (CCA) Rules 1965 Rule 10(6) and (7) extension of suspension

DELHI PUNJAB GOODS CARRIER v. DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

10 Jan 2013 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2016:DHC:293-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, affirming that DDA's jurisdiction to seal property depends on whether the land is within a development area and that title vests in the acquiring authority post acquisition.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Development Authority Section 31A development area land acquisition

Sarika Jain v. Saran Singh Chhabra

06 Jan 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:73

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction order based on the landlord's bona fide requirement for business expansion, limiting its revisional jurisdiction to correcting gross illegality and granting the tenant one year to vacate the premises.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25B(8) eviction bona fide requirement

Sanjay Kumar v. Janak Rani Sawhney

06 Jan 2013 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:81

The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bonafide requirement, affirming that receipt of rent establishes landlord status under the Delhi Rent Control Act, and dismissed the tenant's revision petition challenging the eviction order.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act eviction bonafide requirement landlord-tenant relationship