Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
M/S. STORE ONE RETAIL INDIA LTD. v. M/S. TTK PRESTIGE LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that jurisdiction clauses in invoices specifying courts of delivery cities do not oust the jurisdiction of the Delhi Court where the main contract was formed, dismissing the appeal against summary decree for recovery of payment.
Sudhakar Tiwari v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award enforcing full license fee payment under an 'As is Where is Basis' parking license, rejecting claims of misrepresentation and procedural irregularities in arbitration.
Nyara Holdings Private Limited v. LMR Investments Private Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between three companies under Sections 391-394 of the Companies Act, 1956 after ensuring statutory compliances and addressing regulatory concerns.
Tricolite Power Products Private Limited v. Tricolite Electrical Industries Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation between two companies under the Companies Act, 1956 after addressing procedural and compliance concerns, including shifting the appointed date and rectifying annual return errors.
Manju Saxena v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that interim awards are tentative and remanded the matter for fresh adjudication on whether Manju Saxena was a workman or managerial staff, dismissing her appeal against the remand order.
Hongkong & Shanghai v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that interim awards are tentative and remanded the dispute for fresh adjudication on whether Manju Saxena was a workman or managerial staff, dismissing her appeal against the remand.
Hongkong & Shanghai v. Union of India; Manju Saxena v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that interim awards are tentative and remanded the dispute on Manju Saxena's workman status for fresh adjudication after proper evidence appraisal, dismissing her appeal against the remand.
AB Mauri India Private Limited v. Vicky Aggarwal & Ors.
The Delhi High Court granted an interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from using the mark 'TOWER' for dry fruits, enforcing a prior undertaking and finding prima facie trademark infringement under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act.
Ekta Shakti Foundation v. Government of National Capital Territory of Delhi
The court held that an arbitrator cannot grant interim relief to stay a contract termination order under Section 17 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and upheld the dismissal of the appellant's appeal.
Shikha Sharma v. Guru Harkrishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to 6th and 7th CPC benefits under Section 10 of the DSE Act, rejecting financial hardship and fee revision approval as preconditions.
Charanjit Kaur v. Guru Harkrishan Public School
The Delhi High Court directed the school to pay arrears and terminal benefits under the 6th and 7th CPC to the petitioner’s late husband’s estate with interest, affirming statutory entitlement and timelines for compliance.
Daljeet Kaur Bindra & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Jasneet Kaur & Ors. v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed unaided private school employees to be paid arrears and terminal benefits as per 6th and 7th CPC recommendations with interest, affirming their entitlement under law and prior judgments.
Sudha Katoch v. Directorate of Education
Delhi High Court directs unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears with interest, and pay terminal benefits to serving and retired employees in line with statutory and judicial mandates.
Maninder Kaur Sawhney v. Education Department & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that employees of unaided minority schools are entitled to salary revision and arrears as per the 7th CPC and directed payment of arrears with interest, while confirming the statutory gratuity ceiling.
Raghuvinder Kaur Grover v. Directorate of Education & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed an unaided minority school to implement 6th and 7th CPC pay revisions, release arrears and terminal benefits with interest, affirming employees' entitlement to pay parity with government schools.
Rakesh Kumar Bhagat & Ors. v. Guru Harkishan Public School & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that recognized private unaided minority schools are statutorily bound under Section 10(1) of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to implement 6th and 7th Pay Commission recommendations and pay arrears to their employees, rejecting claims of exemption based on minority status or financial constraints.
Jeetu Saini v. State NCT of Delhi
The High Court allowed the petitioner’s application to recall prosecution witnesses for further cross-examination under Section 311 Cr.P.C., emphasizing the accused’s right to a fair trial and directing the trial court to complete the process without undue delay.
Kafil Ahmad v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without providing separate detailed reasoning.
Kafil Ahmad v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court disposed of two criminal appeals by referring to a detailed common judgment in a related case without passing separate orders.