Delhi High Court

58,104 judgments

Year:
Showing 2024 — 8501 judgments found

M/S MONEYWISE FINANCIAL SERVICES PVT LTD v. M/S MALAD RESIDENCY THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR SH. THAJUDDIN K M

22 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9068
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate loan repayment disputes, holding that the petitioner fulfilled procedural requirements for invoking arbitration despite non-appearance of the respondent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 11 appointment of arbitrator arbitration clause loan agreement dispute

Deepak alias Gaurav v. The State Govt of NCT Delhi

21 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:9324

The Delhi High Court dismissed the bail application of the accused in a murder case, holding that bail cannot be granted where there is a strong likelihood of witness tampering and obstruction of justice in a heinous offence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant bail heinous offence murder Sections 302/34 IPC

Jain Cooperative Bank Ltd v. BSA Citi Couriers Pvt. Ltd.

21 Nov 2024 · Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav · 2024:DHC:9006
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal upholding the lower courts' decree for payment to a courier company, holding that proof of delivery is not a precondition for payment absent contractual stipulation and concurrent factual findings are binding.

civil appeal_dismissed concurrent findings of fact burden of proof proof of delivery contractual obligations

Ajay Aggarwal v. M/S Britannia Industries Ltd

21 Nov 2024 · Girish Kathpalia · 2024:DHC:9014

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal as barred by limitation, holding that the appellants failed to show sufficient cause to condone a 350-day delay in filing the appeal under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant condonation of delay Section 5 Limitation Act sufficient cause appeal limitation

Dr. Chayan Jain v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.

21 Nov 2024 · Jyoti Singh, J. · 2024:DHC:9794

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition of a medical officer seeking study leave to join a second PG course after abandoning a prior sponsored course, upholding the employer's decision based on CCS (Leave) Rules and operational considerations.

administrative petition_dismissed study leave DNB course PG (General Medicine) Municipal Corporation of Delhi

Imaging Solutions Pvt. Ltd. v. Hughes Communications India Ltd.

21 Nov 2024 · Rekha Palli; Saurabh Banerjee

The Delhi High Court set aside orders rejecting Section 34 challenges to an arbitral award for lack of reasoned consideration and remanded the matters for fresh adjudication on merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitral Award Section 34 Arbitration and Conciliation Act Specific Performance Patent Illegality

Sudhanshu Shekhar v. Jawaharlal Nehru University and Ors.

21 Nov 2024 · Prateek Jalan · 2024:DHC:9033

The Delhi High Court upheld JNU’s 30-year age limit for research students contesting Students’ Union elections, rejecting the petitioner’s plea for relaxation despite election delays caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Students’ Union elections age limit Lyngdoh Committee Supreme Court orders

Punjab National Bank v. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Delhi - V

21 Nov 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:9007-DB

The Delhi High Court remanded the matter to the Assessing Officer to reconsider the appellant's claim for business loss on HTM securities, holding that the ITAT erred in dismissing the claim for lack of substantiation despite documents being filed.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Held To Maturity securities capital gains business income Section 45(2) Income Tax Act

Nem Singh v. Union of India and Ors.

21 Nov 2024 · C. Hari Shankar; Amit Sharma · 2024:DHC:9054-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a medically decategorised railway servant is entitled to pay protection in the higher grade fixed retrospectively, without the need for actual physical discharge of duties post decategorization.

labor appeal_allowed Significant medical decategorization pay protection Indian Railway Establishment Manual Rule 1303

Rasoi Canteen and Caterer v. Atma Ram Sanatan Dharma College

21 Nov 2024 · Manmohan, CJ; Tushar Rao Gedela, J · 2024:DHC:9071-DB

The Delhi High Court directed awarding the canteen contract to the highest license fee bidder as per tender terms, correcting erroneous evaluation by the GeM portal.

administrative petition_allowed Significant tender evaluation highest license fee bidder canteen contract Quality & Cost Based Selection

Majestic Handicraft Private Limited v. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax Circle -16(1) New Delhi

21 Nov 2024 · Vibhu Bakhru; Swarana Kanta Sharma · 2024:DHC:8991-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the reopening of assessment under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act based on credible material indicating non-genuine suppliers and accommodation entries, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 148 Section 148A reopening of assessment

HCL Infosystems Ltd. v. Commissioner of State Tax & Anr.

21 Nov 2024 · Yashwant Varma; Dharmesh Sharma · 2024:DHC:9098-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that tax proceedings under the CGST Act against a company dissolved post-amalgamation are void and cannot be validated by procedural provisions, quashing the impugned notices and order issued against the non-existent entity.

tax petition_allowed Significant Amalgamation Scheme of Arrangement Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 Section 73 CGST

V B Engineers v. Dr Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital & Anr.

21 Nov 2024 · Tara Vitasta Ganju · 2024:DHC:9265

The Delhi High Court quashed a notice demanding damages for unauthorized occupation for failure to issue a mandatory show cause notice under Section 7(3) of the Public Premises Act, 1971.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971 Section 7(3) show cause notice unauthorized occupation

H. S. Oberoi Buildtech Pvt. Ltd and Ors. v. M/S MSN Woodtech

21 Nov 2024 · Chandra Dhari Singh · 2024:DHC:9273

The Delhi High Court upheld the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act, holding that the complaint was filed within limitation or with condonable delay, and refused to quash the complaint or summons against the petitioners.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act limitation period condonation of delay summoning order

Millennium & Copthorne International Limited v. CS Boutique Hotel Private Limited & Ors.

21 Nov 2024 · Amit Bansal · 2024:DHC:9308

The Delhi High Court granted summary judgment in favor of Millennium & Copthorne International Limited, restraining defendants from infringing its registered MILLENNIUM trademark and awarded damages for deliberate infringement and breach of prior settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trademark infringement passing off summary judgment Order XIII-A CPC

Ajay Kumar Bana v. State NCT of Delhi

21 Nov 2024 · Manoj Kumar Ohri · 2024:DHC:9361

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR under Section 25 of the Arms Act against a petitioner found with live cartridges in baggage, holding that mere physical possession without conscious knowledge does not constitute an offence.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 25 Arms Act conscious possession unconscious possession arms license

M/S BHARAT RAIL AUTOMATIONS PVT LTD v. NORTHERN RAILWAY & ANR

21 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9000

Delhi High Court granted extension of time till 30.11.2025 for completion of arbitral proceedings and making of Arbitral Award under Section 29A(4) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 with parties' consent.

civil petition_allowed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 29A(4) extension of time arbitral proceedings

Union of India v. M/S S. S. Engineers

21 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:9001
Cites 1 · Cited by 2

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award due to the petition being filed beyond the mandatory limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, refusing to condone delay caused by internal administrative errors.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34(3) condonation of delay limitation period

Shrawan Kumar Saraff v. M/S Gannon Dunkerley and Co. Ltd.

21 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8994
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

Delhi High Court held that the arbitration venue is the seat conferring jurisdiction on Delhi courts and appointed a sole arbitrator despite respondent's objections on jurisdiction, arbitrability, and pre-arbitration conciliation.

civil appeal_allowed Significant arbitration clause seat of arbitration venue of arbitration jurisdiction

Mother Boon Foods Pvt. Ltd. v. M/S. Bimbo Bakeries India Private Limited

21 Nov 2024 · Sachin Datta · 2024:DHC:8996
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to resolve disputes after parties failed to mutually agree following expiry of the previous arbitrator's mandate.

arbitration appeal_allowed Significant Section 11 Arbitration and Conciliation Act sole arbitrator appointment arbitral tribunal Section 29A(4) A&C Act