Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Rajender Kumar & Ors. v. State (Govt. of NCT, Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction for grievous hurt based on credible injured witnesses and medical evidence but granted probation subject to compensation and good conduct bonds.
Mahilayen Pragati Ki Or v. Govt. of NCT Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court directed inclusion of NGOs in Apex Body meetings and mandated comprehensive discussion of all issues, including police misconduct, ensuring participatory administrative oversight.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits under the Foreign Trade Policy, and the DGFT cannot exclude them by adding conditions beyond the policy's plain language.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits and the DGFT cannot exclude them by amending the Foreign Trade Policy through interpretation.
M/S YUM RESTAURANTS (I) PVT.LTD AND ANR v. UNION OF INDIA AND ORS
The Delhi High Court held that Indian subsidiaries of foreign companies are eligible for Served from India Scheme benefits and that DGFT cannot exclude them by amending the Foreign Trade Policy through interpretation.
Harish Chander v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that land acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act are deemed lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if possession is not taken or compensation not paid within five years, regardless of court stay orders, and that subsequent amendment ordinances cannot retrospectively affect vested rights.
Rakesh Kumar & Anr. v. Saroj Marwah & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that civil courts retain jurisdiction to grant relief of marshalling under Section 56 of the Transfer of Property Act despite pending recovery proceedings under the DRT and SARFAESI Acts, dismissing the bank's application to reject the suit.
Shri Lalit Kumar v. Shri Anil Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court recorded a lawful family settlement between disputing parties under Order 23 Rule 3 CPC, decreed the suit accordingly, and ordered de-sealing of disputed property, disposing of the appeals.
Supreme Court Bar Association v. Ram Pratap Vashist & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the acquittal of the accused in a criminal misappropriation case, affirming the benefit of doubt granted by the trial court due to doubtful prosecution evidence.
Ashok Kumar v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of a husband for suffocating his wife, rejecting his alibi and epilepsy defense, emphasizing the role of circumstantial evidence and burden of explanation under Section 106 Evidence Act.
Narender Singh Narang v. Harsha Capital Services Ltd.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the refusal to condone a four-month delay in filing a memo of appearance, holding that insufficient and unreliable evidence failed to justify the delay.
Prem Chand Sharma v. Gannon Dunkerley & Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court set aside an illegal termination for unauthorized absence not exceeding eight days, denied reinstatement, and awarded compensation including outstanding dues to the petitioner.
Dhan Singh v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition of a daily wage seasonal worker for reinstatement and back wages, holding that failure to prove 240 days of continuous service disentitles him from protection under the Industrial Disputes Act.
Makhan Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of Makhan Singh for the murder of his niece Madhu based on consistent witness testimony and forensic evidence, dismissing his appeal.
Haryana Petrochemicals Ltd. v. Central Provident Fund Commissioner and Anr.
The High Court remanded the appeal against provident fund dues assessment for fresh consideration of the effect of factory closure and BIFR proceedings, holding that liability continues until conclusive proof of establishment closure.
Medical Council of India v. Prashant Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court upheld that provisional registration cannot be denied to a foreign medical graduate who passed the Screening Test despite partial study at an unapproved Indian off-campus center, relying on Supreme Court precedent and non-retrospective regulatory amendments.
BSES Rajdhani Power Limited v. Government of NCT of Delhi
Delhi High Court issued notice and restrained CAG from submitting audit report of power distribution companies pending detailed hearing on the validity of audit orders under the CAG Act and Electricity Act.
Maula Baksh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for robbery but reduced the default sentence for non-payment of fine from two years to three months considering his poverty and prior service of substantive sentence.
Attar Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of a man for raping a 4-year-old child, affirming the reliability of child witnesses corroborated by medical evidence and rejecting claims of tutoring and conflicting testimony.
MAJ.GEN. V.K.SINGH RETD v. THE DIRECTOR CBI
The Delhi High Court held that a Special Judge under the Prevention of Corruption Act has the power under Section 156(3) Cr.P.C. to direct registration of an FIR and investigation, setting aside the dismissal of such application.