Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Resham Singh v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction of Resham Singh based on credible eyewitness and forensic evidence, rejecting his alibi and procedural objections.
Veena Devi v. Yogesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding that registered documents transferred ownership and not mortgage, emphasizing that oral evidence cannot contradict clear written terms absent fraud.
Deluxe Dentelles Pvt. Ltd. v. Ishpinder Kochhar
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease deed creates a month-to-month tenancy terminable by 15 days' notice, and a decree on admission for possession was rightly granted where rent escalation beyond ₹3,500 was admitted, excluding the tenancy from Rent Control Act protection.
Deluxe Dentelles Pvt. Ltd. v. Ishpinder Kochhar
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered lease deed creates a month-to-month tenancy terminable by 15 days' notice, and upheld a decree on admission for possession where rent exceeded ₹3,500 per month, excluding the tenancy from rent control protections.
Kuldip Sobti v. The Sub Registrar of Assurance-II A & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the Sub-Registrar must register sale deeds presented properly without refusing on grounds of ownership disputes or alleged fraud, which are to be decided by courts.
Savitri Devi v. Lal Chand
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding concurrent findings that the appellant failed to prove re-transfer of property rights, emphasizing the significance of delay and possession in property disputes.
Nafees @ Bhura v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court converted the appellant's murder conviction to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, upheld attempt to murder and robbery convictions, emphasizing the necessity of proving common intention for murder under Section 34 IPC.
Surender v. State of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions in one FIR while setting aside convictions in a cross FIR arising from the same incident, emphasizing that contradictory versions cannot both be accepted and reducing sentences considering the accused's antecedents and trial duration.
Thakur Rajesh Rana v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's discharge of accused persons under Section 302 IPC and directed framing of charges under Section 304 IPC based on prima facie evidence including oral testimony despite medical opinion indicating cardiac arrest.
M/S ANALCO (INDIA) PVT LTD. v. M/S NAVODYA EXIM PVT LTD.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction restraining use of the deceptively similar trademark ALOCOMAX, holding that even an application for registration evidences intent to use and supports a suit for infringement and passing off.
Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Pvt. Ltd. v. Dhara Dairy Foods Co.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and awarded compensatory and punitive damages to Mother Dairy for trademark and copyright infringement and passing off by Dhara Dairy Foods Co., proceeding ex-parte against the defendant.
Surender v. State of Delhi
Delhi High Court upheld convictions in one FIR while setting aside convictions in the cross FIR arising from the same incident, reducing sentences of first-time offenders to the period already served.
Shikha Mishra & Ors. v. S Krishnamurthy
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petitioners' transfer petition seeking to club a possession suit with a suit for specific performance, holding that the causes of action are distinct and the possession suit cannot be stayed or transferred.
Yogesh Suri v. Ashok Kumar and Ors.
The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation for a 45% upper limb disability victim by correctly assessing functional disability, applying the proper multiplier, and awarding full medical expenses, disfigurement, and future treatment costs.
Rakesh Kumar v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner's appointment as Physical Education Teacher was valid under deemed approval and age relaxation rules, setting aside the rejection order and directing release of salary from the date of joining.
National Insurance Company v. Swaraj Singh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the motor accident compensation award including prosthesis costs and loss of income, affirming 70% functional disability and 30% future prospects addition as just and not excessive.
Food Corporation of India v. M/S Dashmesh Rice & Genl Mills & Ors
The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award rejecting arbitration on the ground that the dispute was finally settled by a valid deed of settlement, barring reopening without setting aside the settlement.
Denvax Cellular Therapies P. Ltd. v. Amandeep Kaur
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking transfer of a suit from Tis Hazari to Saket courts, holding that territorial jurisdiction and timing of suits outweigh convenience of parties under Section 24 CPC.
Rajan Saha v. State Govt. of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant’s conviction for dacoity under Sections 395 and 412 IPC but reduced his sentence from ten to seven years considering mitigating factors.