Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Nawal Kishore Mehta v. Shashi Bansal @ Babli

10 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:781

The Delhi High Court held that in a property dispute involving forgery claims, the limitation period for a declaration suit begins only after final adjudication of forgery, allowing the suit filed within three years of such finality.

civil appeal_allowed Significant limitation cause of action declaration suit forgery

Machala & Ors. v. Manoj Kumar & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:772

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by awarding notional value for household services and increased non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court guidelines.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement loss of household services non-pecuniary damages

Sunita Kumari v. Sardar Dalbir Singh

10 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:771

Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying a higher multiplier, adding 50% future prospects, and increasing non-pecuniary damages in line with Supreme Court precedents.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation enhancement multiplier future prospects

State v. Lakhan @ Raju @ Gajinder

10 Feb 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:775-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition seeking leave to appeal against the acquittal of the accused, holding that the trial court's acquittal based on unreliable identification evidence was not perverse or illegal.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant appeal against acquittal eyewitness identification judicial test identification parade presumption of innocence

Archana Kumari v. M/S. G.D. Foods Manufacturing (I) Pvt. Ltd.

10 Feb 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:773

The Delhi High Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the petitioner did not complete 240 days of continuous service in the preceding year, dismissing her claim for reinstatement under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act.

labor petition_dismissed Section 25F Industrial Disputes Act continuous service 240 days requirement authorized leave

Mahender Singh v. State

10 Feb 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:774

The Delhi High Court held that the appellant was a juvenile at the time of the offence based on school records and remitted the matter to the Juvenile Justice Board for sentencing under juvenile law.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant juvenile justice age determination juvenile in conflict with law Rule 12 Juvenile Justice Rules 2007

Onkar Swarop Bhatnagar and Anr. v. M/S Drshticoin Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

10 Feb 2014 · V.K. Shali · 2014:DHC:788

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal condoning the delay in filing the written statement due to registry error and non-appearance, waived earlier costs, but imposed costs on the defendant for inconvenience caused.

civil appeal_allowed Significant condonation of delay written statement Section 148 CPC Section 151 CPC

National Insurance Co Ltd v. Raj Kumar and Others

10 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:761

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurance company's appeal to recover compensation paid from the driver and owner of the offending vehicle when the driver was found to be unlicensed at the time of the accident.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim insurance company recovery rights valid driving licence

Aruna Chadha v. State of NCT Delhi

10 Feb 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:753

The Delhi High Court granted bail to Aruna Chadha in a Section 306 IPC case considering delay in trial and her personal circumstances, without expressing opinion on the merits.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant bail Section 306 IPC abetment of suicide suicide notes

Sh. Rajesh Alias Khanna & Anr. v. Sh. Tej Pal Singh & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:783

The Delhi High Court upheld injunction protecting respondents' possession of property no. 26/1 against appellants' dispossession despite unresolved ownership and non-joinder of other heirs.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant injunction possession dispossession property dispute

Commissioner of Income Tax v. B.L. Passi

10 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:782-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the assessee's claim for depreciation on trucks given on hire, dismissing the revenue's appeal for lack of material to disprove ownership and use in business.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant depreciation claim ownership of asset hire charges Income Tax Act 1961

Navin Sikand v. State & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:777

The Delhi High Court held that dismissal of a succession certificate petition amounts to refusal allowing appeal, and a half-blood heir cannot claim succession certificate over full-blood heirs alive at the time of death.

civil appeal_dismissed succession certificate half-blood heir full-blood heir Hindu Succession Act, 1956

Rekha Devi & Ors. v. Union of India

10 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:784

The High Court dismissed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's rejection of compensation claim, holding the deceased was not a bona fide passenger and died while near the railway tracks, not by falling from the train.

civil appeal_dismissed Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 bona fide passenger statutory compensation train accident

Tarsem Singh v. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence

10 Feb 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:756
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's application for suspension of sentence under Section 37 of the NDPS Act, holding that prolonged custody and delay in appeal do not justify suspension without reasonable grounds to believe the accused is not guilty.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant NDPS Act Section 37 NDPS suspension of sentence commercial quantity

Rajesh @ Prem @ Pawan v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi

10 Feb 2014 · V.K. Jain · 2014:DHC:755

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for armed robbery under Sections 392/397 IPC, affirming that refusal to join TIP can be an adverse inference and that the prosecution proved the offence beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_dismissed robbery Indian Penal Code Section 392 Section 397

State v. Naresh & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · Reva Khetrapal; Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:760-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's appeal upholding the acquittal of accused in a dowry death case due to delay in FIR, inconsistent prosecution evidence, and lack of proof of cruelty proximate to death.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dowry death Section 304B IPC Section 498A IPC delay in FIR

Mukesh Mohan Goel & Ors. v. Asst. Engineer (Bldg) Central Zone South Delhi Municipal Corporation

10 Feb 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:787

The Delhi High Court dismissed a contempt petition holding that municipal authorities may remove encroachments on public land without prior notice, and such action does not constitute contempt if done lawfully after reconsideration.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant contempt of court municipal authority encroachment public land

National Textile Corporation Ltd v. Union of India & Anr

10 Feb 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:757-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the National Textile Corporation Ltd. is not liable for pre-nationalization dues of Shree Sitaram Mills Ltd. and quashed arbitration proceedings against it initiated by UCO Bank under the PMA scheme.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Textile Undertakings (Nationalisation) Act, 1995 Permanent Machinery of Arbitration liability for pre-nationalization dues arbitration jurisdiction

National Agro Chemicals Industtries Ltd. v. National Research Development Corporation

10 Feb 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:758-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the suit for royalties based on a defective technology license agreement was barred by limitation and set aside the decree ordering royalty payments and rendition of accounts.

civil appeal_allowed Significant license agreement royalty limitation defective technology

Commissioner of Income Tax (Central)-II v. Income Tax Settlement Commission & Anr.

10 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:785-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed the ITSC's grant of immunity to the assessee for failure to make full and true disclosure and cooperate as required under Section 245H(1) of the Income Tax Act.

tax petition_allowed Significant Income Tax Settlement Commission Section 245H(1) immunity from penalty and prosecution full and true disclosure