Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Rekha & Ors.

10 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:826

The Delhi High Court partially allowed the insurance company's appeal by reducing certain heads of compensation while upholding the addition of 50% towards future prospects for a young deceased self-employed person in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_partially_allowed Significant motor accident compensation future prospects funeral expenses loss of love and affection

Oriental Insurance Co Ltd v. Ouseph Joseph & Ors.

07 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:741

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal to recover compensation paid from the owner and driver where no valid driving licence was produced by them.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 driving licence insurance liability recovery rights

Sanjay Kumar v. State

07 Feb 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:739-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the life conviction of the appellant for the murder and sexual assault of a minor girl based on reliable circumstantial and forensic evidence, including credible child witness testimony.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence child witness Section 302 IPC Section 313 CrPC

State v. Rajesh Gosain & Anr.

07 Feb 2014 · Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:747
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition to cancel anticipatory bail granted to accused ex-employees in a cybercrime data theft case, holding that bail cannot be cancelled without cogent reasons when the accused are cooperating with investigation.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. cybercrime

State v. Rajesh Gosain & Anr.

07 Feb 2014 · Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:746
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's petition to cancel anticipatory bail granted to accused ex-employees in a cybercrime data theft case, holding that custodial interrogation was not necessary given their cooperation and absence of compelling reasons to revoke bail.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant anticipatory bail Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. Section 482 Cr.P.C. cybercrime

Suraj Bhan Thr GPA Holder & Ors. v. Union of India & Anr.

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:748

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that only persons interested in the acquired land are entitled to compensation under the Land Acquisition Act, and the appellants failed to prove forgery or any right to claim compensation for the acquired land.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Land Acquisition Act, 1894 compensation person interested forgery of Will

Kashmir Kaur v. Delhi Metro Rail Corporation

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:749

The court held that Section 4A proceedings under the Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 cannot vary the compensation amount awarded by a final judgment and are limited to awarding interest and penalty for delayed payment.

labor appeal_dismissed Employee’s Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A Section 30 compensation award

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Krishna Devi & Ors.

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:745

The Delhi High Court held that death resulting from an employee sleeping on the roof of a bus after duty is not compensable under the Employees' Compensation Act as it did not occur in the course of employment.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees' Compensation Act, 1923 course of employment compensation claim death on duty

M/S. GARMENT HOUSE AND ORS. v. SH. BHIM SAIN AND ANR.

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:744

The Delhi High Court dismissed the Regular Second Appeal upholding the decree for recovery of money for goods supplied based on concurrent findings of fact supported by documentary evidence.

civil appeal_dismissed Regular Second Appeal Section 100 CPC concurrent findings recovery of money

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD v. HARPAL SINGH & ORS.

07 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:743

The insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties even if the driver lacks a valid licence but can recover the amount from the insured or driver upon breach of policy conditions.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Motor Vehicles Act Section 149 Insurance liability Driving licence

Oswal Agro Mills Ltd v. Commissioner of Income Tax

07 Feb 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Vibhu Bakhrur · 2014:DHC:738-DB
Cites 3 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that disputed additional customs duty payable by the appellant only upon importers being called to pay is a contingent liability not deductible under the Income Tax Act, and bank guarantees do not constitute actual payment under Section 43B.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant contingent liability accrued liability additional customs duty Section 43B

Mohan Murti Shandilya v. Pyare Lal Taheem & Anr.

07 Feb 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:736-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the decree directing the lessee to pay rent arrears and charges after dishonour of rent cheques and lease termination by the lessors.

civil appeal_dismissed lease agreement rent arrears dishonour of cheque termination of lease

Mr Shailender Dahiya, Adv with in person. v. STATE .....

07 Feb 2014 · HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.K.JAIN 2014:DHC:737 · 2014:DHC:737

The Delhi High Court acquitted three appellants of robbery charges due to contradictory eyewitness testimony and inadequate proof linking recovered stolen articles to them.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery identification benefit of doubt recovery of stolen property

State v. Ashok Kumar Jain

07 Feb 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:742-DB

The Delhi High Court admitted the State's leave petition challenging acquittal due to investigative lapses, directed departmental action against the investigating officer, and emphasized the necessity of competent investigation for successful prosecution.

criminal other Significant investigation lapses acquittal burden of proof victim testimony

Pratap Singh and Ors. v. Jagjeewan

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:751

The Delhi High Court set aside interim relief granted in a suit barred by prior dismissed litigations, emphasizing the prohibition on repetitive suits and the invalidity of unregistered gift deeds as title.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC Section 11 CPC Order 23 Rule 1 CPC abuse of process

Savita v. Union of India

07 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:750

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal against the Railway Claims Tribunal's dismissal, holding that an independent eyewitness statement and the circumstances suffice to grant statutory compensation for death due to falling from a train despite absence of a train ticket.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 Railways Act, 1989 statutory compensation untoward incident

Rajeev Dhawan v. CPIO (Sh. N. Jayaraman) & Anr

06 Feb 2014 · The Chief Justice; Manmohan · 2014:DHC:722-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appellant's appeal seeking RTI disclosures and penal action against PNB officials, emphasizing adherence to prior judgments and condemning derogatory attacks on the judiciary.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Compassionate appointment Central Public Information Officer Mandamus

Master Gautam Yadav & Ors. v. Jagdish Yadav & Anr.

06 Feb 2014 · V.K. Shali · 2014:DHC:723

The Delhi High Court held that an oral partition recorded in a Will and followed by enjoyment of shares precludes a subsequent suit for partition, dismissing the plaintiffs' suit for lack of cause of action.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant partition oral partition cause of action Order 7 Rule 11(a) CPC

Anit Kumar v. Union of India & Another

06 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:727

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking direction to conduct an interview for retail petrol pump allotment under the SC category, holding that the advertisement was lawfully withdrawn due to non-availability of land and no vested rights arose.

administrative petition_dismissed advertisement withdrawal invitation to offer retail petrol pump allotment Corpus Fund Scheme

DELHI JAL BOARD v. A.P.CONSTRUCTIONS

06 Feb 2014 · VIPIN SANGHI, J. · 2014:DHC:729

The Delhi High Court upheld the arbitral award granting additional design fees and partial overheads to the contractor, modifying only the interest rate from 20% to 12% per annum.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 contract interpretation design fees