Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Satish Kumar v. M/S. Gandhi Smarak Nidhi

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:911

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that a private employer is not 'State' under Article 12 and contracts of personal service cannot be enforced, limiting the remedy for wrongful termination to damages.

civil appeal_dismissed private employer Article 12 Constitution of India contract of personal service enforcement of contract

Fatima Haron Sharma v. The State & Ors.

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:909

The Delhi High Court allowed a natural guardian's appeal permitting sale of a minor's property share under Section 8 of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956, subject to safeguards protecting the minor's interests.

family appeal_allowed Significant Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act, 1956 natural guardian minor's property sale of minor's share

Union of India v. Triveni

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:908

The Delhi High Court upheld compensation for a bona fide passenger who died from injuries sustained due to an untoward incident inside a train, emphasizing a purposive interpretation of the Railways Act and dismissing the Railway's frivolous appeal.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Railways Act 1989 untoward incident accidental falling compensation

Gaurav Kapoor & Ors. v. Union of India

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:916

The High Court held that a passenger holding a valid ticket remains bonafide despite accidental travel in the opposite direction within the city, and the Railways are strictly liable to pay compensation for death caused by an untoward incident under Section 124-A of the Railways Act, 1989.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Railways Act, 1989 Section 124-A bonafide passenger untoward incident

Bhuwan Chand v. NCT of Delhi

18 Feb 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:902

The Delhi High Court altered the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing grievous hurt under Section 308 IPC, reducing the sentence based on credible ocular evidence despite minor discrepancies in medical reports.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 308 IPC Attempt to murder Grievous injuries

Larsen & Toubro Ltd. v. Commissioner of Value Added Tax & Anr.

18 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:913-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the VAT Commissioner must issue prior notice and grant reasonable opportunity before directing a special audit under Section 58A of the DVAT Act, quashing orders issued without such procedure.

tax appeal_allowed Significant special audit Section 58A DVAT Act natural justice prior notice

Food Corporation of India Workers Union v. Food Corporation of India (Handling) Workers Union

18 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:912

The Delhi High Court held that disputes over trade union registration and name are exclusively governed by the Trade Unions Act, 1926, barring civil court suits and requiring aggrieved parties to seek remedy before the Registrar.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Trade Unions Act, 1926 registration of trade unions Section 10(b) Trade Unions Act civil court jurisdiction

Dharmender Singh v. Dildar Singh & Ors.

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:906

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against the dismissal of an application for enhancement of compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act, holding that no successive application is maintainable after a final award and that such dismissal is not appealable under Section 30.

labor appeal_dismissed Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 30 enhancement of compensation disability assessment

Hari Singh Yadav v. State

18 Feb 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:905

The High Court acquitted a police officer accused of bribery due to lack of conclusive evidence of demand and acceptance despite recovery of tainted money, emphasizing the necessity of proving both elements beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act bribery demand and acceptance trap and recovery

M/S BALAJI SALES CORPORATION & ORS. v. HIM ALLOYS & STEELS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR.

18 Feb 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:917

Delhi courts have territorial jurisdiction to try offences under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act where the cheque is presented and dishonoured, and the question of issuance as security is a triable issue.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act territorial jurisdiction dishonour of cheque Section 482 CrPC

Prem Chand v. State

18 Feb 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:919
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of police constables for corruption, affirming the validity of investigation, admissibility of scientific evidence, and application of presumption under Section 20 of the Prevention of Corruption Act despite minor procedural discrepancies.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 20 presumption Investigation by below ACP rank Section 293 CrPC admissibility

SBI Staff Residents Welfare Society v. Delhi Development Authority

18 Feb 2014 · Siddharth Mridul · 2015:DHC:1502-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a writ petition withdrawn without permission bars a fresh petition on the same cause of action unless a new cause of action arises or different petitioners file it, thus allowing maintainability of the present petition.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant writ petition maintainability withdrawal of writ petition fresh cause of action Article 226 Constitution of India

Perfetti Van Melle P.A & Anr v. Anil Bajaj & Ors

17 Feb 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:901

The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction to Perfetti Van Melle against defendants for infringing the registered 'STOP NOT' trademark and trade dress by using substantially identical packaging.

civil appeal_allowed Significant trade dress infringement passing off permanent injunction registered trademark

Sanwar @ Razzak v. State

17 Feb 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:884

Conviction under Sections 395/398 IPC cannot be sustained without proof of theft or carrying away of property, leading to acquittal of appellant despite injuries caused during attempted house-breaking.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery dacoity Section 395 IPC Section 398 IPC

Shri Kasturi Lal Mehra v. M/S Narshi Pharmaceutical & Surgical (P) Ltd

17 Feb 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:880

The Delhi High Court held that an Agreement to Sell does not affect a landlord's right to possession after lease expiry and allowed decree for possession on admissions under Order XII Rule 6 CPC.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Agreement to Sell Lease expiry Order XII Rule 6 CPC Possession

Krishan Ram v. State of the NCT of Delhi

17 Feb 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:896-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a husband for murdering his wife based on a complete chain of circumstantial evidence including his own disclosure to police, last seen evidence, motive, and failure to provide a plausible explanation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence Section 302 IPC last seen theory Section 106 Evidence Act

Mahesh Sunny Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, New Delhi

17 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:892-DB

The Delhi High Court held that parking services at airports are not taxable under service tax law for the relevant period and set aside the tax demand and penalties imposed on the appellant.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax airport services parking services Finance Act 1994

Mahesh Sunny Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner, Service Tax Commissionerate, New Delhi

17 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:893-DB

Delhi High Court held that car parking services at airports are not taxable under the Finance Act, 1994, and set aside service tax demand and penalties imposed on the appellant.

tax appeal_allowed Significant service tax car parking airport services Finance Act 1994

Pradyot K. Misra v. Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax Circle 40(1)

17 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R.V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:894-DB

The Delhi High Court quashed reassessment proceedings under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act against a retired IRS officer after finding the reopening based on factually incorrect allegations and held that such proceedings must be dropped when no basis exists.

tax petition_allowed Significant Section 148 Income Tax Act reassessment proceedings tax evasion petition limitation period

Mohinder Pal v. Lt. Governor and Ors.

17 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:899

The Delhi High Court held that pay protection under Fundamental Rule 22 applies only prospectively from 1989 and dismissed the petitioner's claim for retrospective pay fixation for recruitment in 1986.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant Fundamental Rule 22 pay protection retrospective application Central Public Sector Undertaking