Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Bhola Shanker & Ors. v. The State (N.C.T. of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal and set aside convictions under Section 304 Part-II IPC due to contradictory evidence and defective investigation, granting the appellants benefit of doubt.
Shakila v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the conviction of appellants for possession of counterfeit currency under Section 489C IPC but modified their sentences considering the period already served and mitigating factors.
Shakila v. The State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court affirmed the conviction of appellants for possession of counterfeit currency under Section 489C IPC but modified their sentences considering the time already served and mitigating factors.
ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Sonia & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company's appeal, holding it liable to pay compensation under the Employees’ Compensation Act for the death of an employee killed during employment duties, despite the absence of a valid driving licence, due to lack of specific pleading and proof.
Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. v. Saroj Singh and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurance company’s appeal, holding that liability for interest and penalty under the Employee’s Compensation Act depends on the insurance contract terms and that non-appearance after service precludes challenge to the Commissioner’s order.
Sh. Karan Singh & Others v. Sh. Gian Chand & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the second appeal upholding the validity of a registered sale deed executed without fraud and not violating the Delhi Land Reforms Act, while imposing costs for frivolous litigation.
Rasalika Trading and Investment Co. Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed the reassessment notice under sections 147/148 of the Income Tax Act for being based on material already available at the time of original assessment, holding such reopening as impermissible change of opinion.
Master Anil v. State
The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal permitting the natural guardian to sell the minor's share in agricultural land for the minor's welfare, directing deposit of sale proceeds in a fixed deposit with regulated withdrawals.
Manoj Kumar Goyal v. Jagdish Prashad Modi
The court held that where an acknowledgment of debt stipulates a payment period, the limitation period restarts from the expiry of that period, thus the suit filed after the last acknowledgment was within limitation.
Onassis Axles Private Limited v. Commissioner of Income Tax
The Delhi High Court upheld the addition of Rs. 80 lakhs as unexplained share application money under Section 68, holding that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness and creditworthiness of the share applicants.
Usha Rani Gautam & Others v. Devender Gautam
The Delhi High Court decreed partition of a property among siblings, defining equal shares and directing joint sale or execution of the decree if sale fails.
Dharampal Satyapal Limited v. Suneel Kumar Rajput & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff's 'Rajnigandha' trademark is well-known and granted permanent injunction restraining defendants from using confusingly similar marks and domain names.
MK MAHAJAN & ANR v. INDO ROLLHARD INDUST. LTD.
The Delhi High Court held that a winding up petition admitted on merits must be advertised before hearing, and appointed the Official Liquidator as Provisional Liquidator to take possession of the company's assets, affirming the finality of the admission despite procedural challenges.
Bijender @ Naushad v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of the appellant for robbery with use of a deadly weapon, holding that carrying a visible deadly weapon during robbery amounts to its use under Section 397 IPC.
Om Prakash Gupta v. State
The Delhi High Court set aside the summoning order under Section 138 NI Act for lack of prima facie evidence on cheque presentation within six months and remanded the matter for proper pre-summoning evidence.
Manju Jain v. Kirori Mal College and Anr
The Delhi High Court directed appointment of the petitioner as Administrative Officer after the first empanelled candidate declined, affirming the right of the next candidate on a valid selection panel to appointment.
Kuldeep Singh v. M/S Lucky Gold Star International Corporation
The Delhi High Court held that while the Labour Court lacks jurisdiction to grant interest under Section 33(C)(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, the High Court can grant equitable interest relief under Article 226, enhancing interest from 6% to 9% from the date of resignation.
Sunita Devi v. The Management of M/S IIT Haus Khas New Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that termination without following Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act is illegal if the workman has worked 240 days in any continuous 12-month period preceding termination and awarded compensation to the legal representative after the workman's death.
Rajesh v. The State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellant's conviction for robbery under Sections 392 and 397 IPC but set aside the fine imposed under Section 397 IPC, dismissing the appeal.
Deepak @ Rohit v. State
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal and upheld the conviction for robbery under Sections 392 and 397 IPC based on reliable eyewitness identification and corroborative medical evidence despite non-recovery of robbed articles.