Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Salam Kaviraj @ Chuha v. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

19 Feb 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:940

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions of four appellants for dacoity with murder based on reliable eyewitness dock identification and set aside the conviction of one appellant for dacoity, convicting him instead for possession of stolen property under Section 411 IPC.

criminal appeal_partly_allowed Significant dacoity murder identification parade dock identification

M/S. Narang Traders v. Anil Kumar and Anr.

19 Feb 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:936

The Delhi High Court upheld the illegality of termination but modified the Labour Court's compensation award, emphasizing discretionary monetary relief over automatic reinstatement in industrial disputes.

labor appeal_allowed Significant illegal termination industrial dispute compensation reinstatement

Muslim @ Salim v. The State (NCT of Delhi)

19 Feb 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:928

The Delhi High Court set aside convictions under Sections 398 and 308 IPC due to insufficient evidence of robbery and attempt to murder, limiting conviction to Section 324 IPC and ordering release of appellants after considering custody period.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant robbery attempt to murder voluntarily causing hurt Test Identification Proceedings

Mohd. Rafiq v. State (Govt of NCT) Delhi

19 Feb 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:930

The Delhi High Court set aside the enhanced conviction under Section 397 IPC due to lack of proof of use of a deadly weapon, upheld the robbery conviction under Section 392 IPC, and reduced the sentence accordingly.

criminal sentence_modified Significant Section 392 IPC Section 397 IPC robbery deadly weapon

Vinod Kumar Binny v. Speaker, Delhi Legislative Assembly & Anr.

19 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:927

The Delhi High Court stayed the application of the G. Viswanathan judgment to an expelled MLA pending Supreme Court reconsideration, holding that no disqualification proceedings barred its jurisdiction to examine the legality of the Speaker's letter.

constitutional appeal_allowed Significant expulsion from political party Tenth Schedule disqualification Article 212

Om Prakash @ Ram Kirpal v. State

19 Feb 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; G.P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:929-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of Om Prakash for murder and causing injuries, relying on credible eyewitness and medical evidence despite procedural lapses.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC Section 324 IPC child witness credibility homicidal death

Union of India v. R Jayachandran

19 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:943

The Delhi High Court set aside CIC orders directing disclosure of third party passport information for failure to apply RTI Act's privacy exemption and mandatory third party procedure.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(j) Section 11 procedure third party information

Union of India v. R Jayachandran

19 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:944

The Delhi High Court set aside CIC orders directing disclosure of third party passport and personal information for failure to follow mandatory RTI Act procedures protecting privacy.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(j) Section 11 third party information

Union of India v. R Jayachandran

19 Feb 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:945

The Delhi High Court set aside CIC orders directing disclosure of third-party passport information for failure to follow statutory safeguards under Sections 8(1)(j) and 11 of the RTI Act, emphasizing the protection of privacy rights in RTI disclosures.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Right to Information Act, 2005 Section 8(1)(j) Section 11 third party information

Reliance General Ins Co Ltd v. Amir Hassan & Ors.

19 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:935

The Delhi High Court allowed the insurer's appeal by reducing the future prospects addition from 50% to 30% for a 49-year-old deceased, thereby revising the compensation awarded in a motor accident claim.

civil appeal_allowed Significant motor accident claim compensation future prospects loss of dependency

Babli v. Roop Lal & Anr.

19 Feb 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:934

The Delhi High Court enhanced compensation in a motor accident claim by applying 50% future prospects addition for a young deceased and increasing non-pecuniary damages, while upholding income assessment based on the Minimum Wages Act due to lack of reliable proof.

civil appeal_allowed Significant compensation future prospects Minimum Wages Act, 1948 loss of dependency

Om Prakash Singhal v. K.L. Kurian

19 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:933
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court decreed possession in favor of the purchaser under the Apartment Ownership Act, holding that an unregistered agreement to sell cannot confer possession rights and no material issue arose to deny relief.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Apartment Ownership Act, 1986 possession ownership agreement to sell

Nitin Thomas v. National Medical Commission & Anr

19 Feb 2014 · C. Hari Shankar · 2024:DHC:1084

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition, upholding cancellation of the petitioner’s Eligibility Certificate and FMGE pass certificate due to failure in Physics and misrepresentation in the application, affirming strict compliance with medical education eligibility regulations.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Eligibility Certificate Foreign Medical Graduate Examination FMI Regulations 2002 Graduate Medical Education Regulations 1997

ZTE Corporation v. The Commissioner of Customs (Import & General) and Ors.

18 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:915-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that an overseas supplier retains ownership and is entitled to re-export goods abandoned by the importer after imposition of anti-dumping duty, directing Customs to permit re-export.

administrative petition_allowed Significant re-export ownership of goods abandonment of goods anti-dumping duty

Sucha Singh Sodhi v. Baldev Raj Walia & Anr

18 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:904

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of a suit for specific performance as barred by Order II Rule 2 CPC due to an earlier suit on the same cause of action, allowing such bar to be decided at the plaint rejection stage.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order II Rule 2 CPC Order VII Rule 11 CPC specific performance Agreement to Sell

SHRI VINOD KUMAR SHARMA & ANR v. SHRI VIRENDER KUMAR SHARMA

18 Feb 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:903

The Delhi High Court set aside an ex parte decree of specific performance for an oral property sale agreement due to failure to prove essential terms, payment of consideration, and survival of a compromised settlement.

civil appeal_allowed Significant specific performance oral contract immovable property family settlement

The New India Assurance Co Ltd v. Smt Mainwati & Ors.

18 Feb 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:914

The Delhi High Court upheld the imposition of interest and penalty under Section 4A of the Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 against an insurer and employer for delayed payment of compensation, dismissing the insurer's appeal for non-contestation and limitation objections.

labor appeal_dismissed Significant Employees’ Compensation Act, 1923 Section 4A Section 10 interest on delayed compensation

Vishal Kumar v. Commissioner of Income Tax

18 Feb 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; R. V. Easwar · 2014:DHC:918-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the transfer of the petitioner’s income tax assessment under Section 127 for coordinated investigation with the Eldeco Group, holding that such transfer orders require limited judicial scrutiny if reasonable opportunity is given.

tax petition_dismissed Significant Section 127 Income Tax Act transfer of assessment coordinated investigation nominee Director

Vinod Kumar Taneja v. M/S Indian Overseas Bank and Anr.

18 Feb 2014 · V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:907

The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful termination of an employee for wilful unauthorized absence without sanctioned leave and failure to respond to show cause notices, dismissing his writ petition challenging the termination.

labor petition_dismissed Significant termination of service unauthorized absence sanctioned leave show cause notice

Raman Kant Vaid v. State NCT of Delhi

18 Feb 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:910

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of Section 308 IPC charges due to lack of specific evidence attributing injury-causing acts to him, emphasizing the necessity of individual culpability absent common intention.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 308 IPC Section 34 IPC common intention injury causation