Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Vikramjeet Bhambri v. Sanjeev Jindal
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions under Article 227, holding that supervisory jurisdiction cannot be used to reappreciate evidence or interfere with the trial court's discretionary refusal of interim injunctions in tenancy possession suits.
State of NCT of Delhi v. Banti & Others
The Delhi High Court dismissed the State's application for condonation of a 1266-day delay in filing leave to appeal, holding that negligence and inaction do not constitute sufficient cause under the Limitation Act.
UNITED DECORATIVES PVT LTD v. DOLPHIN FOOTWEAR PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court admitted a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956, holding the respondent's defence of defective goods as a sham and not a bonafide dispute.
M/S PARIMAL MANDIR v. BHARAT VASI SUGANDHIT DHOOP & ORS
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunctions to the registered proprietor of the trademark "BHARAT VASI" restraining defendants from using identical or deceptively similar marks and packaging, holding such use as trademark and copyright infringement and passing off.
National Council of Education Research and Training v. Parash Ram & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal’s order invalidating suspension orders due to delayed review beyond 90 days under CCS (CCA) Rules, directing revocation of suspension and grant of consequential benefits.
Mohd. Farooq v. Smt. Mubassara and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that exclusive possession without documentary evidence does not establish tenancy, dismissing the appeal and affirming the appellant as a licensee liable to eviction.
Shanta L. Keshwani v. Pratima Keshwani & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that the plaintiff is the rightful owner entitled to possession and mesne profits of the disputed property, rejecting the defendants' claim of benami ownership and fiduciary relationship.
Microsoft Corporation & Anr v. Jayesh & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that under Section 30(4) of the Trade Marks Act, a trademark proprietor can restrain sale of unauthorized imported goods whose condition has been impaired, granting permanent injunction against sale of tampered XBOX consoles and pirated games.
United India Insurance Company Ltd. and Anr. v. M/S. XPS Cargo Services
The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal holding that the Delhi courts lacked territorial jurisdiction over a suit concerning loss of goods in transit, as the contract was entered into and performed outside Delhi.
Ram Narain Gupta v. Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The High Court dismissed the petition seeking quashing of summons under the DMC Act, holding that objections should be raised before the trial court at the notice framing stage under Section 251 Cr.P.C. and not prematurely under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Avnit v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that the respondents must operate the waiting list within its validity period to fill all vacancies and directed appointment of the petitioner accordingly.
Tauheed Mohammad v. Jamia Millia Islamia University
The Delhi High Court partially allowed appeals by Jamia Millia Islamia students, modifying their expulsion penalties to one academic year while upholding disciplinary action for distributing objectionable material, emphasizing prompt university action and proportionality in student discipline.
Tauheed Mohammad v. Jamia Millia Islamia University
The Delhi High Court partially allowed student appeals against expulsion for distributing objectionable pamphlets, holding university disciplinary action valid but modifying penalties to be proportionate and limited to the current academic year.
Tauheed Mohammad v. Jamia Millia Islamia University
The Delhi High Court partially allowed students' appeals against expulsion and permanent hostel debarment by Jamia Millia Islamia University for distributing objectionable pamphlets, emphasizing proportionality and procedural fairness in university disciplinary actions.
DELHI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD. v. THE GENERAL SECRETARY, CAMBATA AVIATION KARAMCHARI UNION
The Delhi High Court held that Delhi International Airport Pvt. Ltd. was neither a necessary nor proper party to an industrial dispute concerning payment of Variable Dearness Allowance by Cambata Aviation Pvt. Ltd. and set aside its impleadment by the Industrial Tribunal.
Bhawna Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 366A IPC for inducing a minor to illicit intercourse, acquitting on charges of wrongful confinement and abetment of rape, emphasizing inducement and consent principles in sexual exploitation cases.
Bhawna Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for criminal conspiracy and inducement of a minor girl to illicit intercourse under Section 366A IPC, while acquitting on charges of wrongful confinement and abetment of rape due to lack of evidence.
Bhawna Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for inducing a minor girl to illicit intercourse under Section 366A IPC, emphasizing inducement and criminal conspiracy despite absence of confinement or credible threats.
SUNDER @ SUNDERI DEVI v. RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE CO LTD
The Delhi High Court held that an Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation despite loss of the policy cover note if it fails to inform the insured or authorities, allowing the appeal and directing the Insurance Company to pay compensation initially.
Bhawna Garg v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for inducing a minor girl to illicit intercourse under Section 366A IPC, emphasizing inducement and consent principles while acquitting on wrongful confinement and abetment of rape charges.