Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Roshan Lal & Ors.
The High Court held that lawful termination without departmental enquiry is valid when enquiry is dispensed with due to prolonged unauthorized absence, and treating absence as extraordinary leave does not condone misconduct.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Himal K. Parikh
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and enforced the arbitral award by passing a decree against the defendant who failed to appear.
M/S MS SHOES EAST LTD v. M/S KM CAPITAL LTD
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration proceedings under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and decreed the arbitral award in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant who failed to appear or file objections.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Munjal Investment
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and decreed the arbitral award in favour of the plaintiff in absence of defendant's objections.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Hemdev Securities (India) Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration proceedings under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and enforced the arbitral award by passing a decree against the defendant in absence of objections.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Kirit Kumar Shah
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 and made the arbitral award a rule of the court, passing a decree with interest in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant who failed to appear.
Komal Jain v. Union of India & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the Settlement Commission has jurisdiction over misdeclaration cases including smuggling, and applicants must pre-deposit accepted customs duty and interest before filing under Section 127B of the Customs Act.
Naresh Gupta v. State (NCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 302 IPC based on the third reliable dying declaration despite inconsistencies with earlier declarations, emphasizing the court's discretion in evaluating multiple dying declarations.
Shri Harbans Lal v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Fair Price Shop license imposed 18 years after conviction, holding that unexplained delay and repeated license renewal amounted to condonation of the petitioner’s conduct.
M/S. Bharat Stores v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Fair Price Shop license due to inordinate delay and condonation of the licensee's conduct, emphasizing discretionary power and protection against double punishment.
Surinder Pal v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a fair price shop license imposed after an 18-year delay post-conviction, holding that unreasonable delay and repeated license renewals amounted to condonation and that cancellation under Clause 7 is discretionary.
Mohit Kumar v. Himalayan Institute Hospital Trust
The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking transfer of suits between courts of concurrent jurisdiction, holding that mere inconvenience does not justify transfer under Section 24 CPC absent risk of denial of justice.
M/S. Ram Lubhaya v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a fair price shop licence imposed after a 20-year delay, holding that such delay and repeated licence renewals amounted to condonation and the petitioner could not be penalized for his father's offence.
M/S HARKARAN DASS DEEP CHAND v. VIREN AGROTECH PVT LTD
The Delhi High Court upheld a summary decree under Order XXXVII CPC for recovery of money based on dishonored cheques and invoices, holding that failure to appear after substituted service admits plaint allegations.
M/S. Surinder Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Fair Price Shop license imposed after a 22-year delay post-conviction, holding that unexplained delay and repeated license renewals amounted to condonation barring such administrative action.
M/S. Harvinder Singh v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed the cancellation of a Fair Price Shop license imposed nearly 19 years after conviction, holding that unexplained delay and repeated renewals condoned the petitioner’s conduct and discretionary cancellation was unjustified.
Shri Hukam Chand v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed a 20-year delayed show cause notice for licence cancellation, holding that unexplained delay and licence renewal amounted to condonation, and administrative cancellation post-conviction does not constitute double jeopardy.
M/S. Rattan Lal v. Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court quashed a show cause notice for cancellation of a fair price shop licence issued after a 23-year delay, holding that such delayed administrative action is unjustified and barred by condonation.