Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

NEO MILK PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. NEO FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED

21 Mar 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:1556-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld an interim injunction protecting the registered trademark 'NEO' against alleged prior use by the appellant, dismissing the appeal for failure to prove prior continuous use under Section 34 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

intellectual_property appeal_dismissed Significant Trademark infringement Interim injunction Trade Marks Act 1999 Section 29(4)

State v. Harbhajan Singh

21 Mar 2014 · Indermeet Kaur · 2014:DHC:1566

The Delhi High Court upheld the acquittal of the accused in a food adulteration case due to failure of the prosecution to produce a representative and properly sealed sample as required under Rule 22A of the PFA Rules.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Rule 22A PFA Rules representative sample food adulteration

Shiv Narain Singh Sidhu v. Central Bureau of Investigation

21 Mar 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:1569
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court quashed charges against the petitioner under Sections 120B, 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC and Prevention of Corruption Act for lack of prima facie evidence, holding that statements from another FIR and mere countersigning of documents do not justify framing charges.

criminal petition_allowed Significant framing of charges Section 482 CrPC prima facie case Section 164 CrPC statements

M/S SSJ Finance and Securities Pvt Ltd v. Prabhat Stock Shares Brokers Pvt. Ltd.

21 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1568

The Delhi High Court upheld an arbitral award in a share purchase dispute, emphasizing strict adherence to contractual timelines for raising objections in stock market transactions and limiting court interference under Section 34 of the Arbitration Act.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 objections Stock market transactions Contractual timelines

Mind Gym Ltd v. Mindgym Kids Library Pvt Ltd

21 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1551

Delhi High Court upheld plaintiff’s registered trademark rights in MIND GYM, granted injunction against defendant’s use of deceptively similar mark MINDGYM, recognizing trans-border reputation and rejecting defendant’s claims of descriptiveness and prior use.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Trademark infringement Passing off Trade Marks Act 1999 Trans-border reputation

Sh. Mohinder Singh Verma v. J.P.S Verma & Anr.

21 Mar 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:1567

The Delhi High Court held that an absolute registered Gift Deed is irrevocable except on grounds of fraud or undue influence pleaded within limitation, and dismissed the suit challenging the gift.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Gift Deed Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Revocation of Gift Undue Influence

RSG Shares and Stocks Brokers Ltd. v. Neelima Goel

21 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1565

The Delhi High Court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order that annulled the arbitral award, and remanded the matter to determine if objections under Section 34 were filed within limitation before considering their merits.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 objections Limitation period Receipt of arbitral award

S K Srivastava v. Union of India & Ors.

21 Mar 2014 · Veena Birbal · 2014:DHC:1563

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the Attorney General's refusal to grant consent for criminal contempt proceedings, holding that no prima facie case was made and personal hearing was not mandatory.

criminal petition_dismissed Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 Section 15 consent Attorney General discretion criminal contempt

Harish @ Bunty v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)

21 Mar 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:1552

The Delhi High Court disposed of the criminal appeal by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related appeal, without issuing a separate judgment.

criminal other Procedural criminal appeal disposal by reference common judgment Delhi High Court

Vinod @ Ajay v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)

21 Mar 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:1553

The criminal appeal filed by Vinod @ Ajay was disposed of by referring to a detailed common judgment delivered in a related appeal, without separate reasoning.

criminal other Procedural appeal disposal common judgment criminal appeal High Court of Delhi

Prakash Mali @ Dabbi v. State of Delhi

21 Mar 2014 · V. K. Jain · 2014:DHC:1555

The Delhi High Court reduced the appellant's conviction from attempt to murder under Section 307 IPC to voluntarily causing hurt by dangerous weapons under Section 324 IPC, granting probation and ordering compensation.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 324 IPC Attempt to murder Intention to cause death

The New India Assurance Company Ltd v. Kishan Singh Chauhan

21 Mar 2014 · Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1557

The Delhi High Court dismissed the insurer's appeal, holding that failure to prove forgery of the insurance cover note and non-insurance of the vehicle does not absolve the insurer from liability to pay compensation.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant insurance liability forged cover note compensation Order XXII Rule 8 CPC

Delhi Transport Corporation v. Ram Kanwar

21 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1560

The Delhi High Court held that compensation under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 is payable despite continued employment without loss of pay, but the loss of earning capacity must be properly determined before awarding compensation for permanent partial disability.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Employees Compensation Act, 1923 permanent disability loss of earning capacity compensation

Nirmal v. Ramesh Kumar

21 Mar 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:1559

The Delhi High Court upheld the decree for possession and arrears of rent, holding that service of summons in a suit can validly terminate tenancy under Section 106 of the Transfer of Property Act.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant tenancy termination Section 106 Transfer of Property Act service of summons as notice suit for possession

M I Hussain & Anr. v. Director of Education & Anr.

21 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1546-DB

The Delhi High Court held that librarians in recognized private schools are not teaching staff for retirement and re-employment benefits, limiting parity under the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 to monetary benefits only.

labor appeal_allowed Significant Librarian status Teaching post Delhi School Education Act 1973 Section 10

Dharambir Singh v. Union of India

21 Mar 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Jayant Nath · 2014:DHC:1545-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of a BSF Lance Naik for leaving post without orders and intoxication, validating the Summary Security Force Court trial despite procedural challenges.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Summary Security Force Court BSF Act 1968 BSF Rules 1969 intoxication

Bharat Glass and Plywood Co v. Sushan Pal Soni

21 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1550

The Delhi High Court set aside the dismissal of leave to defend in an eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding that the tenant raised triable issues on the landlord's bonafide requirement and remanded the matter for trial.

property appeal_allowed Significant bonafide requirement leave to defend Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition

Hari Shankar Sharma v. Central Bureau of Investigation

21 Mar 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:1549
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of a Junior Engineer for accepting bribe under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, while modifying the sentence to a lesser term.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Section 7 PC Act Section 13(1)(d) PC Act Section 13(2) PC Act

Amarjeet Athotra v. Maninder Singh

21 Mar 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:1554

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction orders rejecting condonation of delay in rent arrears deposit under the Delhi Rent Control Act, emphasizing limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227 and granted tenants one year to vacate the premises.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(a) Section 15(1) condonation of delay

Preetesh Raman Singh v. Delhi High Court Through Registrar General

21 Mar 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; Suresh Kait · 2014:DHC:1548-DB

The Delhi High Court held that eligibility for the Delhi Judicial Service Examination must be satisfied on the last date of application submission, dismissing a petition by a candidate not qualified as an advocate by that date.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Judicial Service Rules, 1970 eligibility criteria cut-off date Advocates Act, 1961