Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Nishant S. Diwan v. High Court of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the 3% reservation for persons with disabilities under the Disabilities Act applies to Delhi Higher Judicial Service posts, and exclusion thereof is discriminatory and unlawful.
Nagandra Singh v. Director General ITBP & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a review promotion committee must apply the original grading criteria for promotions and dismissed the petition challenging the petitioner’s grading and ranking.
K. Pradeep Kumar v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court held that refusal of concurrence by the parent employer for absorption of a deputationist by the Intelligence Bureau was illegal and directed reconsideration in accordance with extant policies.
Pfizer Products, Inc v. R.K. Singh & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages to Pfizer for infringement and passing off of its registered trademark "VIAGRA" by defendants using the deceptively similar mark "VIHAGRA".
Delhi Transport Corporation v. The Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal No. 1 and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that illegal termination of a daily wager under Section 25-F does not mandate reinstatement and awarded compensation instead.
Guru Swarup Srivastava v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed modification of bail conditions in Section 138 NI Act cases permitting the petitioner to furnish Fixed Deposit Receipts and surety through his wife to secure his presence at trial.
Inder Raj Malhotra v. Canara Bank & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a suspension order against an employee of a merged bank continues to operate despite the merger and Supreme Court directions granting continuity of service, and dismissed the review petition challenging this position.
TEERTHANKER MAHAVEER UNIVERSITY ..... Petitioner Through Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Dhruv Kapur, Mr. Vijayender Kumar, Ms. Megha Bansiwal, Advocates v. KESHAV DESIRAJU .....
The Delhi High Court disposed of the contempt petition regarding delay in nomination to the Medical Council of India after respondents assured imminent compliance and petitioner withdrew the petition.
Rajiv Kumar Gupta v. S.C. Swami
The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit for refund and damages against an Ayurvedic doctor, holding that the Delhi courts lacked jurisdiction and the suit was barred by limitation despite the petitioner’s claimed mental illness.
Rikesh Kumar Gaur v. Devi Charan Sharma & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the appellate court's modification directing the bank to keep the jointly held FDR proceeds in abeyance, affirming the appellate court's power under Order 41 Rule 33 CPC to modify decrees to do justice.
Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. Sh. Jai Pal and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the Industrial Tribunal’s award directing regularization of a muster roll employee as Electric Motor Driver based on employer’s admission and established principles of point-to-point regularization.
Naveen Arora and Ors. v. Suresh Chand
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of tenants under Section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, recognizing the landlord’s bona fide need for the tenanted shop to carry on his cloth business in Chandni Chowk.
Manoj Gulshan v. Jai Dev Gulshan & Anr.
The Delhi High Court allowed the appellant to exhibit original documents after initially filing photocopies and restored the suit for final arguments, relying on the principle that documents can be exhibited absent objections, especially when defendants are ex parte.
State v. Deepak Bansal
The High Court upheld the acquittal of a food vendor accused of adulteration, ruling that non-refrigeration of a perishable milk product sample rendered it unfit for analysis and created reasonable doubt.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Union of India and Anr
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT’s order directing MTNL to grant out of turn promotion to a sportsperson employee based on his medal-winning achievements, rejecting the employer’s arbitrary denial.
Rohtash v. State
The Delhi High Court affirmed the appellant's conviction for robbery but modified the sentence considering the period of incarceration already served.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Rajendra Nahata
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration proceedings under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and decreed the arbitral award in favor of the plaintiff against the ex parte defendant.
Vaibhav Bhatia & Anr. v. M/S L&T Finance Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of time-barred objections to an ex parte arbitral award, holding that returned postal notices constituted valid service under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. Arihant Credit Capital Market Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and decreed the arbitral award in favor of the plaintiff in an ex parte suit for recovery of underwriting liability.
MS Shoes East Ltd. v. W.G.F. Securities Ltd.
The Delhi High Court allowed extension of arbitration time under Section 28 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 post-award and enforced the arbitral award by passing a decree with interest and costs against the defendant who failed to appear.