Delhi High Court
36,666 judgments
Deepak Kumar and Ors. v. Sashastra Seema Bal & Anr.
The Delhi High Court disposed of a writ petition as infructuous after the disputed candidate was recruited, resolving the petitioners' grievance.
Thales Dis India Pvt Ltd v. Tatvik Biosystems Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that written acknowledgments via email reset limitation under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, upheld contractual interest on overdue payments, and decreed recovery with pendente lite and future interest.
Sanjeev Yadav v. Seema
The Delhi High Court set aside the trial court's dismissal of a limitation-based application to reject plaint in a loan recovery suit, directing fresh consideration in accordance with law.
Bank of Baroda v. Gurdev Singh Minhas & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order prohibiting recovery of excess pension payments from a retired employee when the excess arose due to employer's error, affirming that such recovery is impermissible in law.
Union of India and Ors. v. Akil Ahmad
The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's quashing of suspension extension orders passed beyond 90 days without timely review, clarifying that suspension periods under CCS (CCA) Rules commence from deemed suspension date unless detention continues beyond 90 days.
Surje Ram Kataria v. K K Mishra & Anr.
The court upheld the cooperative society's 2009 resolution on parking slot exchange and allowed parties to continue using their respective parking spaces, setting aside the arbitration award favoring the petitioner.
Chandan Kumar v. Union of India and Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition seeking pro rata pension for armed forces service, directing the petitioner to pursue the remedy before the Armed Forces Tribunal, reaffirming the Tribunal's exclusive jurisdiction over such service matters.
National Insurance Co. Ltd v. Md. Safat
The Delhi High Court upheld a compensation award assessing 100% loss of earning capacity despite 20% physical disability, held insurer liable for compensation and interest, and imposed penalty solely on the employer under the Employee’s Compensation Act.
M/S Civic Engineers (India) v. Surender L. Meena
The Delhi High Court held the DDA official guilty of contempt for wilfully disobeying its order to convert the petitioner's property from leasehold to freehold in accordance with sanctioned plans and DDA policy.
Major Shubhra Verma v. Lieutenant General Gurbirpal Singh
The Delhi High Court held that the DG, NCC is the Disciplinary and Appellate Authority under the POSH Act for the petitioner and must afford her a personal hearing before deciding her appeal, emphasizing adherence to natural justice and statutory mandates.
TDI Infratech Limited v. Government of NCT & Anr.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR alleging cheating and criminal breach of trust by a real estate developer for collecting payments without approvals and failing to allot the promised commercial plot.
F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG & Anr. v. Natco Pharma Limited
The Delhi High Court granted interim injunction upholding the validity of the species patent for Risdiplam, rejecting the defendant's challenge based on anticipation by the genus patent and foreign admissions, balancing patent protection with public interest.
Rajni Singh v. Chattar Singh Saini & Ors.
The High Court held that once parties are impleaded without objection, they cannot be deleted from the suit merely due to procedural applications, and they must be allowed to participate in the proceedings.
SAVERA REALTY PVT LTD v. SABYASACHI CHAKORBORTY
The Delhi High Court allowed restoration of a dismissed execution petition, holding that dismissal for non-prosecution is improper when only proxy counsel appears and there is no opposition.
Westend Green Farms Society v. Kapil Kumaria & Anr.
Petitions challenging deletion of a defendant were dismissed as infructuous after the underlying suits were rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.
M/S. GURUDUTT KAILASH CHAND SHARMA v. YASHANSH CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.
The High Court held that rejection of a plaint under Order VII Rule 11 CPC is a decree appealable under Section 96 CPC, and a petition under Article 227 challenging such rejection is not maintainable.
Avalon Projects A Unit of GRJ Distributors and Developers Private Limited v. Suresh Chandra Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that only the High Court of the territorial jurisdiction where the cause of action arose can entertain such challenges to NCDRC orders.
Avalon Projects A Unit of GRJ Distributors and Developers Private Limited v. Narendra Kumar Goyal
The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition under Article 227 for lack of jurisdiction, holding that the jurisdictional High Court where the cause of action arose must be approached in consumer dispute appeals against NCDRC orders.
Shanti Devi v. Om Wati Devi
The Delhi High Court upheld the Trial Court's order permitting the plaintiff's Power of Attorney to depose due to the plaintiff's incapacity, dismissing the petition challenging the same.
Munawwar Ali and Ors. v. Mohd Danish and Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of the petitioners' application to reject the plaint, holding that the suit discloses a cause of action despite a pending eviction petition under the Delhi Rent Control Act.