Delhi High Court
58,104 judgments
M/S Kamal Builders v. M/S K K Spun India Limited
The Delhi High Court appointed a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate disputes arising from a subcontract agreement after parties failed to agree on tribunal constitution.
Rajni Batra & Ors. v. Naveen Batra Alias Yashpal Batra
The Delhi High Court upheld the reduction of interim maintenance to ₹22,000 per month, affirming the husband's legal obligation to support his wife and daughters despite claims of unemployment and medical conditions.
M/S WILLUS INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD v. M/S ANIKAR INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED
The Delhi High Court constituted a Sole Arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that a deficiency in stamping does not bar arbitration and confining proceedings to the parties to the arbitration agreement.
National Agricultural Cooperative Marketing Federation of India v. Disha Impex Pvt. Ltd.
The court held that in execution proceedings filed within one year of a decree, attachment without notice is discretionary and must be exercised only when notice would cause delay or defeat justice, directing issuance of notice and opportunity to the judgment debtor before attachment.
Sajal Saha v. Union of India
The Delhi High Court directed a fresh and final medical examination for the petitioner due to conflicting medical opinions on his fitness for AFCAT, ensuring a fair resolution of the dispute.
Union of India & Ors. v. Lt Col VS Hosalli
The Delhi High Court upheld the Armed Forces Tribunal's order granting disability pension to a retired Lt. Col, affirming that medical opinion of disability aggravation due to military service justifies pension benefits.
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED v. ANG LIFE SCIENCES INDIA LTD & ANR
The Delhi High Court appointed a sole arbitrator under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 to adjudicate lease-related disputes and directed interim relief applications to be decided by the arbitrator under Section 17.
Mukhtyar Singh & Ors. v. Delhi Development Authority
The Delhi High Court held that acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapsed under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act due to non-possession and non-payment of compensation, restraining DDA from disturbing petitioners' possession without due process.
Purnima Singh v. Delhi Development Authority & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the lawful allotment of land for a Gurudwara within a residential zone, dismissing the petition challenging the modification of the layout plan and confirming that no violation of the Master Plan or fundamental rights occurred.
Rajeev @ Sonu & Anr. v. State Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction under Section 397 IPC despite absence of TIP and non-recovery of weapon, relying on credible eyewitness testimony and corroborative evidence.
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/s Gragerious Projects Pvt. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court upheld ITAT's deletion of penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, holding that vague penalty notices failing to specify the charge violate natural justice and cannot sustain penalty orders.
Designco v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that handcrafted stone articles are correctly classifiable under ITC(HS) 68159990 for MEIS benefits and quashed recovery demands made without due process under the Customs Act.
All India Institute of Medical Sciences v. Sanjay Gupta & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that suspension can only be extended by a formal order issued and communicated before expiry of 90 days, and mere file noting approval does not suffice, invalidating the extension order issued after the period.
Jeet Kumar Sohra v. Office of the Principal District and Sessions Judge
The Delhi High Court directed respondents to consider the petitioner's representation regarding promotion benefits within eight weeks and allowed revival of contempt proceedings if aggrieved.
Anil Dutt Sharma v. Rahul Mehra & Ors.
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking contempt proceedings, holding that dismissal of the earlier petition as infructuous precludes contempt action absent fresh evidence of non-compliance.
The Press Club, Mumbai v. Press Council of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed the arbitrary rejection of the Mumbai Press Club's claim by the Press Council's Scrutiny Committee and directed its notification as an Association of Persons under the Press Council Act.
Tajuddin v. Qazi Nooruddin
The Delhi High Court granted the tenant additional time to vacate the premises by 31.07.2025 subject to payment of arrears and filing an undertaking, staying the eviction order on these conditions.
Nuraisah Khatoon v. Iffco Tokio General Insurance Co. Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that insurance claims under the government-mandated Pravasi Bharatiya Bima Yojana are amenable to writ jurisdiction and directed the insurer to process delayed claims upon condonation certificates, emphasizing the scheme's welfare objectives over procedural delays.
Ishita Varshney Jain v. ACIT, CEN CIR-31, Delhi
The Delhi High Court set aside notices under Section 153C of the Income Tax Act against the petitioner, holding that no incriminating material pertaining to her was found during the search to justify issuance of such notices.
Ganesh Grains Ltd. v. Dharmendra Kumar Gupta
The Delhi High Court allowed the petition to cancel the respondent’s deceptively similar trademark "GANESH HARA MATAR" for non-use and infringement of the petitioner’s prior "GANESH" mark.