Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Manoj Kumar Mudgal v. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi; Rajeev Tokas v. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi

28 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3533

The Delhi High Court dismissed petitions seeking regularization and reinstatement of temporary contractual Swimming Coach-cum-Life Guards at IIT Delhi, holding that contractual appointments do not confer a right to permanent employment or compensation upon termination.

employment petition_dismissed Significant temporary contractual employment regularization termination natural justice

Union of India & Ors. v. Shyam Sunder; Union of India and Ors. v. Arun Kumar

28 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:3532-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's order mandating uniform seniority weightage marks in Railway promotions, dismissing the Northern Railway's challenge and reinforcing non-discrimination under Article 14.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant seniority weightage Indian Railway Establishment Manual promotion Central Administrative Tribunal

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd. v. Vishal Sharma and Another

28 Jul 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:3538

The Delhi High Court granted summary decree for recovery of outstanding housing loan against the borrower due to failure to file leave to defend, while denying refund claims against the builder absent cancellation of allotment.

civil appeal_dismissed Order XXXVII CPC summary suit loan recovery leave to defend

TPF Technologies Pvt Ltd & Anr v. Vandana Goyal & Ors

28 Jul 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:3539

The Delhi High Court restrained defendants from infringing plaintiffs' proprietary software additions while permitting use of open source code, directing accurate communication of court orders and adjourning related police complaints pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant copyright infringement open source software interim injunction confidentiality agreement

Rajesh Yadav v. Asha Devi

28 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3546

The Delhi High Court upheld a bona fide necessity eviction petition allowing a landlord's son to start a new business, rejecting tenant's claims of alternative premises and emphasizing landlord's discretion in choosing suitable premises.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide necessity eviction petition Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 alternative premises

Ajay Panday v. UOI and Ors.; Ravinder Lamba v. UOI and Ors.

28 Jul 2014 · Reva Khetrapal; Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:3521-DB

The Delhi High Court held that appointments through LDCE in CISF are by promotion and directed uniform application of medical standards, quashing medical boards' findings that arbitrarily declared petitioners unfit.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Limited Departmental Competitive Examination LDCE promotion vs direct recruitment medical standards

Someshwar Dayal v. Anupama Dayal

28 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Pratibha Rani · 2016:DHC:5811-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a spouse cannot withdraw a guardianship petition and continue to benefit from interim custody orders, allowing the other spouse to be transposed as petitioner to protect the children's welfare.

family appeal_allowed Significant Guardians and Wards Act Section 25 interim custody orders withdrawal of petition

Sh. Vijay Singh v. Sh. S K Chaudhary & Anr.

27 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3512

The Delhi High Court set aside the leave to defend granted in an eviction petition after the petitioner deleted one joint tenant denying tenancy, holding that no bona fide dispute remained requiring trial.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 25-B(8) Article 227 Constitution of India leave to defend

Samarjit Chakravarty & Anr. v. M/S Tej Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

25 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3499

The Delhi High Court held that parties claiming rights through a compromise with legal heirs who have unsuccessfully challenged a prior decree for specific performance have no locus to challenge that decree, dismissing the suit as an abuse of process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell locus standi compromise decree

Rhydburg Pharmaceuticals Ltd. v. ESI Corporation

25 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:3507-DB

The Delhi High Court held that a debarring order based on supply of sub-standard drugs must be preceded by a Show Cause Notice specifying contractual grounds and material facts to ensure procedural fairness, directing a fresh notice and opportunity to respond.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Show Cause Notice Debarring order Rate Contract Category A defect

Samarjit Chakravarty & Anr. v. M/S Tej Properties Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

25 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3501

The Delhi High Court held that parties claiming through successors who failed to set aside a final decree for specific performance have no locus to challenge it, dismissing the suit as an abuse of process.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance agreement to sell locus standi compromise decree

Gulshan Kumar Arora v. Ashwani Shukla

25 Jul 2014 · Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw, J. · 2014:DHC:3500-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal seeking specific performance against one joint seller without full trial and all parties as respondents, emphasizing the discretionary nature of specific performance and the necessity of impleading all parties.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant specific performance joint contract status quo condonation of delay

Jing Cheng India v. Rattan Chand thr Lrs Sudarshan Anand & Ors

25 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3504

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging the trial court’s order striking off defence due to petitioner’s delay, concealment, and non-compliance with court directions.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India striking off defence delay and laches concealment of facts

Yash Pal v. Gopal Singh Nim

25 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3509

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant on bona fide necessity grounds for an Advocate-landlord’s office, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and rejecting claims of alternative accommodation.

property appeal_dismissed Significant bona fide necessity eviction Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 leave to defend

Sujata Gupta v. Uma Gupta

25 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3506

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging multiple orders as an abuse of process for causing delay in a possession suit, emphasizing that repeated frivolous applications cannot be entertained and imposing costs to ensure expeditious trial.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India abuse of process frivolous petitions delay in suit

Md. Ashfaque Ansari v. Union of India & Ors.

25 Jul 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:3508-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal against refusal of interim relief for temporary registration to practice Indian Medicine, holding that such relief cannot be granted when the statutory authority has denied registration due to non-recognition of qualification.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant interim relief temporary registration Indian Medicine qualification recognition

Krishan Gopal & Ors. v. Ram Phal Yadav & Ors.

25 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3510

The Delhi High Court upheld the dismissal of leave to defend applications in an eviction petition, affirming that a co-owner can file for eviction without objection from other co-owners and rejecting belated or vague ownership and tenancy challenges.

property petition_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition leave to defend co-owner eviction rights

Nand Kishore v. State (Govt of NCT) Delhi

25 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3505-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a son for raping his 72-year-old mother, relying on consistent prosecutrix testimony corroborated by medical and forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant rape Section 376 IPC prosecutrix statement medical evidence

R.K. Bhardwaj v. New Delhi Municipal Council

25 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:3511-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld that re-employment under the GNCT scheme is limited to the PGT level and does not entitle retired Principals or Vice-Principals to re-employment in their former promotional posts.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant re-employment scheme Principal Vice-Principal Post Graduate Teacher

Avinash v. State

25 Jul 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:3502

The Delhi High Court held that imposing a reasonable condition to provide for the child is a valid exercise of judicial discretion under Section 438 CrPC and granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner in a matrimonial harassment case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant anticipatory bail Section 438 CrPC matrimonial dispute maintenance