Delhi High Court

92,628 judgments

Year:

Bhagwan Singh & Ors. v. UOI & Ors.

24 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:3482-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court set aside the Tribunal's order on seniority and promotion reversion, remanding for reconsideration applying correct eligibility criteria and reservation principles as per Supreme Court directions.

administrative petition_allowed Significant seniority promotion reserved category reversion

Deepak Gupta v. Sushma Aggarwal

24 Jul 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:3498

The Delhi High Court held that leave to defend must be granted in eviction proceedings under the Delhi Rent Control Act where a triable issue exists on the landlord's bonafide necessity, dismissing the landlord's review petition and directing trial on merits.

property appeal_allowed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 eviction petition bonafide necessity leave to defend

Commissioner of Income Tax v. Siel Ltd.

24 Jul 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:3488-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the genuineness of a share sale transaction between joint venture partners and accepted the claimed capital loss, rejecting Revenue's claim of a colourable device and tax evasion.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant capital loss colourable device joint venture share sale

Sita Ram v. State

24 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3471-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of appellant Sita Ram for murder under Section 302/34 IPC, affirming the reliability of victim’s identification, recovery of stolen property, and application of common intention doctrine.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 302 IPC common intention Test Identification Parade disclosure statement

Pawan Kumar v. State

24 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3470-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside the murder conviction of Pawan Kumar due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and held that last-seen evidence alone cannot sustain conviction beyond reasonable doubt.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen evidence circumstantial evidence benefit of doubt murder

Dinesh Talreja & Ors. v. State & Anr.

24 Jul 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:3481

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute based on an amicable settlement and the complainant's disinterest in prosecution, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498-A IPC

Remari India (P) Ltd. v. Commissioner Sales Tax, Delhi

24 Jul 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:3480-DB

The Delhi High Court held that sales made in the course of export, where property passes after crossing the customs frontier, are exempt from sales tax under Article 286 and the Delhi Sales Tax Act, remitting the matter for factual determination.

tax appeal_allowed Significant sales tax exemption course of export transfer of property Article 286

State v. Vipin Sharma & Ors.

24 Jul 2014 · S.P. Garg · 2014:DHC:3475

The Delhi High Court allowed the State's appeal and set aside the discharge of accused under Section 3 MCOCA, holding that prima facie material existed to frame charges for continuing organized crime involving cheating and forgery.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant MCOCA organized crime syndicate Section 3 MCOCA discharge of accused

Joginder Singh v. The State NCT of Delhi

24 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3477-DB

The Delhi High Court reduced Joginder Singh's conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder based on medical evidence and lack of intent, sentencing him to seven years imprisonment.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant culpable homicide not amounting to murder murder Section 302 IPC Section 304 IPC

Rekha Rani v. G.R. Kashyap

23 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3448

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition under Article 227 challenging multiple orders related to rent payment and possession, holding that final rent orders cannot be collaterally challenged after non-compliance and delay.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India rent payment non-compliance striking off defence

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Tapan Neeraj

23 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:3453-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT order directing appointment of a disabled candidate under the Disabilities Act, holding that failure to identify or notify reserved posts does not defeat the statutory right to reservation.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Persons with Disabilities Act, 1995 reservation identification of posts Section 33

Nirmal Agarwal & Ors. v. Clintus Landbase Pvt Ltd.

23 Jul 2014 · Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:3454

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award that upheld forfeiture of earnest money due to buyer's non-payment and rejected unsubstantiated damages claims.

civil petition_dismissed Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 earnest money agreement to sell

V.N.Jha, ATO/South Rohini v. Surender @ Kalwa & Ors.

23 Jul 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:3431-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the murder convictions based on strong circumstantial evidence but commuted the death sentences to life imprisonment with a minimum 25-year incarceration, emphasizing the rarest of rare doctrine and the possibility of reform.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant circumstantial evidence death sentence rarest of rare case life imprisonment without remission

Jitender Singh v. State & Anr.

23 Jul 2014 · Pratibha Rani · 2014:DHC:3455

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition to quash an FIR under Section 376 IPC, holding that serious offences like rape cannot be quashed merely on the basis of a settlement between parties.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant quashing of FIR Section 376 IPC rape non-compoundable offence

Krishan Lal Gandhi v. Rajendar Prasad

23 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3458

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court’s discretion to allow additional evidence to prove a registered Will at the final arguments stage, dismissing the petitioner’s challenge under Article 227.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Article 227 Constitution of India Code of Civil Procedure registered Will additional evidence

Sh. Salek Ram and Anr. v. Sh. Dharma through LRs & Anr.

23 Jul 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:3457

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order allowing impleadment of legal heirs of a deceased defendant in a suit for injunction over immovable property and dismissed the petition challenging the same.

civil petition_dismissed right to sue legal heirs impleadment injunction suit

Sanatan Dharam Mandir Sabha & Ors. v. Subash Kapoor

23 Jul 2014 · Manmohan Singh · 2014:DHC:3463

The Delhi High Court granted possession and permanent injunction to plaintiffs who were rightful beneficiaries under a probated Will against the defendant's unauthorized occupation of the suit property.

civil appeal_allowed probate of Will possession mesne profits permanent injunction

Shahin Rustam and Anr. v. Indira Gandhi National Open University and Ors.

23 Jul 2014 · Hima Kohli · 2014:DHC:3464

The Delhi High Court held that service-related disputes involving notified user agencies must be first adjudicated by the Central Administrative Tribunal and dismissed the writ petition filed directly before the High Court for lack of maintainability.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 Central Administrative Tribunal jurisdiction writ petition maintainability

Nandan Singh Mahalwal v. Municipal Corporation of Delhi

23 Jul 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:3446-DB
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court held that stepping-up of pay under FR 22(I)(a)(1) applies upon promotion involving higher responsibility even if the pay scale remains the same, setting aside the CAT's denial of such benefit.

administrative appeal_allowed Significant Fundamental Rule 22(I)(a)(1) stepping-up of pay promotion pay scale

Laxmi Narain Jai Gopal Pvt Ltd v. Ajay Aggarwal

23 Jul 2014 · Rajiv Shakdher · 2014:DHC:3445

The court directed evidence on prior use and ownership of the trademarks "GOPAL" and "GOPAL GOLD" and allowed interim use by both parties subject to quarterly accounting pending final adjudication.

civil other trademark ownership prior use passing off trademark infringement