Delhi High Court
92,628 judgments
Union of India v. Neha Kadam
The document is an index page listing connected writ petitions before the Delhi High Court with no substantive judgment text provided.
Ganga Sahay v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and life sentence of a father for raping his minor daughter, rejecting his intoxication defense under Section 85 IPC and affirming the victim's competent testimony supported by medical evidence.
Shabnam v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted Shabnam of murder due to unreliable eyewitness testimony, invalid weapon recovery, and her spontaneous statements indicating fear, granting her benefit of doubt.
Advance Agencies Private Limited & Ors. v. Official Liquidator
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of five transferor companies with a transferee company under sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, finding no objections or prejudice and confirming compliance with regulatory requirements.
Vijaya Bank v. EPFO and Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that EPFO cannot attach properties of guarantor companies for Provident Fund dues of a separate establishment without due proceedings, setting aside the impugned attachment orders.
Sitara Media Ventures Private Limited v. C&C Alpha Group India Private Limited
The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation under the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and unsecured creditors due to their unanimous written consent.
Sanjay Aneja v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 341, 333, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between neighbors, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.
Shri Anil Jain v. Shri Bhagwan Shankar Khanna
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord's bona fide requirement for business use, limiting its revision scope to jurisdictional errors and rejecting tenant's vague defenses.
Standard Chartered Bank v. India Glycols Ltd.
The Delhi High Court held that Section 10 CPC does not apply to stay DRT proceedings under the Recovery Act as the DRT has exclusive jurisdiction, and the civil court and DRT do not have concurrent jurisdiction.
Sanddep @ Sandeep Kumar @ Sandeep Rohilla & Ors. v. Pooja & Ors.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, 34 IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act arising from matrimonial disputes based on a settlement between parties and the complainant's withdrawal, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Ishwar Dayal Kansal v. A. K. Jain
The Delhi High Court upheld the eviction of a tenant on the landlord’s bonafide need for office premises, emphasizing strict adherence to procedural timelines and estoppel against disputing landlord’s title.
Vipin @ Kake v. State
The High Court modified the conviction from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304 Part I IPC, holding that a single gunshot in a sudden quarrel lacks premeditation required for murder.
Mahanagar Telephone Nigam Limited v. Applied Electronics Ltd. & Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that cross-objections in appeals under Section 37 of the Arbitration Act are governed by the Civil Procedure Code, and condoned a 34-day delay in filing cross-objections based on sufficient cause.
SARVESH SECURITY SERVICES PVT. LTD v. GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR
The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking enforcement of a per security guard tender rate, held the bid unresponsive, but directed refund of the earnest money deposit applying the doctrine of unjust enrichment.
State v. Mohan Singh
The court held that a statement under Section 164 Cr.P.C. is not substantive evidence for rape conviction and upheld conviction only under Section 354 IPC due to lack of proof of penetration.
Kiran v. Sudesh & Ors.
The High Court held that disputes between private parties over legal heirship and entitlement to a deceased government employee's estate, including service benefits, are maintainable before Civil Courts and not barred by the Administrative Tribunals Act.