Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Inder Pal Juneja v. The Commercial Bank Employees Co-operative Urban (S.E.) Thrift & Credit Society Ltd

26 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4162

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's order returning a plaint for malicious prosecution suit due to lack of territorial jurisdiction, directing the suit to be filed in Rohtak where the cause of action arose.

civil petition_dismissed malicious prosecution territorial jurisdiction Order VII Rule 10 CPC Article 227 Constitution

Bhaichung Bhutia v. Soumik Dutta & Ors.

26 Aug 2014 · Manmohan Singh, J. · 2014:DHC:4163

The Delhi High Court granted an interim injunction restraining defendants from publishing defamatory statements against Bhaichung Bhutia, balancing freedom of expression with protection of reputation under Article 19(2) of the Constitution.

civil appeal_allowed Significant defamation interim injunction freedom of expression Article 19(1) and 19(2)

Narender Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

26 Aug 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4149-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions for kidnapping, robbery, and murder based on lawful recoveries of the deceased's belongings from the accused and the presumption of guilt arising from unexplained possession under the Indian Evidence Act.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant recovery of stolen property Section 27 Indian Evidence Act presumption of guilt circumstantial evidence

Union of India and Ors. v. Ravi Shankar Kumar Sinha

26 Aug 2014 · C. Hari Shankar; Ajay Digpaul · 2025 SCC OnLine Del 1244
Cites 3 · Cited by 520

The Delhi High Court upheld the Tribunal's quashing of a dismissal order where the disciplinary authority's disagreement note was conclusive rather than tentative and critical evidence was not properly proved, emphasizing adherence to natural justice in departmental proceedings.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant disagreement note departmental inquiry natural justice proof of documents

Satish Chand Kasana & Anr. v. Chandra Shekhar Yadav & Anr.

25 Aug 2014 · JAYANT NATH · 2014:DHC:4096

The Delhi High Court held that a tractor-trolley used for agricultural purposes can be driven with an LMV (Non-Transport) license and the insurance company alone is liable to pay compensation without recourse to recover from the insured.

motor_vehicles_accident_compensation appeal_allowed Significant tractor-trolley driving license LMV Non-Transport LMV Commercial

Rajesh Rishi Dev v. State (GNCT of Delhi)

25 Aug 2014 · S. Muralidhar · 2014:DHC:4098

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction and sentence of appellants for kidnapping and wrongful confinement of a minor child based on credible eyewitness and mobile phone evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed kidnapping wrongful confinement disclosure statement mobile phone call detail records

Sanjay @ Punti & Anr. v. State

25 Aug 2014 · Sunita Gupta · 2014:DHC:4123

The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307 IPC and held that compromise during appeal in serious offences does not warrant acquittal or sentence reduction, especially where accused have criminal antecedents.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant Section 307 IPC Attempted murder Compromise in criminal cases Section 482 CrPC

Kheta Lal Patel & Anr. v. Jerun Nissa & Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4114

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's refusal to treat an earlier judgment as res judicata for possession, holding that settled possession cannot be disturbed without due process and tenancy status was not conclusively determined.

civil petition_dismissed Article 227 Constitution of India Section 11 CPC Order 12 Rule 6 CPC res judicata

North Municipal Corporation of Delhi v. M/S Harchan Dass Gupta Const. Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2014 · Deepa Sharma · 2014:DHC:4144
Cites 1 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging an arbitral award as barred by limitation due to delay in refiling beyond the prescribed period under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, holding that such delay cannot be condoned without sufficient cause.

civil petition_dismissed Significant Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Section 34 limitation period condonation of delay

Gopi Ram v. Rakesh Kumar Aggarwal & Anr.

25 Aug 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4146

Civil courts lack jurisdiction over disputes involving SARFAESI Act enforcement measures, which must be challenged before the Debts Recovery Tribunal, and secured creditors must follow due process before evicting lessees.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant SARFAESI Act Section 17 SARFAESI Section 34 SARFAESI civil court jurisdiction

Rais Mian v. Abdul Samad

25 Aug 2014 · Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4104

The Delhi High Court upheld eviction of a tenant from commercial premises under section 14(1)(e) of the Delhi Rent Control Act, holding the landlord's bona fide requirement genuine and rejecting tenant's leave to defend application.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 Section 14(1)(e) bona fide requirement eviction

Commissioner of Income Tax – III v. M/S R.R. Holdings Pvt. Ltd.

25 Aug 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4097-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court upheld the levy of interest under Section 217(1A) of the Income Tax Act on an assessee's default in paying advance tax despite filing an estimate, reversing the ITAT's deletion of such interest.

tax appeal_allowed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 217(1A) interest levy advance tax

Commissioner of Income Tax v. M/S Navodaya Castles Pvt Ltd

25 Aug 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4106-DB

The Delhi High Court held that under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, the assessee must prove identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of share subscribers beyond mere documentation, and remitted the matter for fresh adjudication where material indicated accommodation entries.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Section 68 Income Tax Act share application money accommodation entries identity of shareholder

Kaushalya Devi (Deceased) Through LRs v. Shanti Devi and Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4109

The Delhi High Court upheld the order directing payment of reasonable interim user charges during the pendency of an eviction appeal under the Delhi Rent Control Act, relying on the Supreme Court's Atma Ram Properties precedent.

civil petition_dismissed Significant interim user charges eviction appeal Delhi Rent Control Act Order 41 Rule 5 CPC

Lurgi India International Services Private Limited v. Air Liquide Engineering India Private Limited

25 Aug 2014 · Sanjeev Sachdeva · 2014:DHC:4108

The Delhi High Court approved a Scheme of Amalgamation under Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, dispensing with meetings of shareholders and creditors due to their consent and absence of creditors.

corporate appeal_allowed Scheme of Amalgamation Companies Act 1956 Sections 391 to 394 dispensation of meetings

Chatter Singh v. UOI & Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4105-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the denial of retrospective pay arrears to a petitioner promoted later than his juniors, holding that cadre restructuring did not amount to automatic upgradation without compliance with promotion procedures.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant cadre restructuring promotion trade test retrospective arrears

Pappu @ Jolly v. State

25 Aug 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4107-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to insufficient circumstantial evidence and failure to exclude other possibilities, emphasizing strict scrutiny of last seen evidence and recovery in slum murder cases.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant last seen evidence circumstantial evidence murder recovery of weapon

Jai Bhagwan v. Union of India and Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4116-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld termination of a temporary government employee without departmental enquiry, holding that habitual misconduct rendering him unfit for service justified termination under Rule 5 of the Central Civil Service (Temporary Service) Rules, 1965.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant termination of service temporary service rules departmental enquiry natural justice

Roopesh Rai Sikand v. The Federal Bank Ltd. and Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:4117

The Delhi High Court dismissed the suit as withdrawn after the plaintiff satisfied the bank’s mortgage claim, directing return of title deeds and issuance of a No Dues Certificate, affirming protection for bona fide purchasers upon discharge of secured debts.

civil appeal_dismissed bona fide purchaser mortgage Debt Recovery Tribunal recovery proceedings

Shri Samiullah & Ors. v. Sh. Rafiullah & Ors.

25 Aug 2014 · G. P. Mittal · 2014:DHC:4120

The Delhi High Court held that a forged Will without consent of all heirs is invalid under Muslim Personal Law, and ordered partition of property according to intestate succession shares.

civil appeal_allowed Significant partition suit Muslim Personal Law intestate succession validity of Will