Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Raj Kapoor & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR arising from a domestic dispute under Sections 323, 324, 341, 506, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.
Sajjan Pal v. Usha Mehta
The Delhi High Court upheld the appointment of a receiver over a disputed flat where prima facie evidence of fraud in possession and conflicting sale agreements was established.
Gopal Chand v. State
The Delhi High Court upheld the murder conviction based on consistent and credible dying declarations despite absence of medical fitness certification at the time of recording.
Harender v. State; Mahender @ Guddu v. State
Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307/34 IPC based on reliable injured witness testimony and rejected probation plea, dismissing appeals of accused who inflicted grievous injuries in a premeditated attack.
Ashwani Kumar v. Sukh Devi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that an unregistered and inadequately stamped agreement to sell executed after the 2001 amendment cannot confer possession rights or party status in a property suit.
Yogender Choudhary v. State (Govt. of NCT) Delhi
The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder and robbery charges due to unreliable eyewitness testimony and lack of credible corroborative evidence.
Upright Enterprises Limited & Ors. v. Sucon India Limited
The Delhi High Court sanctioned the Scheme of Amalgamation of eight transferor companies with a transferee company under Sections 391 and 394 of the Companies Act, 1956, after ensuring statutory compliance and absence of objections.
Aparna Singh & Ors. v. State of NCT Delhi
The Delhi High Court granted letters of administration to the sole class-I legal heirs of the deceased under Section 278 of the Indian Succession Act, finding no legal impediment or objection.
Aktiebolaget Volvo & Ors. v. Babu Lal Sharma & Anr.
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and punitive damages to plaintiffs for infringement of the well-known trademark 'VOLVO' by defendants using the identical mark on buses without authorization.
Mittar Sain v. Rajesh Kumar
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under Section 14(1)(e) of the DRC Act, holding that bona fide commercial need and absence of alternative accommodation justify refusal of leave to defend, even where ownership is based on an unprobated will.
Sunil Ravi Prakash Agrawal v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr
The Delhi High Court held that limitation periods prescribed by non-statutory notices for allotment of alternative land cannot be rigidly enforced and quashed the rejection of the petitioner’s application on such grounds.
Naresh Kumar & Ors. v. Govt. of National Capital Territory of Delhi & Ors.
The Delhi High Court directed the Deputy Commissioner to dispose of the petitioners' pending representation for land demarcation within one month, disposing of the writ petition accordingly.
Khalid Mehmood v. State of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the Juvenile Justice Act does not override TADA provisions and dismissed the petition challenging the petitioner’s conviction under TADA on the ground of juvenile status.
Daya Kishan & Ors. v. Tehsildar - Najafgarh & Ors.
The Delhi High Court allowed the revenue authorities' review petition to recall its earlier order directing demarcation of non-existent Khasra numbers, clarifying that demarcation must align with current revenue records and encroachment issues fall under civic authority jurisdiction.
SRI RAMAN GROVER v. UNION OF INDIA & ORS
Acquisition proceedings under the 1894 Act lapse under Section 24(2) of the 2013 Act if award was made over five years before its commencement and possession or compensation is not completed, regardless of interim court orders.
Sh. Lachi Ram Sharma v. Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan and Ors.
The Delhi High Court set aside the CAT’s order upholding dismissal for alleged false documents and directed an independent enquiry to verify the genuineness of the disputed certificate and clarification letter.
Sajid Khan v. State NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court upheld convictions under Section 307/34 IPC based on credible eyewitness and medical evidence, while modifying sentences of two appellants considering their roles.
Dayawati @ Premwati & Anr. v. Dalip Kumar
The High Court upheld the concurrent decrees for recovery of rent by the landlord, holding that mere ownership claims do not bar Small Cause Court jurisdiction under the PSCC Act and dismissed the petition under Article 227.
Khalid v. State
The Delhi High Court disposed of Criminal Appeal No. 1044/2011 by referring to a common detailed judgment delivered in a related appeal on the same day.
Gaurav Joshi and Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC to promote harmony and prevent abuse of process.