Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

Deepak & Anr. v. The State & Anr.

26 Aug 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4170

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act after the disputed electricity bill was paid in full and the complainant withdrew prosecution, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and the precedent in Gian Singh.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Indian Electricity Act non-compoundable offence

Swapnil Yadav @ Sonu Yadav v. State & Anr

26 Aug 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4169

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under the Indian Electricity Act for electricity theft after the petitioner paid the disputed bill and the complainant withdrew prosecution, relying on the inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C. and Supreme Court precedent.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Indian Electricity Act 2003 electricity theft

Mohd. Arif Ansari v. Nasreen Alias Chhoti & Ors.

26 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4165

The High Court dismissed the petition challenging eviction execution, holding that possession taken from premises other than those decreed for eviction is illegal and must be restored.

property petition_dismissed Significant eviction decree execution of decree illegal eviction fraud on court

Rashda Siddiqui v. Commissioner of Income Tax-VIII, New Delhi

26 Aug 2014 · Badar Durrez Ahmed; Siddharth Mridul · 2014:DHC:4172-DB

The Delhi High Court held that for Assessment Year 2006-07, paintings could be personal effects if held for personal use, remitting the matter to the Assessing Officer to decide based on evidence, and set aside orders rejecting the petitioner's rectification application.

tax other Significant capital asset personal effects Section 2(14) Income Tax Act painting

Brahm Prakash v. Delhi Transport Corporation

26 Aug 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4168-DB
Cites 2 · Cited by 0

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition seeking pay scale parity for an Assistant Welder with Welders, holding the claim barred by limitation and lacking merit due to distinct duties and promotional hierarchy.

service_law petition_dismissed Significant equal pay for equal work pay scale revision limitation Assistant Welder

Hardeep Kaur & Ors. v. Deepansh Malhotra & Anr.

26 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4177

The Delhi High Court upheld dismissal of objections to execution for default due to petitioners' deliberate delays and non-appearance, emphasizing the need for diligent prosecution of execution objections.

civil appeal_dismissed execution of decree objections to execution relinquishment deed dismissal in default

Kritender Sharma v. State

26 Aug 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:4173

The Delhi High Court allowed the petitioner to examine himself as a witness under Section 315 Cr.P.C., modifying the trial court’s order to prevent undue delay while safeguarding the accused’s right to defence.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 315 Cr.P.C. Examination of accused Trial procedure Section 311 Cr.P.C.

Mahesh Chand v. Union of India and Ors.

26 Aug 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4160-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's order rejecting a petitioner's belated attempt to withdraw his refusal of promotion, holding that acceptance of refusal extinguishes the right to claim promotion absent statutory provisions permitting revival.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant refusal of promotion withdrawal of refusal Department of Personnel and Training guidelines limited departmental examination

South Delhi Municipal Corporation v. M/S Radhey Shyam

26 Aug 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4171

The Delhi High Court held that deposit of an arbitral award amount in court as a condition for stay of execution does not extinguish interest liability unless it is an unconditional payment under Order XXI Rule 1 CPC.

civil petition_dismissed Significant interest on arbitral award deposit in court Order XXI Rule 1 CPC stay of execution

Shubh Arora & Ors. v. State

26 Aug 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4175

The Delhi High Court set aside non-bailable warrants issued against petitioners in a family dispute case due to procedural irregularities and amicable settlement, allowing their appearance before the Magistrate on a future date.

criminal appeal_allowed Section 482 CrPC non-bailable warrant amicable settlement family dispute

Prabhjeet Singh v. State

26 Aug 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4176

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Section 279 IPC based on an amicable settlement between parties, emphasizing the cautious exercise of inherent powers under Section 482 CrPC in non-serious offences.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR amicable settlement non-compoundable offence

Arjun Pandit v. State

26 Aug 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4148-DB

The Delhi High Court acquitted the appellant of murder due to lack of conclusive evidence linking the recovered dagger to the injuries and contradictions in the prosecution case.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant murder recovery of weapon post-mortem report contradictions in evidence

Narender Singh v. State NCT of Delhi

26 Aug 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4151-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of appellants for robbery, kidnapping, and murder based on circumstantial evidence and recoveries under Section 27 Indian Evidence Act, affirming the presumption of guilt when stolen articles are found in accused's possession without satisfactory explanation.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant circumstantial evidence recovery of stolen property Section 27 Indian Evidence Act presumption of guilt

All India Panchayat Parishad v. Govt. of NCT of Delhi

26 Aug 2014 · The Chief Justice; Rajiv Sahai Endlaw · 2014:DHC:4155-DB
Cites 0 · Cited by 1

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition seeking directions to protect Gram Sabha lands, holding that the reliefs were already covered by Supreme Court directions and implemented by State task forces.

administrative petition_dismissed Significant Gram Sabha land illegal encroachment Public Interest Litigation Supreme Court directions

All India Students Association (AISA) v. The Chief Election Officer (DUSU Elections 2014-15) & Anr.

26 Aug 2014 · Manmohan · 2014:DHC:4157

The Delhi High Court held that courts should not interfere with the ongoing student union election process conducted under statutory rules and dismissed the petition challenging alphabetical ballot numbering.

constitutional petition_dismissed Significant Article 226 election interference ballot number assignment Delhi University Students Union elections

Commissioner v. T.G. Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.

26 Aug 2014 · Sanjiv Khanna; V. Kameswar Rao · 2014:DHC:4156-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the ITAT order holding that expenditure on a self-constructed project with commenced operations should be treated under Accounting Standard 2 and not capitalized as pre-operative expenditure under Accounting Standard 7.

tax appeal_dismissed Significant Income Tax Act, 1961 Section 260A Accounting Standard 2 Accounting Standard 7

XYZ & ANR v. Union of India & Ors.

26 Aug 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2014:DHC:4158

The Delhi High Court dismissed a petition challenging the men's squash team selection for the 2014 World University Championships, holding that procedural irregularities and lack of substantiated grievances warranted dismissal.

administrative petition_dismissed National Sports Development Code of India, 2011 selection trials eligibility criteria Revised FISU Eligibility Rules

Santosh Rani v. Union of India

26 Aug 2014 · Vibhu BakhrU · 2014:DHC:4159

The Delhi High Court held that a petitioner judicially recognized as a Punjab migrant residing in a designated refugee camp is entitled to housing allotment under the Punjab Migrants Rehabilitation Scheme despite disputes over unauthorized occupation.

administrative petition_allowed Significant Punjab Migrants Housing Scheme Delhi Development Authority Refugee Camps

Anil Kumar Dhawan & Ors. v. State & Anr.

26 Aug 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4161

The Delhi High Court quashed FIR and criminal proceedings under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from a matrimonial dispute on the ground of an amicable settlement between the parties and the complainant's disinterest in prosecution.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR Section 498-A IPC matrimonial dispute

Surinder Kumar Sharma v. Punjab National Bank

26 Aug 2014 · A.K. Pathak · 2014:DHC:4174

The Delhi High Court dismissed the appeal, upholding the trial court's finding that the appellant breached the contract for sale of paper and was not entitled to specific performance or refund beyond expenses paid for truck charges.

civil appeal_dismissed specific performance contract breach as is where is sale of goods