Delhi High Court
92,849 judgments
Lalit Kala Akademi v. SVAPN Constructions and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that the limitation period under Section 34(3) of the Arbitration Act is absolute and dismissed the petition challenging the arbitral award as barred by limitation, refusing to condone delay in re-filing beyond the prescribed period.
Shandar Husain Kazmi v. Government of NCT of Delhi
The Delhi High Court held that the petitioner’s pay scale placement was not a promotion and directed grant of second financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme, overruling the CAT’s denial.
Sanjeev Gupta & Ors. v. Subhash Kumar Gupta and Anr.
The Delhi High Court upheld an eviction order, holding that the statutory 15-day period for filing a leave to defend under the Delhi Rent Control Act is mandatory and cannot be extended or amended, and that a mere formal application without substantive facts does not entitle tenants to defend.
Parwar Singh v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a pay scale assignment to rectify an anomaly does not constitute a promotion, entitling the petitioner to second financial upgradation under the ACP scheme.
Om Prakash Raheja v. Government of NCT of Delhi and Anr.
The Delhi High Court held that a pay scale adjustment not amounting to promotion does not disqualify an employee from second financial upgradation under the ACP scheme and directed grant of such benefit to the petitioner.
SAP AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT & ANR. v. M/S MICROBASE TECHNOLOGIES
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction against a defendant for unauthorized use and training on plaintiffs' copyrighted SAP software without license, holding it as copyright infringement.
Amit Sharma v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual divorce, applying its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Nanika International v. Praveen Gupta & Associates
The Delhi High Court granted permanent injunction and damages to the registered trademark owner against unauthorized use of an identical mark causing infringement and passing off.
M/S PAYAL VISIONS PVT. LTD v. MS. RADHIKA CHAUDHARY
The Delhi High Court decreed mesne profits to the landlord for unlawful possession by the tenant post-termination, applying a reasonable escalation rate in absence of direct evidence.
Mantola Co-operative Thrift & Credit Society Ltd. v. Commissioner of Income Tax
Interest income earned by a cooperative society from surplus funds invested in fixed deposits is taxable under income from other sources and not exempt under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
Naveen v. The State (GNCT of Delhi)
The Delhi High Court set aside the conviction of a husband under Sections 498A and 304B IPC for dowry death, holding that the prosecution failed to prove cruelty or harassment related to dowry demands beyond reasonable doubt.
M/S. SURVI PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED v. M/S. OM BUILDERS
The Delhi High Court granted a decree for recovery of Rs. 24,24,706/- in favor of the plaintiff against the ex parte defendant for breach of subcontract terms and non-payment.
Commissioner of Income Tax v. Raghubir Singh Garg
The Delhi High Court held that recording the satisfaction note under Section 158BD after passing the block assessment order under Section 158BC against the searched person does not invalidate block assessment proceedings against another person.
Virjesh Kumar Gupta v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Ors.
The Delhi High Court held that a defendant disputing execution of loan documents is not entitled to discharge or mandatory expert examination of signatures at the preliminary stage, and such issues are to be decided on evidence at the final stage.
Jitender & Ors. v. State & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A and 304-B IPC on the ground of a bona fide settlement between the parties, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Rajeev Bakshi v. State
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 285 and 338 IPC on the basis of a genuine settlement between the petitioner and the deceased's legal representatives at the investigation stage, applying the inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Vikas Thawani & Anr. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.
The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498-A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of a bona fide settlement and the complainant's disinterest in prosecution, relying on its inherent powers under Section 482 Cr.P.C.
Noor Jahan and Ors. v. Harbir Singh and Ors.
A second execution petition is maintainable to recall an earlier dismissal as satisfied if the factual basis for satisfaction was mistaken or the agreement failed to materialize.
Lalit Kumar Modi v. Union of India & Ors.
The Delhi High Court upheld the revocation of Lalit Kumar Modi's passport under Section 10(3)(c) of the Passports Act for non-compliance with summons issued during FEMA investigations, affirming the exercise of power in public interest with due process.
Ashok Kapoor & Ors. v. Vidya Shankar Sharma
The Delhi High Court upheld eviction under bona fide requirement grounds, ruling that an agreement to sell does not confer ownership or prevent eviction without conveyance.