Delhi High Court

92,849 judgments

Year:

State v. Akil @ Pappu

02 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4236-DB

The High Court held that firing with intent to kill one person but injuring another attracts conviction under Section 307 IPC by transferred malice, modifying the conviction from Section 326 IPC accordingly.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 307 IPC Section 326 IPC Transferred malice Attempt to murder

Vikram Sharma v. State

02 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4353

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR arising from matrimonial disputes under Sections 498-A and 406 IPC based on a valid settlement between the parties, emphasizing the court's inherent power under Section 482 Cr.P.C. to prevent abuse of process and secure ends of justice.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 Cr.P.C. quashing of FIR matrimonial disputes Section 498-A IPC

Wing Cdr SJS Randhawa v. Union of India and Others

02 Sep 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4332-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld disciplinary action against an Air Force officer for unauthorized absence despite administrative delays in leave sanction, emphasizing strict adherence to leave rules in a disciplined force.

administrative petition_dismissed disciplinary action leave rules study leave absence without leave

Nirmal Kanta v. New Delhi Municipal Council

02 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4331-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging pay scale fixation, holding the claim barred by limitation and laches and affirming the distinction between junior and senior posts under recruitment rules.

administrative petition_dismissed pay scale fixation equal pay for equal work limitation laches

Ram Avtar v. State

02 Sep 2014 · Pradeep Nandrajog; Mukta Gupta · 2014:DHC:4322-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the conviction of Ram Avtar for murdering his wife based on a credible dying declaration and corroborative eyewitness testimony despite absence of forensic evidence.

criminal appeal_dismissed Significant dying declaration murder kerosene oil burn injuries

Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. v. Umrao Finance and Leasing Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.

02 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4334

The Delhi High Court held that a suit concerning immovable property must be filed in the court having jurisdiction over the property and ordered the plaint returned for filing in the competent court at Bulandshahr, UP.

civil appeal_allowed Significant Section 16 CPC territorial jurisdiction immovable property Order VII Rule 10 CPC

Ashok Kriplani v. Shiva Texyarn Ltd.

02 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4333

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's refusal to allow amendment changing 'pledge' to 'mortgage' of shares, holding that shares remain movable property and admissions in pleadings cannot be withdrawn without cause.

civil petition_dismissed Significant pledge of shares mortgage of shares movable property immovable property

Sanjay Kumar Singh v. Union of India & Anr.

02 Sep 2014 · Kailash Gambhir; Najmi Waziri · 2014:DHC:4335-DB

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging seniority fixation post-merger of Overseer and Superintendent BR Grade II posts under the Sixth Pay Commission, holding that seniority cannot be retrospectively altered and no mandatory procedure to invite objections exists.

administrative petition_dismissed Seniority Merger of posts Sixth Central Pay Commission Overseer

M/S MAHAVIR STORE v. GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI

02 Sep 2014 · Vibhu Bakhru · 2014:DHC:4348

The Delhi High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging the cancellation of a Fixed Price Shop licence for record manipulation and false affidavits, holding that the administrative order was justified and not liable to interference under Article 226.

administrative petition_dismissed Public Distribution System Fixed Price Shop licence cancellation show cause notice

Akhilesh Kumar Verma v. Maruti Udyog Ltd.

02 Sep 2014 · Gita Mittal; Sunil Gaur · 2014:DHC:4347-DB

The Delhi High Court set aside a compensation award for wrongful dismissal due to procedural and evidentiary lapses and remanded the matter for fresh consideration with proper evidence and cross-examination.

civil appeal_allowed Significant wrongful dismissal disciplinary inquiry domestic inquiry report mala fide

Vivek Kumar & Ors. v. The State of Delhi & Ors.

02 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4337

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes based on an amicable settlement and mutual divorce, exercising its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal appeal_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute Section 498A IPC

Deep Singh & Anr v. State & Anr

02 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4342

The Delhi High Court quashed a criminal FIR under multiple IPC sections based on an amicable settlement between parties, applying its inherent power under Section 482 CrPC in line with Supreme Court precedents.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR non-compoundable offences amicable settlement

Satyender Verma & Ors. v. State of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

02 Sep 2014 · Sudershan Kumar Misra · 2014:DHC:4340

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR under Sections 498A, 406, and 34 IPC arising from matrimonial disputes on the ground of amicable settlement and mutual consent divorce, applying the inherent power under Section 482 CrPC.

criminal petition_allowed Significant Section 482 CrPC quashing of FIR matrimonial dispute settlement

Housing Development Finance Corporation Ltd v. Umesh Kumar Rai and Another

02 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4355

The court held that a borrower's obligation to repay a housing loan is independent of disputes with the builder, dismissing the defendant's leave to defend and decreeing the suit for recovery of outstanding loan amounts.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant Order XXXVII CPC leave to defend housing loan tripartite agreement

Sarla Rakheja v. Bimla & Others

02 Sep 2014 · G. S. Sistani · 2014:DHC:4357

The Delhi High Court upheld an interlocutory injunction restraining defendants from alienating the disputed property, emphasizing the plaintiff's strong prima facie case and the need to preserve status quo pending final adjudication.

civil appeal_dismissed Significant interlocutory injunction sale deed agreement to sell possession

Saint Soldier Modern Senior Secondary School v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner

02 Sep 2014 · Reva Khetrapal; S. P. Garg · 2014:DHC:4349-DB

The Delhi High Court held that the Employees' Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal cannot condone delay beyond the maximum 120-day period prescribed under the EPF Act and Limitation Act provisions excluding such extension do not apply.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant Employees' Provident Fund Act Limitation Act condonation of delay special statute

Arun Kumar Sharma v. Pawan Gupta

02 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4323

The Delhi High Court upheld the landlord's bonafide necessity claim for possession of a ground floor shop, ruling that first floor accommodation does not constitute suitable alternative premises for the business.

property appeal_dismissed Significant Delhi Rent Control Act, 1958 bonafide necessity landlord-tenant relationship alternative accommodation

Nitin @ Menu v. State

02 Sep 2014 · Ved Prakash Vaish · 2014:DHC:4350

The Delhi High Court upheld the trial court's dismissal of the petitioner's application to recall prosecution witnesses under Section 311 Cr.P.C., holding that such power must be exercised judiciously and not to cause delay or fill gaps in evidence.

criminal petition_dismissed Significant Section 311 Cr.P.C. recall of witnesses discretionary power cross-examination

SHRI JITENDER KUMAR v. AMRIT PAL AGGARWAL & ORS.

02 Sep 2014 · Valmiki J. Mehta · 2014:DHC:4356

The Delhi High Court dismissed the petition challenging the trial court's order allowing amendment of pleadings under Order VI Rule 17 CPC and held that such amendment is permissible if filed within a reasonable time after knowledge of relevant facts.

civil petition_dismissed amendment of pleadings Order VI Rule 17 CPC Article 227 Constitution limitation for amendment

Delhi Subordinate Services Selection Board v. Sanjeev Kumar

02 Sep 2014 · S. Ravindra Bhat; Vipin Sanghi · 2014:DHC:4352-DB

The Delhi High Court upheld the CAT's direction that a candidate with equal marks as the last selected unreserved candidate should be considered for appointment if a vacancy arises due to non-joining.

administrative appeal_dismissed Significant waiting list equal marks unreserved category appointment